Starr

Person

Mentions

Relationships

Events

Documents

Also known as:

Lefkowitz (authored), Starr (transmitted)

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

36 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person Lefkowitz	Professional	8 Strong	4	View
person Epstein	Client	8 Strong	4	View
person Acosta	Professional	8 Strong	3	View
person Lefkowitz	Business associate	6	2	View
person Acosta	Professional adversarial	5	1	View
person Roth	Professional adversarial	5	1	View
person Acosta	Adversarial professional	5	1	View
person Acosta	Defense prosecution negotiation	5	1	View
person Oosterbaan	Adversarial	5	1	View
person Whitley	Business associate	5	1	View
person Acosta	Legal representative	5	1	View
person Whitley	Professional	5	1	View
person Roth	Professional	5	1	View
organization Pepperdine Law	Professional	5	1	View
person Lefkowitz	Co counsel	5	1	View
person Acosta	Adversarial negotiating	5	1	View
person Acosta	Corresponded	2	2	View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN	Client	1	1	View
person Acosta	Correspondent official interaction	1	1	View
person Lourie	Communicated with	1	1	View
person Lefkowitz	Collaborated on defense submissions	1	1	View
person Martin Weinberg	Collaborated on defense	1	1	View
person John Roth	Correspondence handled by	1	1	View
person Lefkowitz	Collaborated on response	1	1	View
person Acosta	Correspondent	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	Legal dispute	Dispute between the prosecution (Sloman) and defense (Starr, Lefkowitz) over the notification of ...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	Narrator worked at Kirkland & Ellis.	Kirkland & Ellis	View
N/A	N/A	John Roth handled Starr's letter and reviewed materials related to the Epstein matter, limiting h...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	Deputy Attorney General Filip stated he had never heard of Epstein before receiving Starr's letter.	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	The defense team rejected Acosta's December 19, 2007, NPA modification letter.	N/A	View
2008-06-27	N/A	Starr sends concluding email to Acosta regarding the Epstein matter.	N/A	View
2008-06-23	Legal communication	Roth sent a letter to Starr and Lefkowitz concluding the federal review of the Epstein case.	N/A	View
2008-06-23	N/A	Roth sends letter to Starr and Lefkowitz regarding USAO's review of the Epstein matter.	N/A	View
2008-06-23	Communication	Roth sent a letter to Starr and Lefkowitz regarding the conclusion of a review into the USAO's ha...	N/A	View
2008-05-27	Communication	Starr and Whitley sent a second letter to the Deputy Attorney General, arguing the need for revie...	N/A	View
2008-05-19	Communication	Starr and Whitley co-authored a letter to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip asking for a review ...	N/A	View
2008-05-14	Letter	Starr sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General Fisher reiterating complaints and requesting a ...	N/A	View
2008-05-13	Conversation	Starr spoke with Assistant Attorney General Fisher.	N/A	View
2008-03-12	Meeting	A meeting between Epstein's defense team and DOJ officials to discuss the case. It was described ...	The Department (DOJ)	View
2008-03-12	N/A	Starr and Lefkowitz made multiple written submissions to the Criminal Division regarding USAO act...	Unspecified	View
2008-03-12	N/A	Meeting attended by Starr, Lefkowitz, Weinberg (Epstein defense team), and Oosterbaan, Mandelker,...	Unspecified	View
2008-03-12	Communication	Starr spoke to Assistant Attorney General Fisher, making it clear the defense team would want an ...	N/A	View
2008-03-06	Communication	Acosta alerted Sloman and Oosterbaan that Starr and Lefkowitz had called him to express concern a...	N/A	View
2008-01-07	N/A	Defense presents USAO improprieties and 'watered-down' resolution	Unknown	View
2008-01-07	Phone call	Acosta and Sloman spoke with Epstein's defense team about a media leak and their desire for a 'wa...	N/A	View
2008-01-07	N/A	Phone conference following meeting	Phone	View
2007-12-19	N/A	Acosta sent a letter to Sanchez proposing revised language for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA...	N/A	View
2007-12-14	N/A	Meeting between Acosta, USAO personnel, Starr, and Lefkowitz regarding the Epstein matter.	Unknown (likely USAO office)	View
2007-12-14	N/A	Meeting: Defense presents federal jurisdiction issues, legal issues, and request for de novo review	Unknown	View
2007-12-14	N/A	Meeting in Miami between Acosta, USAO representatives, and Epstein's defense team (Starr, Dershow...	Miami	View

DOJ-OGR-00021262.jpg

This legal document details events in the Jeffrey Epstein case from 2007, focusing on the circulation of a draft non-prosecution agreement (NPA) by USAO attorney Villafaña. It describes a key meeting on September 7, 2007, where Epstein's defense attorneys, including Starr, met with prosecutors, including Acosta, to argue against federal charges. Starr specifically appealed to Acosta by highlighting their shared experience as Senate-confirmed officials.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021191.jpg

This document is a table of contents from a legal filing, detailing the timeline of plea negotiations in the Jeffrey Epstein case from July to September 2007. It outlines key events, including meetings between the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO), the FBI, and Epstein's defense team, and chronicles the evolution of the plea agreement terms, such as the reduction of the proposed incarceration period. The document highlights the roles of specific attorneys, including Acosta, Villafaña, and Lourie, in the negotiation process.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00003312.jpg

This document details communications from late June 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It begins with a letter from Roth to Epstein's counsel, Starr and Lefkowitz, confirming that federal prosecution is appropriate, and then shifts to prosecutor Villafaña's efforts to enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña expresses strong suspicion that Epstein's attorneys are misrepresenting the terms of his confinement, telling her he would be in a jail 24/7 while planning for him to be at a less restrictive 'stockade', which she reports to a colleague, Sloman, as a violation of their agreement.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00003303.jpg

This document details events in early January 2008 concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case, starting with the postponement of a plea hearing due to issues with the state charge. It describes a meeting where defense attorney Sanchez alleged a media leak by the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) and pushed for a lenient plea deal, followed by a phone call where Epstein's full legal team reiterated their desire for a 'watered-down resolution'. Amid these negotiations, USAO personnel expressed concern about delays and initiated a full internal review of the investigation.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022018.jpg

This text, likely from a memoir or legal account, defends a controversial prosecution decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The author argues that the plea deal was the best possible outcome given the evidence and victim reluctance at the time, ensuring jail time and sex offender registration rather than risking a failed trial. The passage also criticizes the defense's tactics, including personal investigations into prosecutors, while acknowledging frustrations with Epstein's treatment in state custody.

Book excerpt / legal memoir

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010523.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a book detailing the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein in July 2006, specifically focusing on the perspective of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It describes the grand jury's decision to charge Epstein with a single count of solicitation, omitting charges related to minors, and notes the lack of notification to the police regarding his surrender and release on bail. The text also touches on Reiter's interactions with federal prosecutor Acosta.

Book excerpt / evidence document

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Epstein matter

From: Starr

To: OPR/John Roth

Letter received by OPR and handled by John Roth.

Letter

N/A

Communication Source

Concluding the matter

From: Starr

To: ["Acosta"]

Starr sent a concluding email to Acosta, expressing unhappiness with the government's treatment of his client (Epstein) but acknowledging their legal defeat and wishing for closure without ill will.

N/A

Communication Source

Victim notification

From: Starr

To: Acosta

Starr complained that the government inappropriately provided oral notification of a victim letter to a girl's attorney.

Complaint

N/A

Communication Source

Concluding email on Epstein matter

From: Starr

To: Acosta

Acknowledged they reached 'the end of a long and arduous road,' expressed unhappiness with government's treatment of his client, but recognized appellate motions lost, seeking closure.

2008-06-27

Communication Source

Complaints regarding Epstein case

From: Starr

To: ["Assistant Attorney G...

Starr thanked Fisher for speaking with him, reiterated the defense team's complaints, and requested a meeting with her, Lefkowitz, and Whitley.

Letter

2008-05-14

Communication Source

Substantive challenges to NPA and Epstein investigation, ...

From: Starr

To: Acosta

Starr transmitted two lengthy submissions authored by Lefkowitz to Acosta, challenging the NPA and the conduct of the Epstein investigation, and raising concerns about victim notification.

Submissions/letter

2007-12-11

Communication Source

Challenges to NPA and Investigation Conduct

From: Starr

To: Acosta

Transmitted two lengthy submissions authored by Lefkowitz challenging the NPA and the 'background and conduct of the investigation'. One 20-page submission criticized Villafaña and federal overreaching, another 13-page submission reiterated complaints about § 2255 component of NPA.

Letter and submissions

2007-12-11

Communication Source

Substantive challenges to NPA and investigation into Epstein

From: Starr

To: Acosta

Starr transmitted two lengthy submissions authored by Lefkowitz. These submissions presented challenges to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the conduct of the Epstein investigation, particularly regarding victim notification issues.

Submission

2007-12-11

Communication Source

Substantive challenges to NPA and Epstein investigation, ...

From: Starr

To: Acosta

Starr transmitted two lengthy submissions authored by Lefkowitz to Acosta, challenging the NPA and the conduct of the Epstein investigation, and raising concerns about victim notification.

Submissions/letter

2007-12-11

Communication Source

Deadline for 'Affirmation'

From: Acosta

To: Starr

Set a deadline for the defense to transmit Epstein's 'Affirmation'.

Letter

2007-12-04

Communication Source

Directive regarding victim notification letters

From: Acosta

To: Starr

Acosta informed defense counsel Starr that he had directed prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters until 5 p.m. on December 7 to give the defense time to review options.

Letter

2007-11-30

Communication Source