An email exchange between Larry Summers and an individual identified as 'J' discussing relationship dynamics described metaphorically as a 'game.' They debate the appropriateness of sending written notes versus face-to-face communication, with references to an 'exit strategy' and a potential meeting in Beijing.
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein). Summers discusses an 'exit strategy' regarding a woman he might see in Beijing, while J advises him against sending a written note to end things, comparing such an action to 'Trump firing Comey' and urging him to handle it face-to-face with dignity.
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein). Summers discusses an 'exit strategy' regarding a woman he might see in Beijing, while J advises him against sending a written note to end things, comparing such an action to 'Trump firing Comey' and urging him to handle it face-to-face with dignity.
This document is an email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the known Epstein address jeevacation@gmail.com). They discuss a personal situation involving Summers and an unnamed woman, with Summers mentioning an 'exit strategy' and a plan to see her in Beijing, while Epstein critiques Summers' approach, mentioning 'rules of the game' and 'her freedoms.' The emails include standard legal disclaimers asserting the content is the property of 'JEE'.
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation'). Summers discusses a personal 'exit strategy' regarding a woman he expects to see in Beijing, mentioning her 'bad behavior.' Epstein replies with advice, criticizing Summers' uncertainty and discussing 'the rules of the game.'
This document is an email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation revolves around Summers' 'exit strategy' for a relationship with an unnamed woman, with Epstein advising Summers against sending a written note to end things, comparing such an action to 'Trump firing Comey.' Summers mentions a potential future meeting with the woman in Beijing.
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the jeevacation@gmail.com alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation revolves around Summers' conflict with an unidentified woman, with Epstein offering advice on how to handle communication and an 'exit strategy,' using analogies to football and Donald Trump firing James Comey. The subject line 'Call from New Yorker' suggests the conversation may have been prompted by media inquiries, though the body text focuses on interpersonal relationship dynamics.
An email exchange dated March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the jeevacation@gmail.com address associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation involves an 'exit strategy', a plan involving an unnamed woman's 'freedoms', and Summers' intention to ignore her 'bad behavior' during a potential meeting in Beijing. The document includes a standard legal disclaimer asserting the content is the property of 'JEE'.
This document is page 3 of a printout of a New York Times opinion article dated May 29, 2019, authored by former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. The text analyzes the trade war between the Trump administration and China, discussing nationalism and negotiating strategies. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033367' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as an attachment to an email or file in a larger investigation, though the specific connection to Epstein is not contained in the text of this specific page.
This New York Times opinion piece discusses the escalating trade war between the US and China, detailing three new "red lines" set by Beijing regarding tariffs and purchasing agreements that make a deal increasingly difficult. The author observes that recent US actions, including leaks and sanctions against Huawei, have pushed China toward a more adversarial stance, with leadership now questioning the value of a trade deal and preparing for a potential Cold War.
This document is a printout of a New York Times opinion piece discussing the deteriorating trade negotiations between the US and China in May 2019. It details China's establishment of three "red lines" regarding tariffs and purchasing agreements, and suggests that recent US actions, including leaks and moves against Huawei, have pushed Beijing toward a more adversarial stance and away from a trade deal.
This document is a printout of a New York Times opinion piece by Kevin Rudd dated May 29, 2019, discussing the US-China trade war. It argues that President Trump's rhetoric empowers Chinese economic nationalism, drawing parallels to historical events like the May Fourth Movement of 1919. While the content focuses on geopolitics, the document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033365', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a screenshot of a New York Times article dated January 15, 2017, titled 'After 'Downton,' Affluent Chinese Seek Butlers.' It discusses the rising trend of butler services in China and interviews trainers Neal Yeh and Christopher Noble. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032435', indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to communications involving Jeffrey Epstein or financial institutions, though Epstein is not mentioned in the text of this specific page.
This document is a screenshot of a New York Times digital article dated January 15, 2017, discussing the rise of English-style butlers in China among the affluent. It features quotes from trainers Neal Yeh and Christopher Noble regarding the International Butler Academy China in Chengdu. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032435', indicating it is part of a larger document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, though the content itself is unrelated to Epstein or criminal activity on its face.
This document appears to be page 215 of a House Oversight Committee report regarding Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Moscow in June 2013. It details his strategic planning, including job changes, financial preparation, and communications with Laura Poitras and Julian Assange. The text analyzes his lack of visa applications to other regions and suggests his movement to Russia was a calculated decision involving coordination with Russian officials. Note: This document focuses entirely on Edward Snowden and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, page 107 of a House Oversight record, details the logistics of Edward Snowden's escape from Hong Kong in June 2013. It describes how Wikileaks associate Sarah Harrison, under Julian Assange's direction, used tradecraft such as burner phones and decoy flight bookings (to Beijing and New Delhi) to evade US intelligence before securing a flight to Moscow. The text also analyzes the financial state of Wikileaks at the time and the diplomatic tension regarding extradition between the US, Hong Kong, and China.
This document appears to be a page (185) from a geopolitical manuscript or white paper discussing network theory, 'Hard Gatekeeping,' and the balance of power between the US and China. It references historical hegemony and political science theories by Kauffman, Little, and Wohlforth. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was produced as evidence in a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a book or manuscript (specifically referencing 'The Seventh Sense,' a concept and likely book title) analyzing US-China relations through the lens of network theory. It argues that China is not currently a military threat to the US but faces significant internal demographic and economic challenges. The text draws parallels to the diplomatic rapprochement of the 1970s, citing Nixon and Kissinger's efforts to engage with Zhou Enlai to avoid Chinese isolation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, potentially related to documents possessed by or sent to Epstein associates.
This text outlines a grand strategy for US foreign policy regarding China, advocating for a "gatekept order" rather than direct containment. It argues for creating a strong network based on US values that other nations can join conditionally, while urging cooperation on global issues to avoid fatal conflict. The passage also introduces the concept of "Seventh Sense" logic, comparing geopolitical shifts to complex adaptive systems in nature.
This document (page 180, Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412) appears to be a page from a geopolitical strategy manuscript or policy paper. It analyzes US-China relations, arguing that traditional containment strategies are failing (citing the AIIB example from 2014) and discussing cultural differences in transparency ('diamonds vs jade'). The author proposes that the greatest threat is not a specific nation but the 'evolution of the network itself' and suggests a grand strategy of 'Hard Gatekeeping' modeled after Metternich's 'Concert of Nations'.
The text explores the geopolitical tension between the United States and China, comparing their relationship to historical rivalries like Germany and Great Britain to illustrate the dangers of the "security dilemma." It discusses how each nation's pursuit of security often leads to mutual insecurity and highlights their fundamentally different perceptions of the current global order—America viewing it as sustainable and beneficial, while China sees it as broken and in need of reconstruction ("Da po, Da li").
This document appears to be page 167 of a book manuscript (Chapter Ten: Defense in Depth), marked as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. The text recounts the author's meeting in Beijing with retired Chinese diplomat Huang Hua, discussing the philosophical differences between Western goal-oriented thinking and Chinese assessment of the 'nature of the age.' It contrasts the eras of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, specifically regarding their foreign policy and stance on the likelihood of war.
This document is page 156 of a book or manuscript, likely titled 'The Seventh Sense' (based on the text), bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text discusses political theory, the definition of power ('Macht' as defined by Max Weber), and the concept of a 'Seventh Sense' needed to understand modern networks, referencing entities like Facebook, Bitcoin, and operating systems as 'gated' worlds. It does not contain specific references to Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or financial transactions on this specific page.
This document appears to be page 152 of a historical book or manuscript discussing the history of colonialism, the opium wars in China, and the rise of industrial warfare (specifically the Maxim and Gatling guns). It references historical figures like Lin Zexu, Queen Victoria, Lincoln, and Bismarck. While the text itself is historical non-fiction, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018384' indicates it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger investigation file (possibly related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial records or associates, where such a book or manuscript might have been found in evidence).
This document is a data log, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028386', containing snippets of news articles from The New York Times, likely aggregated by Apple News around September 23-24, 2018. The content covers President Trump's diplomatic activities at the U.N., the implementation of U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods, a medical breakthrough in heart failure treatment, and Bill Cosby's sentencing. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity