Florida Bar
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Frederick
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Shankman
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of Florida Bar complaint against Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2010-09-21 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint with the Florida Bar against Bradley J. Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2010-09-21 | N/A | The Florida Bar investigated and dismissed Epstein's complaint against Edwards. | Florida | View |
DOJ-OGR-00031070.jpg
This is a Nolle Prosse document from the County Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated October 25, 2005. It indicates that the State of Florida is dropping charges against a defendant (whose name is redacted) in case number 05-23062MMA00. The reason for the dismissal is noted as "CSW DONE," which stands for Community Service Work Done.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019298.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal team (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP) complaining that the plaintiff (Giuffre) leaked selective, confidential information to the Washington Post to damage Dershowitz. The letter attempts to discredit a specific redacted witness (Ms. [Redacted]) by citing her 2016 emails which contained outlandish conspiracy theories involving the CIA, 'the Russians,' and 'Special Agents Forces Men.' The document details the witness's claims of possessing compromising sexual evidence against high-profile figures including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Richard Branson, and Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022177.jpg
This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich,' stamped as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the contentious legal battle between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney [Brad] Edwards, describing Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards as a desperate attempt by a 'serial pedophile' to silence victims' advocates. It also discusses Sarah Kellen using the alias 'Clara' to rent property in Palm Beach in April 2009 and mentions prosecutors considering Kellen and Marcinkova as potential co-conspirators.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg
This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') detailing the legal maneuvering between lawyer Bradley Edwards and Alan Dershowitz. It describes how Edwards briefly worked for Scott Rothstein's fraudulent firm in 2009, a fact Dershowitz later used to argue that accusations against him by Virginia Roberts were part of an extortion plot hatched by Edwards to overturn Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The text notes that Edwards was cleared of knowledge regarding Rothstein's Ponzi scheme.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020663.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal letter from the firm Mishcon de Reya, representing Alan Dershowitz. It vigorously denies allegations that Dershowitz had sex with a redacted accuser (likely Virginia Giuffre) at the behest of Jeffrey Epstein, labeling the accuser a 'fantasist' who has made wild claims about other high-profile figures like Donald Trump and the Clintons. The letter asserts these allegations are part of a campaign orchestrated by lawyer David Boies, against whom Dershowitz has filed a bar complaint.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010607.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service signed by attorney Jack Scarola on November 4, 2010. It certifies that copies of a preceding legal filing were served via Fax and U.S. Mail to a service list. The document lists the contact information for the law firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010607.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010603.jpg
This document page (38) details legal maneuvers between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards. It establishes that the U.S. Attorney's Office cleared Edwards of involvement in Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, identifying him instead as a victim. It further describes Epstein's failed attempt to file a Florida Bar complaint against Edwards and highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during a March 2010 deposition regarding his claims against Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010504.jpg
This document contains pages 162 and 163 from a book (likely a narrative non-fiction like 'Filthy Rich') detailing the background of State Attorney Barry Krischer and incidents related to the Epstein investigation. Page 162 describes witness intimidation involving a woman named Alison being offered money to refuse cooperation, and mentions a private investigator named Ivan Robles monitoring visitors. Page 163 provides a biographical overview of Barry Krischer, noting his career history, awards from figures like Jeb Bush, and his reputation for prosecuting high-profile cases like Rush Limbaugh.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013474.jpg
This document is the final page of an affidavit signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards on September 21, 2010. In it, Edwards states that Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint against him with the Florida Bar alleging involvement in 'Rothstein's scheme,' which the Bar investigated and dismissed. Edwards affirms that his actions in prosecuting claims against Epstein were ethical and based on good faith beliefs representing his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013468.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards outlines his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña, alleging that the prosecution failed to inform him of a secret non-prosecution agreement and withheld evidence despite admitting to having proof of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit highlights the timeline of the plea deal and the subsequent revelation that federal prosecution would be blocked.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013463.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It details Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), his repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment during depositions to avoid self-incrimination regarding sex crimes against minors, and the depositions of his co-conspirators who were employed to procure underage girls. The document highlights that Jane Doe refused to limit her damages to $150,000 as stipulated in the NPA and asserts that Epstein's co-conspirators helped protect him from law enforcement detection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013439.jpg
A 2011 Daily Telegraph article (part of House Oversight records) details the sentencing of Epstein employee Rodriguez, who stole Epstein's 'black book' as an insurance policy against Epstein and Maxwell. The document quotes Rodriguez's lawyer stating Epstein's sentence might have been harsher had the book been found earlier, and mentions a defamation lawsuit Epstein filed against victim's lawyer Brad Edwards regarding a Ponzi scheme allegation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013400.jpg
This document is page 7 of a 'Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages' in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein. The text aggressively argues that attorney Edwards properly represented three sexual assault victims and that Epstein's subsequent lawsuit against Edwards is a baseless, retaliatory fabrication by a 'serial pedophile' attempting to use his wealth to manipulate the legal system and avoid accountability.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013392.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on November 3, 2011. It is signed by attorney Jack Scarola of the firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, certifying that a preceding legal document was served via Fax and U.S. Mail to a service list. The document is numbered page 23 and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013379.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues against Jeffrey Epstein's claims that attorney Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme or 'pumped' cases to investors. The text defends Edwards' actions as ethical legal advocacy, notes that the lawsuits were filed in 2008 before Edwards knew Scott Rothstein, and highlights that Epstein paid significant settlements in these cases. A footnote mentions that Epstein filed a retaliatory bar complaint against Edwards which was dismissed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013373.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing, likely a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by attorney Edwards. It argues that Edwards properly represented three victims of sexual assault against Jeffrey Epstein and that Epstein's subsequent lawsuit against Edwards is a baseless, retaliatory tactic by a 'serial pedophile' to avoid accountability and public disclosure. The text characterizes Epstein as using his wealth to manipulate the legal system and attacks the credibility of Epstein's 'Second Amended Complaint.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013369.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal affidavit signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards on September 21, 2010. In the text, Edwards attests that Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint against him with the Florida Bar alleging involvement in 'Rothstein's scheme,' which was investigated and dismissed. Edwards declares that his actions in prosecuting claims against Epstein were ethically proper and done in good faith to represent his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013363.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) against Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards describes his interactions with AUSA Marie Villafaña, alleging that the U.S. Attorney's Office withheld critical information regarding a plea agreement that blocked federal prosecution, despite admitting they had evidence of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit outlines the timeline of the plea deal revelation in June and July 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013360.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated November 4, 2010, signed by attorney Jack Scarola of the law firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley. It certifies that a preceding legal document was served via Fax and U.S. Mail to recipients on an attached service list. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp number 013360.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013356.jpg
This legal document outlines legal conflicts between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards in 2010. It confirms that Edwards was officially designated a victim of the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and that a Florida Bar complaint filed by Epstein against Edwards regarding Rothstein was dismissed. The document also details Epstein's March 17, 2010 deposition where he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about his specific allegations against Edwards and about individuals in California Edwards sought to depose.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013494.tif
This affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards details his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, including the filing of state and federal lawsuits. It highlights his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña regarding Epstein's plea agreement and concerns that information about the federal prosecution implications of the state plea was not fully disclosed to his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013489.tif
This affidavit, authored by Bradley James Edwards, details his role as lead attorney for 'Jane Doe' in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government, his invocation of the Fifth Amendment in response to allegations, and his attempts to discredit Jane Doe's testimony. The document also mentions the existence of Epstein's co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes and were deposed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025544.jpg
A first-person narrative, likely by Jeffrey Epstein, detailing legal conflicts and alleged corruption surrounding his prosecution. The document describes the theft of his 'black book' by his houseman Alfredo Rodriguez, the subsequent sting operation, and allegations that attorney Brad Edwards used the stolen book to solicit clients against him. It also details a dispute over excessive legal fees with defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt ($800k in questioned cash) and the hiring of Guy Lewis due to his connections with US Attorney Alex Acosta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029319.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, is a legal defense of attorney Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that Edwards did not 'pump' cases to investors, noting that he filed complaints against Epstein long before meeting Scott Rothstein or joining RRA. The text highlights that Epstein settled three cases (including one for 'Jane Doe') in July 2010 for significant sums via court-ordered mediation presided over by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, and that the Florida Bar dismissed Epstein's ethics complaint against Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029317.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, appears to be page 3 of a legal summary or correspondence regarding a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein against attorney Edwards. The text details how Epstein refused to answer discovery questions regarding a victim identified as 'E.W.' and eventually dismissed his claims against Edwards just before a summary judgment hearing. The document strongly characterizes Epstein as a 'serial pedophile' who used the legal system to intimidate Edwards, who was representing three victims of sexual assault.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity