| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Jury selection discussion | A discussion occurred regarding potential juror Catherine Conrad. It was discovered via a Google ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection (voir dire) | A discussion took place regarding whether to keep or strike potential juror Catherine Conrad afte... | N/A | View |
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on why her firm did not raise an issue of juror misconduct concerning a Ms. Conrad, despite receiving a letter from her on June 20, 2011, which was approximately three weeks after the case verdict on May 24, 2011. Brune states that she did not believe juror misconduct had occurred and explains her general criteria for selecting jurors, emphasizing the importance of following the judge's instructions.
This document is a deposition transcript page where a witness named Brune recounts discussions about a potential juror, Catherine Conrad, during voir dire. A colleague named Theresa discovered a suspended lawyer with the same name, and a jury consultant advised striking Conrad from the jury, arguing that as a recovering alcoholic, she would likely focus more on personal responsibility than the government's burden of proof.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity