024.pdf
340 KB
Extraction Summary
11
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
340 KB
Summary
This document is a legal letter filed on October 16, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and serves to alert the court to a recent decision in a related Epstein case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke) where Judge Castel allowed a plaintiff to proceed anonymously, supporting Edwards' client's similar motion.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Attorney |
Author of the letter, representing Plaintiff Jane Doe; Partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter, presiding over case 1:19-cv-07625
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Client represented by Bradley J. Edwards in VE v. Nine East 71st Street
|
| Judge Castel | Judge |
Judge who issued a decision in a related Epstein case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke)
|
| Katlyn Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in related case 19-cv-7771
|
| Epstein | Deceased/Subject |
Referenced in 'related Epstein case'
|
| Indyke | Defendant |
Defendant in related case 19-cv-7771
|
| Seth M. Lehrman | Attorney |
Listed on letterhead
|
| Brittany N. Henderson | Attorney |
Listed on letterhead
|
| Matthew D. Weissing | Attorney |
Listed on letterhead
|
| J. Stanley Pottinger | Attorney |
Listed on letterhead for New York Office
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edwards Pottinger LLC |
Law firm representing the Plaintiff
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is filed (implied by address and S.D.N.Y. citation)
|
|
| Nine East 71st Street |
Defendant in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-09-12
Decision issued by Judge Castel in Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et al. granting motion to proceed anonymously
S.D.N.Y.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Judge Nathan
|
|
|
Office location of Edwards Pottinger LLC
|
Relationships (3)
We represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in the above-captioned action.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.
Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et al.
Key Quotes (2)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,273 characters)
Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF Document 24 Filed 10/16/19 Page 1 of 1
EP EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC
EP EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC
Florida Office
Bradley J. Edwards *◊ⱡ
Seth M. Lehrman *†
Brittany N. Henderson *◊
Matthew D. Weissing *ⱡ
Bradley J. Edwards *◊ⱡ
Seth M. Lehrman *†
Brittany N. Henderson *◊
Matthew D. Weissing *ⱡ
425 North Andrews Avenue
Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone (954)524-2820
Fax (954)524-2822
Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone (954)524-2820
Fax (954)524-2822
New York Office
J. Stanley Pottinger ‡
J. Stanley Pottinger ‡
† Admitted in California
◊ Admitted in District of Columbia
* Admitted in Florida
‡ Admitted in New York
ⱡ Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer
◊ Admitted in District of Columbia
* Admitted in Florida
‡ Admitted in New York
ⱡ Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer
October 16, 2019
VIA ECF
Hon. Alison J. Nathan
Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
We represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. In connection with our Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym (ECF 4), we write to bring to the Court's attention a decision issued by Judge Castel in a related Epstein case granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Anonymously. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A. See Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-7771 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2019).
Respectfully Submitted,
[Signature]
Bradley J. Edwards
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
954.524.2820 office 954.524.2822 fax
954.524.2820 office 954.524.2822 fax
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document