ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Court (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
|
Presiding judge |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
EFTA00027158.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney to Judge Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email updates the court on victim attendance for an upcoming arraignment, noting that Victim-2 will attend via phone while her attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley will attend in person, whereas Victims 1, 3, and 4 will not attend.
EFTA00027089.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 19, 2021. Following a previous decision to sever perjury counts from the trial, the Judge orders the Government to declare by April 20, 2021, whether it intends to use specific documents currently subject to suppression motions in the upcoming non-perjury trial. If the Government does not plan to use them, the Court will defer ruling on the suppression motions until the perjury trial is scheduled.
EFTA00026750.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues for the entry of its proposed protective order regarding discovery materials, specifically opposing the defendant's request to publicly name victims who have previously spoken to the media and opposing restrictions on the Government's use of its own investigative materials. The document includes the full text of the proposed protective order, detailing how 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information (including sexualized imagery) must be handled by the defense.
EFTA00026705.pdf
Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order that would have allowed her to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases. The Judge ruled that Maxwell failed to show good cause or relevance for the disclosure. However, the Court permitted Maxwell to disclose specific facts to the relevant civil courts regarding the history of grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' and previous rulings by other courts ('Court-1' and 'Court-2') regarding those materials.
EFTA00026484.pdf
Court Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 22, 2021, outlining the procedures for jury selection in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes dates for screening questionnaires (Nov 4, 5, 12) and voir dire (Nov 16-19), mandates the use of juror numbers for anonymity, and denies a request to seal proposed questionnaires. The Judge cites significant case publicity and COVID-19 protocols as factors in these procedural decisions.
EFTA00025219.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter details her extensive access to discovery review (13 hours/day), attorney communications (25 hours VTC/week), and specific search protocols including strip searches and body scans. It also notes she was weighed on June 3, 2021, at 138 pounds, and receives wellness checks every 15 minutes at night.
EFTA00025066.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 11, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It formally notifies the defense that the government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals as co-conspirators during the trial, specifically for the purpose of admitting evidence under the co-conspirator hearsay exception. The letter is marked as Exhibit 1 and designated as confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00025059.pdf
An email from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers, dated October 26, 2021. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine, sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
EFTA00024724.pdf
This document is a letter motion from the U.S. Department of Justice to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman requesting a stay of the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke' pending the outcome of the criminal prosecution regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that proceeding with civil discovery would prejudice the criminal trial by exposing witnesses, risking harassment, and allowing Maxwell to circumvent criminal discovery limitations. The letter references the June 2020 indictment of Maxwell for her role in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse scheme.
EFTA00024708.pdf
This document contains a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Maxwell, dated May 14, 2021, and an associated email chain circulating the order. The order denies Maxwell's request to alter detention protocols regarding flashlight checks every 15 minutes, ruling that the checks are necessary for safety in a high-profile case and do not violate her rights. The email chain shows the order being forwarded by a Staff Attorney at MDC Brooklyn.
EFTA00024706.pdf
This document contains an email thread and the text of a Court Order dated May 14, 2021, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Maxwell's request to stop flashlight checks performed by guards every 15 minutes, accepting the Government's explanation that these are necessary security protocols for a high-profile inmate housed alone. However, the Judge urged the MDC to consider whether sleep disruptions could be reduced and to ensure protocols remain neutral and necessary.
EFTA00024556.pdf
This document is a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 2, 2020, announcing the arrest and charging of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details allegations that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to entice, transport, and sexually abuse minors, playing a critical role in grooming victims. The document also notes she is charged with perjury regarding false statements made in 2016 depositions.
EFTA00024233.pdf
This document is a Court Order filed on October 28, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It establishes logistics and protocols for an in-person pretrial conference scheduled for November 1, 2021, including the designation of Courtroom 518 for the proceedings and several overflow rooms for the public. The order details strict COVID-19 entry requirements (masks, temperature checks, questionnaires) and prohibits the use of electronic devices in overflow rooms.
EFTA00024230.pdf
Court Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order outlines procedures for jury selection, stating that juror names will be provided on November 16 during voir dire and anticipating that peremptory strikes will occur on November 29, followed immediately by opening statements.
EFTA00024166.pdf
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 24, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a defense application to subpoena a law firm representing alleged victims for personal or confidential information. The court establishes a schedule for the law firm to formally file its objections (treated as a motion to quash) by March 26, 2021, and outlines procedures for redactions and subsequent responses.
EFTA00024023.pdf
A formal letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists twelve reply memoranda the defense intends to file in support of various motions, including motions to dismiss the indictment and suppress evidence. It also outlines the procedural handling of these documents, specifically regarding redactions of confidential information and filing under seal.
EFTA00023503.pdf
This document contains an email chain from September 14-17, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The correspondence is between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan. The emails discuss the submission and filing of letters and memo endorsements 'ex parte and under seal' pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1).
EFTA00023460.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 29, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It is addressed to counsel, including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, distributing an attached Order issued by the Judge and noting it will be filed publicly the following Monday.
EFTA00023385.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 18, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that courtroom sketch artists are prohibited from drawing exact likenesses of 'Protected Witnesses' (those testifying under pseudonyms or first names) to protect their identities. The word 'PROPOSED' in the title is struck through, indicating the judge adopted this as a final order.
EFTA00023363.pdf
An email chain from November 20-21, 2021, between defense counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence concerns the filing of a redacted letter regarding the self-authentication of birth certificates for alleged minor victims. The Court instructs the defense to follow Docket No. 474 for filing instructions.
EFTA00023356.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 19, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It originates from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, distributing a sealed Memorandum Opinion & Order (Dkt. No. 477) to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The top email forwards this order with the comment 'Sealed opinion on MV-3.'
EFTA00023329.pdf
Defense counsel Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan opposing the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) regarding alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these materials are exculpatory under Brady because they relate to post-1997 allegations where witnesses do not implicate Maxwell, thereby supporting her defense against perjury charges that she was unaware of Epstein's abuse. The letter also argues the government has failed to show 'good cause' under Rule 16 to delay this discovery.
EFTA00023211.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. The order sets deadlines for responses and replies regarding motions in limine filed on October 18, requiring parties to file omnibus (single document) responses. It also establishes a protocol and deadline (October 29, 2021) for filing redacted briefs and a joint letter justifying those redactions.
EFTA00023108.pdf
This document is an email from the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 28, 2020, addressed to counsel involved in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to distribute an Opinion & Order regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, noting that the document is temporarily sealed to allow parties to propose redactions by December 30, 2020.
EFTA00022514.pdf
This document is a letter motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, on April 30, 2021, requesting Judge Alison Nathan to order the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to accept two hard drives containing discovery materials for Maxwell's review. The defense argues the current format of 2.2 million pages is difficult to navigate, and they have reorganized the files to be more user-friendly. Judge Nathan granted the order on May 3, 2021, with a stipulation allowing MDC counsel to submit objections by May 4, 2021.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity