Event Details
November 05, 2025
Description
A conversation took place regarding a suspended lawyer having the same name as a juror.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | person | 82 | View Entity |
| MR. SCHECTMAN | person | 56 | View Entity |
| Ms. Trzaskoma | person | 103 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009414.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a cross-examination where Mr. Schectman is questioned by Ms. Edelstein. The questioning centers on why Schectman and his colleagues, Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma, failed to inform the court after discovering on May 12th that a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad shared the same name as Juror No. 1. Schectman defends their decision, stating they concluded it was 'inconceivable' that the juror was the same person, and denies any attempt to 'sandbag the Court'.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Investigation requested by Ms. Trzaskoma.
0012-05-01 • Unknown
A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.
Date unknown
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.
Date unknown • The Court
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Cross-examination and redirect examination of a witness named Edelstein regarding knowledge of Juror No. 1's status as a suspended lawyer.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event