| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Various Clients
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Merchant, William
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Owen, Dennis
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pape, Mark
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peterson, Ronald A.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pollitt, Hunter
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Poncher, Lyle
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Postorivo, Jr., Eugenio
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Purcel, Morris
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ragsdale, C&E
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ragsdale, HV
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ragsdale, T&L
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ragsdale, TS IV
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Schmidt, Ralph F.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Schuett, J., William G.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Schuett Sr., William G.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Small, Richard & Arlene
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Spector, Donald
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stuart, Thomas
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tate, Joseph P.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Vanek, Greg
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Walsh, Carol
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wiggins, Glenn
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Yang, Julie
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Various Individuals
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
This document is page 'xii' of a legal index or table of contents, filed on February 24, 2022. It lists documents ranging from 2012 to 2013 concerning the case of United States v. David Parse, specifically referencing sentencing memoranda, restitution calculations regarding 'Jenkens and Gilchrist Clients,' and correspondence between attorney Paul Shechtman and Judge Pauley. The document outlines the procedural history of Parse's sentencing, appeal, and judgment.
This document, filed on March 15, 2013, as part of legal case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP, is a detailed restitution calculation for clients of the law firm Jenkens and Gilchrist. The table outlines tax benefits, deficiencies, and accrued interest for numerous individuals, primarily for the tax year 1999, culminating in a total restitution amount for each client. Footnotes specify different end dates in March 2012 for the interest calculations on the Revenue Agent's Report (RAR) for specific clients.
This legal document, filed on March 15, 2013, is a restitution calculation table for clients of the law firm Jenkens and Gilchrist. It details the total amount owed by each client based on tax benefits taken, tax deficiencies, and accrued interest for transactions primarily occurring in 1998 and 1999. The transactions are categorized as either 'SOS' or 'Short Sale'.
This document is a table of contents (Page xii) from a court filing filed on August 11, 2022. It lists historical legal documents from 2012 and 2013 related to the case of United States v. David Parse, including affidavits, sentencing memoranda, restitution calculations for Jenkens and Gilchrist clients, and correspondence between attorney Paul Shechtman and Judge Pauley. The document appears to be part of a larger appendix or record on appeal released via FOIA (DOJ-OGR).
This document is a financial table filed on March 15, 2013, as part of a legal case (1:09-cr-00581-WHP). It details the 'Tax Benefit Restitution Calculation' for numerous clients of the law firm Jenkens and Gilchrist, primarily for transactions in 1999. The table breaks down the tax deficiency, interest accrued through 2012 and 2013, and the total restitution amount owed by each client, summing to a total of $231,660,534 for all clients listed.
This document is a financial spreadsheet titled 'Jenkens and Gilchrist Clients Restitution Calculation,' filed as an exhibit in court cases 1:20-cv-00330-PAE and 1:09-cr-00581-WHP. It lists numerous clients (individuals and couples) along with calculated tax deficiencies, interest, and total restitution amounts owed, primarily stemming from tax years 1998 and 1999. The document details significant financial figures, with some individuals like Arthur Frigo and John R. Georgius listed with total restitution amounts in the tens of millions of dollars.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity