Westlaw
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00009352.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from February 24, 2022, where a witness, Ms. Brune, is questioned about her knowledge of a "Westlaw report" and a "Google search." Ms. Brune states she learned about the Westlaw report on July 18th during a discussion with her colleagues, Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein. The questioning reveals the report was allegedly found or provided by a Mr. Benhamou on May 12th.
DOJ-OGR-00009348.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Brune is undergoing direct examination. The witness corrects a previous statement about the timeline of events, clarifying that a key telephone conference handled by Ms. Trzaskoma with the Court occurred on July 18th, not earlier in May. The witness also characterizes another individual, Ms. Edelstein, as being very thorough in her work.
DOJ-OGR-00009342.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. Brune is questioned about a prior conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma, in which they discussed the possibility that Juror No. 1 might be a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they dismissed the idea as nonsensical and asserts confidently that Ms. Trzaskoma never mentioned a Westlaw report on the matter, citing the thorough nature of another colleague, Laurie Edelstein, as the basis for her certainty.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017931.jpg
This document is page 28 of a Westlaw legal report regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). It discusses a legal motion for reconsideration filed by NCB (National Commercial Bank) regarding personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA. The text analyzes legal standards for reconsideration and jurisdiction, citing various precedents (Steel Co., Bush, etc.), but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page, despite the House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the dismissal of claims against the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and Prince Salman and Prince Naif based on the discretionary function exception to sovereign immunity, ruling that their funding decisions were policy-based and thus immune from suit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017912.jpg
This document contains a segment of a court opinion regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, specifically addressing legal claims under the Antiterrorism Act, RICO, and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. It outlines headnotes on legal standards for motions for reconsideration and sovereign immunity, and lists numerous attorneys and law firms representing the plaintiffs and defendants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017911.jpg
This document contains legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', summarizing court rulings related to motions to dismiss claims under the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) and RICO Act. The text outlines specific legal standards regarding the insufficiency of allegations concerning financial support for terrorism and the requirement for specific factual grounds in complaints against organizations and individuals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017907.jpg
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal research printout regarding the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). The page lists legal headnotes defining the standards for personal jurisdiction, conspiracy pleading requirements under New York law, and specific federal jurisdiction rulings concerning Saudi Arabian officials accused of funding terrorism through humanitarian channels. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017907' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023415.jpg
This document appears to be the final page (page 55) of a Westlaw printout related to the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' The text is a fragment of a legal opinion citing 'Terrorist Attacks III' and discussing links between charities and terrorist networks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023415' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely within a larger batch of documents involving financial investigations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023413.jpg
This document contains the footnotes (citations 75-96) from a 2012 legal document titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It references evidentiary exhibits, FBI reports, and Treasury Department documents concerning the financing of terrorism, specifically alleging that senior officers of al Rajhi Bank knowingly sponsored al Qaeda. The document mentions the 'Golden Chain' donor list and cites the 9/11 Commission Monograph on Terrorist Financing multiple times.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023411.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal citation list related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It lists evidence sources including CIA reports, UN Monitoring Group reports, and U.S. Treasury press releases regarding the designation of various individuals (such as Wa'el Hamza Jelaidan and Yassin al Kadi) and organizations (Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Muwafaq Foundation) connected to Al Qaida financing and terrorism support. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It details allegations against financial institutions Dallah al Baraka, ABID Corp, and DMI Trust (and individual Kamel) regarding their long-term financial support of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, dating back to the early 1980s. The text describes money laundering, the maintenance of bank accounts for terrorist front organizations, and the facilitation of funds transfers to operatives in Europe and Sudan. The document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023382.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation, specifically detailing the financial infrastructure of al-Qaeda. It describes the interconnections between Osama bin Laden, various financial institutions (Al Shamal, Faisal Islamic Bank, Tadamon, Al Rajhi Bank), and individuals designated as terrorists or sponsors. It notably discusses the discovery of the 'Golden Chain' document in Bosnia, which identified major financial benefactors of al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023381.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the financial infrastructure supporting al-Qaeda, specifically implicating financial institutions such as Al Shamal, FIBS, Al Rajhi Bank, and National Commercial Bank (NCB) in knowingly providing services and funneling money to the terrorist organization. The text cites testimony confirming that high-ranking banking officials had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and that the banks used charity fronts to channel funds for 'financial jihad.' Note: While labeled as an Epstein-related document request, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it focuses entirely on 9/11 terrorist financing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023380.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation, discussing allegations against various individuals and charities (such as Al Haramain and Muwafaq Foundation) for supporting al-Qaeda. It details designations of individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists and outlines how certain financial institutions, particularly Islamic banks, allegedly facilitated the transfer of resources to al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023377.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) detailing the origins of al-Qaeda. It describes how Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam established the organization from the infrastructure of the Afghan jihad, utilizing a financial network known as the 'Golden Chain' comprised of various Islamic charities. The text also outlines specific fatwas issued by Bin Laden between 1992 and 1998 declaring war on the United States. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content on this specific page relates entirely to terrorism financing and history, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023370.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing or opinion retrieved via Westlaw, related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It lists various US statutes (U.S.C.), state laws (PA, NY), and international resolutions (UN Security Council) cited in the case, along with their corresponding page numbers. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, possibly related to investigations into financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023369.jpg
This document appears to be page 9 of a legal brief or research document (indicated by the Westlaw footer and Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023369) listing a Table of Authorities. It cites numerous legal cases primarily related to terrorism, banking liability, and civil procedure, including 'United States v. Bin Laden' and 'Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC'. While titled under 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001', the document originates from a House Oversight Committee production, likely related to investigations into financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing, marked with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368. It lists various legal precedents and case citations, primarily focusing on litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sovereign immunity, and international liability (Alien Tort Statute). While the document is part of a collection likely reviewed by the House Oversight Committee (possibly related to an investigation involving Epstein or similar legal themes of jurisdiction/immunity), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023367.jpg
This document is page 7 of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief generated via Westlaw in 2019, likely related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee. While the user identifies this as Epstein-related, there are no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his immediate associates on this specific page; however, the inclusion of cases involving Deutsche Bank (implied by similar financial litigations) or UBS AG suggests this may be part of a larger file regarding financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023365.jpg
This document is a page from a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities for a legal filing related to the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Torture Victim Protection Act, and negligence claims against defendants alleged to have materially supported al-Qaeda, specifically mentioning 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank) and 'Sovereign Defendants.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production, likely related to investigations into financial networks supporting terrorism.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity