MR. SCHECTMAN

Person
Mentions
56
Relationships
14
Events
21
Documents
27

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
14 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Brune
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Conrad
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Ms. Edelstein
Professional
6
2
View
organization The Court
Professional
6
2
View
person Edelstein
Professional
6
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Professional
5
1
View
person Judge
Professional
5
1
View
person Edelstein
Client
5
1
View
person MR. OKULA
Professional
5
1
View
person Brune
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MS. DAVIS
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Brune
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Trzaskoma
Professional
5
1
View
person Edelstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal proceeding A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's pr... N/A View
N/A Court testimony Cross-examination and redirect examination of a witness named Edelstein regarding knowledge of Ju... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Trial A trial in which Conrad served as a juror and David Parse was a defendant. N/A View
N/A Court testimony Direct examination of witness Brune by an unnamed questioner, with objections from Mr. Schectman ... Courtroom View
N/A Court testimony Redirect and recross-examination of witness Brune. Implied to be a court in th... View
N/A Court proceeding Redirect examination of witness Edelstein. Courtroom View
N/A Trip The underlying trial in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. Courtroom View
N/A Court testimony Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant informati... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Court hearing Recross-examination of witness Brune regarding a fraud alert, Social Security numbers, and the di... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Laura Edelstein Courtroom View
2025-11-05 Meeting A conversation took place regarding a suspended lawyer having the same name as a juror. the plaza View
2022-03-24 Court proceeding A court hearing where one witness (Ms. Brune) is excused and another (Laura Joy Edelstein) is cal... Courtroom View
2022-02-24 Court testimony Direct examination of witness Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant information' conc... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-02-24 Court testimony Redirect and recross examination of witness Brune regarding their interpretation of a document, t... Southern District View
2022-02-24 N/A Court proceeding where Ms. Brune is excused and Laurie Edelstein is called as a government witness. Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-02-24 Court testimony Recross-examination of witness Brune by Mr. Schectman and the Court. Courtroom View
2022-02-22 Court proceeding Testimony of witness Edelstein, being questioned by Mr. Okula in the presence of Mr. Schectman an... N/A View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceedings in United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. Courtroom View
2012-02-15 Court hearing Direct examination of witness Conrad in the case of U.S. v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The questio... Southern District of New York View
2012-02-15 Court testimony Court testimony of a juror, Ms. Conrad, being questioned about her background and potential biase... Courtroom View
2012-02-15 Court testimony Court hearing featuring the direct and cross-examination of witness/juror Ms. Conrad regarding he... Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00009339.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on Feb 24, 2022. Witness 'Brune' is being questioned about when they became aware of research conducted by their colleague Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Catherine Conrad (Juror 50). The testimony focuses on whether Brune was included in email traffic regarding this research prior to jury deliberations. Attorneys Schectman and Davis argue over the timestamp (West Coast vs East Coast) of a specific note.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Brune, who is being questioned about her assessment of potentially significant information regarding a juror and whether it should have been raised with a Judge Pauley. The transcript includes legal objections and rulings, indicating a contentious line of questioning.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity