United States District Court FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Murray
|
Professional court reporter |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | The district court issued a judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00020137.pdf
This document is a Search and Seizure Warrant issued on July 7, 2019, by Judge Barbara Moses of the SDNY (Case No. 19 MAG 6572). The warrant authorizes the search of a multi-story single-family residence in New York (visually identifiable as Jeffrey Epstein's townhouse) in relation to sex trafficking investigations (18 U.S.C. 1591 and 371). Specific items to be seized include taxidermied dogs, massage tables, busts of female torsos, sex toys, and a binder labeled 'PB Girls'.
EFTA00019872.pdf
This is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 13, 2021. It commands an unnamed (redacted) individual to appear on November 29, 2021, to testify in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Clerk of Court Ruby J. Krajick.
EFTA00019651.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
EFTA00019217.pdf
This document is an internal email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the opening of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* in November 2021. The emails discuss logistics for the opening statements, including courtroom assignments (Main: 40 Foley, courtroom 318) and overflow rooms. Notably, one email contains a pointed critique of Florida prosecutors (referencing the earlier Epstein non-prosecution agreement), stating that while others might be afraid to prosecute 1994 crimes, the SDNY is not.
EFTA00016391.pdf
This document is an official Arrest Warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on June 29, 2019, for Ghislaine Maxwell. The warrant commands law enforcement to arrest Maxwell based on an indictment charging her with multiple offenses, including conspiracy to entice and transport minors, enticement of a minor, transportation of a minor, and perjury. The warrant is signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith in White Plains, NY.
EFTA00015219.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by Michael G. Seidel, an FBI official, detailing his role and the FBI's handling of a FOIA request from James Robertson and Radar Online LLC concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the FBI's process for responding to the request, including the number of pages processed and withheld, and provides background on Epstein's criminal history and death.
EFTA00013393.pdf
An email dated September 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient (Ms.). The email concerns a subpoena served on the recipient's office regarding an upcoming criminal trial (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeframe). The attachment indicates the subpoena involves the Sacramento County Clerk.
EFTA00010195.pdf
This document is a redacted email dated December 2, 2020. It contains no body text other than a URL linking to a document on the Electronic Case Files (ECF) system for the Southern District of New York (NYSD) court. The email includes two attachments, one being a PDF.
DOJ-OGR-00000225.tif
This document outlines the conviction and sentencing of a petitioner for their role in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse network between approximately 1994 and 2004. The petitioner was found guilty of conspiring to transport minors for sexual activity, transporting minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking of a minor, receiving a 240-month prison sentence. The document details the pattern of abuse involving identifying vulnerable girls, isolating them, and paying them for sexualized massages, which took place at Epstein's residences in Palm Beach, Florida, and New York City.
DOJ-OGR-00015079.jpg
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, dated August 4, 2025. The Government is responding to a court order to provide more information about grand jury materials it has moved to unseal in the criminal cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the specific information requested by the court, which includes dates of grand jury presentations, exhibits shown, and the government's position on unsealing these materials.
DOJ-OGR-00015060.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed on July 25, 2025, by National Security Counselors on behalf of MSW Media, Inc. to intervene in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The motion concerns the unsealing of grand jury transcripts, triggered by an instruction from President Trump to Attorney General Pam Bondi. MSW Media seeks to ensure that while victim information is protected, the identities of the Defendant's 'partners in crime or clients' are not redacted under the guise of privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00015054.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 22, 2025, from defense attorneys David Oscar Markus and Melissa Madrigal to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests permission to review grand jury transcripts that the government is seeking to unseal, noting that they have not previously seen them in their entirety. The letter states that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has no objection to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00015035.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on January 15, 2025, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330). It notifies parties that a transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, has been filed and outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes public.
DOJ-OGR-00014853.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal opinion (likely from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction. It lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant). The text, authored by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, summarizes Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy related to minors, as well as her sentencing of concurrent prison terms.
DOJ-OGR-00014852.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for conspiracy, transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity, and sex trafficking. Maxwell's appeal raised five issues, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement barred her prosecution and other procedural matters. The court found no errors in the District Court's handling of the case and affirmed the judgment of conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00014851.jpg
This document is the cover page for a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding case number 22-1426-cr, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The case was argued on March 12, 2024, and decided on September 17, 2024, by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier. The appeal originates from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00014850.jpg
This legal document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed and issued on December 2, 2024. The court, after hearing the appeal, affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00008394.jpg
This legal document is the second page of a filing by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. The prosecution cites several legal precedents to counter the defense's anticipated arguments regarding the government's motives and the thoroughness of the investigation. The document concludes by stating that the government is not seeking any specific relief at this time.
DOJ-OGR-00008354.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on December 10, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). The document announces the filing of an official transcript from a conference held on November 23, 2021. It also outlines the procedure and seven-day deadline for parties to request redactions of personal information before the transcript becomes publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00008263.jpg
This is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on December 8, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr 330). The notice, signed by Court Reporter Rebecca Forman, informs parties that the transcript for a conference held on November 11, 2021, has been filed and outlines the timeline and rules for requesting redactions of personal data.
DOJ-OGR-00001825.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on November 9, 2020, dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Maxwell sought to appeal a lower court's denial of her request to modify a protective order and attempted to consolidate this with the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' civil case. The court outlines legal precedents regarding the 'final judgment rule' and 'collateral order exception' to justify the dismissal.
DOJ-OGR-00001758.jpg
This legal document, dated August 17, 2020, is a filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. It argues for the court's discretion in handling certain materials, citing legal precedent from the Second Circuit for staying civil proceedings during a related criminal case to protect Fifth Amendment rights. The filing also discusses the proper jurisdiction for interpreting a protective order from a separate civil case, suggesting the government has previously agreed that the civil court, not this criminal court, is the appropriate forum.
DOJ-OGR-00001578.jpg
This document is page 16 of an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, detailing 'Count Six' against Ghislaine Maxwell for Perjury. It alleges that on July 22, 2016, during a deposition for a civil case (15 Civ. 7433), Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony regarding her knowledge of sex toys at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00001577.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on or about April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls. The indictment presents this as false testimony, referencing Maxwell's alleged role in transporting a minor from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001517.jpg
This document is page 17 of 18 from an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 6, 2020. It outlines Count Six (Perjury) against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging she knowingly made false material declarations during a deposition on July 22, 2016, related to civil case 15 Civ. 7344. The specific false testimony cited involves her denial of knowledge regarding sex toys or devices at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity