Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Judge Nathan

Person
Mentions
619
Relationships
58
Events
248
Documents
307
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
58 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAXWELL
Defendant judge
5
1
View
person Ms. Comey
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Anonymous Author
Witness judge
5
1
View
person Pete Brush
Professional
5
1
View
person Juror 50
Judicial oversight
5
1
View
person Juror No. 50
Judicial oversight
5
1
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Legal representative
5
5
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
5
1
View
organization The government
Judicial oversight
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The jury
Professional
5
1
View
person JSP
Professional
5
1
View
person Unknown author
Juror judge inferred
5
1
View
person USANYS Staff
Legal representative
4
4
View
person Juror 50
Juror judge
3
3
View
location USANYS
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Laura Menninger
Legal representative
2
2
View
location USANYS
Judicial oversight
2
2
View
person GM
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Professional
1
1
View
person USANYS Office
Legal representative
1
1
View
person David Oscar Markus
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Federal Prosecutors (Implied)
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney (Sender)
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Andrew
Prosecutor to judge
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Judge Nathan's first decision denying pretrial motions, with a discussion of MV-3 starting on pag... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell intends to argue violation of Martindell before Judge Nathan. Criminal Court View
N/A N/A Sentencing Hearing (likely for Ghislaine Maxwell) Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Denial of temporary release Court View
N/A N/A Ms. Maxwell's forthcoming motion before Judge Nathan. Court View
N/A N/A Denial of motions to dismiss District Court View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan declined to modify protective order Court View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's second bail application. Court View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan refused to modify the protective order. District Court View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan directed the Government to confer with MDC legal counsel regarding surveillance just... District Court View
N/A N/A Closing arguments in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan's ruling on bail/release conditions. District Court View
N/A N/A Bail Hearings/Decisions District Court View
N/A Legal motion Maxwell presented a motion to Judge Nathan to modify a Protective Order in her criminal case. Court View
N/A Legal ruling Judge Nathan ruled that Maxwell's arguments to modify a protective order failed to establish good... Court View
N/A Legal ruling Judge Nathan entered a 'challenged Order' denying Maxwell's request to use criminal discovery mat... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Maxwell's appeal of Judge Nathan's Order in a criminal case. N/A View
N/A Legal hearing A hearing was conducted by Judge Nathan to inquire into errors made by Juror 50 on a jury questio... N/A View
N/A Legal motion A potential future suppression motion that Maxwell could make before Judge Nathan. N/A View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan denied motion to modify criminal protective order. District Court View
N/A Legal ruling Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request for temporary release after analyzing her arguments and pro... The District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding Maxwell's trial, where a jury's potential bias due to disclosure of civil case material is discus... N/A View
N/A Trial A criminal trial where powerful testimony was heard from victims. Courtroom View
N/A Legal ruling Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request for bail after considering multiple written submissions. N/A View
N/A Court ruling Judge Nathan issued a written order finding Maxwell poses a flight risk and that temporary releas... District Court View

DOJ-OGR-00014483.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. It discusses the burden of proof, the importance of lack of evidence, and argues that the jury should find the defendant not guilty. The summation claims that accusers initially focused on Jeffrey Epstein, later adding Ghislaine Maxwell to their stories, and that accusers sought legal counsel and engaged with the FBI, potentially motivated by financial gain.

Court document / summation
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014463.jpg

This document is a page from the prosecution's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe outlines the evidence for 'Count Five' (sex trafficking conspiracy spanning 2000-2004), detailing how Maxwell recruited Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and facilitated Carolyn's sexual abuse in Palm Beach and New York. The prosecutor emphasizes the legal standard for conspiracy, noting that the jury only needs to find that the agreement existed for 'one moment' and that an overt act was taken by either Maxwell or Epstein.

Court transcript (summation)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014462.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Moe in the case against Maxwell. The summation outlines three conspiracy counts, alleging that from 1994 to 2004, Maxwell conspired with Epstein to commit crimes against victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell groomed Carolyn and Annie as part of an agreement to provide Epstein with underage girls for abuse, which constitutes the conspiracy.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005273.jpg

This document is an email dated October 21, 2021, from reporter Pete Brush of Law360 to Judge Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of a coalition of reporters from various news outlets, Brush expresses support for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's arguments against secret jury selection and vetting in the upcoming trial of USA v. Maxwell. The email underscores the press corps' interest in maintaining transparency in the judicial process.

Email
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020365.jpg

This legal document, dated May 27, 2021, details the denial of a renewed bail request by Maxwell on December 8, 2020. Judge Nathan denied the application, concluding that Maxwell remains a significant flight risk due to her substantial international ties, multiple citizenships, financial resources, and a history of providing incomplete information to the court. The judge found that no combination of bail conditions could reasonably assure Maxwell's appearance at trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011715.jpg

This document is a transcript of an opening statement, likely from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim. The attorney argues that the four female accusers, who are using pseudonyms, are unreliable witnesses motivated by money ("a payday"). She claims their stories have changed over time, were only told after Epstein's death, and are based on flawed, contaminated memories, which will be discussed in expert testimony.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011582.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022. It features a victim impact statement from a woman, now a psychologist, who describes her silence for two decades due to shame and fear of professional ruin. She addresses Judge Nathan directly, urging her to consider the ongoing suffering of victims and the systemic effects of the crimes when sentencing Ghislaine Maxwell.

Court transcript / victim impact statement
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
19
As Recipient
30
Total
49

Denial of Bail Application

From: Judge Nathan
To: Parties in the case

Judge Nathan issued a detailed written opinion (Ex. H) denying Maxwell's application for bail.

Written opinion
N/A
Communication Source

Nighttime security checks

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Judge Nathan

Complaint that nighttime security checks interfere with ability to prepare for trial; request to modify procedures.

Complaint/motion
N/A
Communication Source

Justification of procedures

From: Judge Nathan
To: MDC

Solicited a response regarding surveillance procedures.

Legal solicitation
N/A
Communication Source

Denial of Bail

From: Judge Nathan
To: GHISLAINE MAXWELL

Denial of application (Ex. H)

Written opinion
N/A
Communication Source

Bail/Detention arguments

From: Legal Counsel
To: Judge Nathan

Multiple rounds of briefing and lengthy argument regarding Maxwell's bail status.

Legal briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Denial of request

From: Judge Nathan
To: Ms. Maxwell

Judge Nathan denied Ms. Maxwell's request to share information with Judge Preska.

Legal ruling
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Question

From: Jury
To: Judge Nathan

A note asking a question about flights or evidence, described as 'decidedly ambiguous' by the judge.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Denial of bail application

From: Judge Nathan
To: Parties in the case

Judge Nathan issued a detailed written opinion denying Maxwell's bail application.

Written opinion
N/A
Communication Source

Request for permission to share information

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Judge Nathan

Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Nathan for permission to share information under seal with Judge Preska.

Legal request
N/A
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statement

From: Ms. Farmer
To: Judge Nathan

Describing the long-lasting effects of abuse by Maxwell and Epstein, specifically the loss of trust in herself.

Statement
N/A
Communication Source

Follow-up questions

From: Judge Nathan
To: prospective jurors

Questions posed to jurors who answered affirmatively to questions 25, 48, or 49.

Oral voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questioning

From: Judge Nathan
To: Juror 50

Questioning during jury selection process.

Voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Denial of Bail Request

From: Judge Nathan
To: Parties in the case

Judge Nathan issued a written opinion (Ex. L) denying Maxwell's request for bail.

Written opinion
N/A
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statement

From: Ms. Farmer
To: Judge Nathan

Describing the psychological impact of abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.

Court statement
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell

From: Sigrid S. McCawley (su...
To: Judge Nathan

Victim impact statement urging the judge to consider the lack of remorse, the trauma of the trial, and the ongoing suffering of victims when determining the sentence.

Letter
2022-06-24
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statement regarding Ghislaine Maxwell sente...

From: Sigrid S. McCawley (su...
To: Judge Nathan

Statement describing the trauma of the trial, Maxwell's lack of remorse, and a request for an appropriate prison sentence.

Letter
2022-06-24
Communication Source

United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Sigrid S. McCawley
To: Judge Nathan

A letter from Virginia Giuffre's counsel submitting Giuffre's victim impact statement for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The letter requests that the statement be read into the record because Giuffre is unable to attend in person due to a medical issue.

Letter
2022-06-22
Communication Source

Jury Selection Voir Dire

From: Judge Nathan
To: Juror No. 50

Judge Nathan welcomes Juror No. 50, explains the presumption of innocence for Ms. Maxwell, and issues instructions regarding avoiding media coverage.

Meeting
2022-02-24
Communication Source

Grounds for a new trial

From: Defense counsel
To: Judge Nathan

Defense Counsel sent a letter (ECF #569) to Judge Nathan claiming 'incontrovertible grounds for a new trial' based on Juror 50's interviews and information filed under seal.

Letter
2022-01-05
Communication Source

Court Order

From: Judge Nathan
To: Juror 50

Order directing an inquiry into Juror 50.

Order
2022-01-05
Communication Source

Appropriateness of an inquiry

From: Judge Nathan
To: Juror 50 / Parties

Invited Juror 50 to address the inquiry into his conduct and the effect of his personal history on deliberations.

Order
2022-01-05
Communication Source

Appropriateness of an inquiry into Juror 50

From: Judge Nathan
To: Counsel/Parties

Order addressing the appropriateness of an inquiry into Juror 50's conduct and truthfulness.

Order
2022-01-05
Communication Source

Opportunity to be heard

From: Judge Nathan
To: Juror 50

Judge Nathan issued an order giving Juror 50 the opportunity to submit a brief by January 26, 2022, if he wishes to be heard on the issue of an inquiry.

Court order
2022-01-05
Communication Source

Question regarding Count Four in the US v. Maxwell case

From: Unknown (signature red...
To: Judge Nathan

The author of the note asks Judge Nathan for clarification on Count Four, specifically whether the defendant can be found guilty if they aided in transporting 'Jane' when the intent for sexual activity was on Jane's part.

Note
2021-12-27
Communication Source

Response of David Oscar Markus in United States v. Maxwel...

From: David Oscar Markus
To: Judge Nathan

Markus submitting a responsive letter to the court via email because he lacks filing privileges in SDNY. He requests it be filed on the public docket.

Email
2021-07-30
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search