The Dean
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker (A)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker A
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Professional academic |
1
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013544.jpg
A page from a manuscript or book draft (page 44), produced by the House Oversight Committee. The text is written by an academic or scientist describing the psychological and spiritual effects of long-distance running ('global brain state transition'). The author draws parallels between these physiological states and religious experiences, while also reflecting on personal relationships with their son, students, and university administration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013543.jpg
This document appears to be page 43 of a memoir or manuscript written by an academic scientist (likely an associate of Epstein, given the House Oversight stamp). The text details the narrator's obsessive running habits across various global locations (NYC, Munich, Israel, etc.) and links this physical exertion to spiritual experiences and 'God.' The narrator also discusses professional frustrations, specifically a conflict with a Dean over research space and a rejected NIH grant proposal, which the narrator plans to resubmit for double the funding.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029244.jpg
This document is a partial email from Harvard Professor Elisa New to Jeffrey Epstein. New expresses gratitude for a financial gift from Epstein that legitimized her humanities project at Harvard, secured studio space, and paid staff salaries. She also mentions professional interactions with the Templeton Foundation, Success Academy, and Joe Biden, who agreed to discuss a poem with her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021845.jpg
This document is page 22 of a rough draft legal deposition transcript bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. An attorney (Speaker A) is being questioned about the factual basis for allegations made in a pleading filed on December 30, 2014. The witness defends their actions, stating they firmly believe they had a sufficient basis for the filing, and mentions their history of pro bono work for crime victims and advice received from a 'dean' regarding legal footnotes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021844.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee investigation (indicated by Bates stamp). A witness, who is a law professor at the University of Utah, explains a clerical error regarding a missing footnote in a legal filing ('Exhibit 2'). The witness clarifies that the Dean of the law school did not order a correction after the fact, but rather had previously suggested using such footnotes, and the omission was a simple word processing or copy-paste error that the witness voluntarily corrected upon discovery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021843.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (House Oversight Committee). A witness, likely a law professor at the University of Utah, explains that faculty members express personal views rather than university endorsements, specifically regarding 'crime victim rights.' The witness details a conversation with the law school Dean who suggested adding a footnote to legal pleadings to clarify this distinction and avoid misunderstanding.
Pro bono work and footnotes
The Dean suggested it might be helpful to include a footnote in filings; discussed support for pro bono work.
Departmental Research Space
An aggressive speech regarding the refusal of a request for increased space.
Adding a footnote to pleadings
The Dean suggested adding a footnote to ensure there was no misunderstanding that the professor was speaking for themselves, not the university.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity