Florida Bar
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Frederick
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Shankman
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of Florida Bar complaint against Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2010-09-21 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint with the Florida Bar against Bradley J. Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2010-09-21 | N/A | The Florida Bar investigated and dismissed Epstein's complaint against Edwards. | Florida | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023248.tif
This document is page 210 of a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal deliberations and external pressure regarding victim notification in the Epstein case during October 2007. It highlights defense attorney Lefkowitz's aggressive efforts to prevent the government from notifying victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), arguing it would violate confidentiality. It also details an internal ethics consultation where a Professional Responsibility Officer advised prosecutors to stop notifying victims if they were concerned about impeachment material.
DOJ-OGR-00015095.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal document (Document 803) filed on August 5, 2025, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The filing, submitted by the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC and signed by attorney David Oscar Markus, argues that the government's motion to unseal grand jury materials should be denied. The document also lists attorney Melissa Madrigal and provides contact information for the firm.
DOJ-OGR-00008377.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 15, 2021, is a motion from the prosecution arguing against allowing testimony from an individual named Scarola. The prosecution contends that Scarola's proposed testimony regarding another witness, Carolyn, is irrelevant and non-impeaching, as the information has already been obtained from Carolyn directly. The document also details over $3.2 million in compensation Carolyn received from claims related to Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and discusses a 2020 meeting where Scarola showed Carolyn a picture of an Epstein associate.
DOJ-OGR-00001386.jpg
This document is the concluding page of a legal filing from April 19, 2021, submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus of the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC. The filing argues that a female client's case should be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because her conditions of confinement are making it impossible to prepare for trial. The document provides the law firm's contact information in Miami, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00000319.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing submitted on July 9, 2010, by the office of the United States Attorney. It lists Wifredo A. Ferrer as the U.S. Attorney and Dexter A. Lee, Eduardo I. Sánchez, and A. Marie Villafaña as Assistant U.S. Attorneys representing the respondent, providing their contact information and Florida Bar numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00030460.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 6, 2006, is a 'Waiver of Speedy Trial' for the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The document, signed by Epstein's attorney Jack A. Goldberger, formally relinquishes the defendant's right to a speedy trial. It also certifies that copies were mailed to the State Attorney's Office and to Epstein himself.
DOJ-OGR-00030456.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated January 2, 2008. It confirms service or address to Lanna Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach and is signed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. The document bears Department of Justice Bates stamps and public records request identifiers from 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00030451.jpg
This is a letter dated February 22, 2007, from the law firm Atterbury Goldberger Weiss, representing Jeffrey Epstein, to Lanna Belohlavek of the Office of the State Attorney. The letter follows up on a previous meeting and lists eleven specific items of evidence, such as interview transcripts, call logs, and voicemails involving individuals like Haley Robson, Melissa Eaton, and Johanna Sjoberg, that the law firm has determined are missing from the discovery materials provided to them. This document highlights a formal request for missing evidence in the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00030443.jpg
This is a letter dated December 21, 2007, from attorney Jack A. Goldberger to Judge Sandra McSorley regarding the criminal case 'State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein'. Goldberger submits an agreed motion and a proposed order to continue the trial, cancel an upcoming plea conference, and schedule a new status conference. The letter requests the judge's signature to approve these changes to the case schedule.
DOJ-OGR-00021480.jpg
This document is an excerpt from an OPR report (DOJ-OGR-00021480) analyzing whether Prosecutor Villafaña committed professional misconduct by omitting information about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) when speaking with victims and attorney Edwards. OPR concluded that her conduct did not amount to making affirmative false statements, noting that she believed the investigation was ongoing until Epstein's June 2008 state plea and had advocated for charging him. The text cites Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) and related case law regarding candor and omissions.
DOJ-OGR-00021479.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report analyzing whether prosecutor Villafaña violated Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) by failing to disclose the existence of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to victims and attorney Edwards. It references specific interviews conducted by Villafaña on January 31 and February 1, 2008, where she allegedly stated the matter was 'under investigation' despite knowing the NPA was signed. The text cites the Eleventh Circuit's concern that the government's actions moved from passive nondisclosure to active misrepresentation.
DOJ-OGR-00021455.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal filing, specifically an exhibit (SA-279) filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) and later in an appellate case (22-1426). The text outlines specific Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC), focusing on candor in dealing with others and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, likely used to argue that attorneys involved in the underlying case (potentially the Epstein plea deal) violated ethical standards regarding honesty and misrepresentation.
DOJ-OGR-00021428.jpg
This document details events in April and May 2008 concerning the federal investigation into Epstein, highlighting prosecutors' frustration with delays caused by the defense's appeal to the Department's Criminal Division. It captures communications showing officials, including Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman, were concerned about victims losing patience and were contemplating filing charges. Concurrently, it describes a separate legal discussion where USAO supervisors, prompted by an unrelated complaint, affirmed their position that victims' rights under the CVRA are only triggered once formal charges are filed.
DOJ-OGR-00021410.jpg
This document details the complex discussions and objections surrounding victim notification in a legal case, likely involving Epstein, during late 2007. It highlights concerns raised by the FBI and defense attorneys, particularly Lefkowitz, about the implications of direct victim contact, including potential impeachment material, confidentiality breaches, and grand jury secrecy rules. Various parties, including Villafaña, case agents, and the USAO's Professional Responsibility Officer, navigated these issues, with Villafaña also raising ethical concerns about 'cold calling' victims under Florida Bar Rules.
DOJ-OGR-00021331.jpg
This document appears to be page 131 of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed as an exhibit in court. It analyzes Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) 4-8.4 regarding attorney misconduct, specifically dishonesty and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. A footnote clarifies that while OPR examined FRPC 4-3.8 and ABA standards, OPR does not consider ABA standards binding on Department of Justice prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00021330.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines several of the Florida Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) that are applicable to attorneys practicing before the court. The page details the rules for Competence (FRPC 4-1.1), Diligence (FRPC 4-1.3), and Candor in Dealing with Others (FRPC 4-4.1), providing explanations and context from the official comments to these rules.
DOJ-OGR-00021215.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive tactics used by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, including a threat by attorney Alan Dershowitz to 'destroy' witnesses. It also explains the Florida State Attorney's Office's decision to present the case to a grand jury, citing a conflict of interest involving prosecutor Krischer's husband and Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger, as well as the complexities of the case and the victim-witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00031671.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 10, 2008, from attorney Aileen Josephs to attorney Guy Lewis concerning his client, Mr. Epstein. Josephs advises Lewis against attacking the victim(s) in the case, citing concern from women in the community, and warns him about the legal realities of a potential libel suit and the lack of a valid defense for statutory rape. The letter was also copied to the State Attorney's Office and the Palm Beach Chief of Police, indicating a formal effort to put her concerns on the record with law enforcement.
DOJ-OGR-00031669.jpg
This document is a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request letter dated August 14, 2006, from attorney Aileen Josephs to Florida State Attorney Barry Krischer. Josephs requests the complete file related to the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. A handwritten note on the document, dated November 8, 2007, indicates that over a year had passed and counsel had not received a response to the request.
DOJ-OGR-00031666.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 8, 2008, from attorney Aileen Josephs to attorney Lanna Belohlavek concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case (2005CF009454A). Josephs expresses frustration over a pending Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from 2006 and raises concerns about a lack of transparency, alleging that hearing dates are being changed "orally" without public record. She insists on being notified of all future hearing dates to ensure government transparency and prevent "sub rosa dealings."
DOJ-OGR-00031661.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 8, 2008, from attorney Aileen Josephs to attorney Lanna Belohlavek concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case (2005CF009454A). Josephs expresses concern that hearing dates are being changed 'orally' and without public record, despite the case being an 'active investigation,' which undermines transparency. She references a pending Freedom of Information request from 2006 and formally requests to be notified of all future hearing dates related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00031565.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a request for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion asks the court to require that depositions for a criminal case and a civil case, 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein', be conducted at the same time to prevent harassment of the witness by Defendant Epstein. The filing states that counsel for the State and for Epstein were contacted about this request but have not responded.
DOJ-OGR-00031558.jpg
This document is the final page (page 3) of a legal motion filed on February 5, 2008, by attorney Theodore J. Leopold on behalf of a 'Jane Doe' victim. The motion requests a Protective Order against Jeffrey Epstein and his counsel, alleging systematic harassment, including an incident where an unidentified male claiming to be an attorney approached the victim at her workplace. The document asserts these actions are inflicting further emotional injury on a young girl already 'scarred for life'.
DOJ-OGR-00031312.jpg
This is a Nolle Prosse document filed on October 25, 2005, in the County Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, for case number 05-23062MMA00. The State of Florida, represented by State Attorney Barry E. Krischer, formally dropped charges against a redacted defendant. The reason for the dismissal is noted as "CSW DONE," which likely stands for 'Community Service Work Done'.
DOJ-OGR-00003217.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive legal tactics employed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, including attorney Alan Dershowitz threatening a prosecutor to destroy witnesses. It also outlines the State Attorney's Office's rationale for taking the case to a grand jury, citing the complexity of the case and the problematic possibility that Epstein's minor victims could have been prosecuted for prostitution under the existing state law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity