| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Adversarial negotiating |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional opposing counsel |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafana
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor defense counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Meeting participants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Oosterbaan
|
Opposing counsel negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion and agreement on the addendum's terms after a draft was sent and a phone call occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations regarding Mr. Epstein's plea agreement, lasting seven weeks, described as 'spinning ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña sent a revised plea agreement to Lefkowitz and advised him about the controlling NPA if... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sought to speak to Acosta regarding negotiations. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña sent revised Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to Lefkowitz. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz argued that the government was not required to notify victims under the § 2255 provisio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The defense team rejected Acosta's December 19, 2007, NPA modification letter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz responded to Acosta's NPA proposal, raising 'troubling questions' and noting the incong... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA Negotiation | West Palm Beach/Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a follow-up letter to Acosta, expressing USAO's concern about Epstein intentionall... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentence Reduction | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a revised draft NPA | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting process of the NPA and federal plea agreement | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal dispute | Dispute between the prosecution (Sloman) and defense (Starr, Lefkowitz) over the notification of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Negotiations over a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein, involving arguments, proposals, ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator worked at Kirkland & Ellis. | Kirkland & Ellis | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) negotiations between Villafaña and Lefkowitz regarding Jeffrey Ep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz to discuss the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Plea agreement negotiation | Discussions and communications regarding the terms of a plea agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, invol... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz where Lefkowitz claimed Acosta made several conc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea deal negotiation regarding sentence length (18-month vs 20-month) and jurisdiction (state vs... | USAO | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Lefkowitz sent Villafaña a revised draft Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) proposing an 18-month se... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-16 | Legal drafting | Lefkowitz added a confidentiality clause to a new version of the NPA for the first time. | N/A | View |
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 208-209), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight report. It details the aggressive legal strategy employed by Jeffrey Epstein's 'army' of high-profile attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr) against the prosecution, including investigating prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. The text confirms that despite these efforts, Epstein pled guilty on June 30, 2008, to state charges requiring 18 months imprisonment and sex offender registration.
This document page outlines the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in 2005 regarding the abuse of minors. It specifically details allegations of witness tampering, citing a 2007 incident where Epstein instructed his personal assistant, Leslie Groff, not to cooperate with FBI agents serving a subpoena at her home. The document also briefly mentions Donald Trump and Bill Clinton in the context of phone listings in an evidentiary journal.
An email dated November 29, 2018, sent by 'David' to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' sharing an AOL article about a Trump aide helping a sex abuser secure a plea deal. David comments on the media angle, discusses the recipient's legal representation (specifically mentioning Dershowitz and Lefkowitz), and disputes the article's claim that victims were silenced. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email dated November 29, 2018, sent by 'David' to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' sharing an AOL article about a Trump aide helping a sex abuser secure a plea deal. David comments on the media angle, discusses the recipient's legal representation (specifically mentioning Dershowitz and Lefkowitz), and disputes the article's claim that victims were silenced. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document page, likely from a House Oversight Committee report, features a photograph of a woman (presumably Villafaña) and a text excerpt describing her frustration during legal negotiations. It quotes a communication from Villafaña to Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz, dated December 13, 2007, in which she claims to have 'bent over backwards' to accommodate the effects of an agreement on Mr. Epstein.
Discussion about the draft addendum, leading to agreement on its terms.
Transmittal email for revised NPA, stated "we have not and don't plan to ask immigration" proceedings to be initiated.
Acosta's reply about being happy to talk but wanting [M]arie on the call to avoid undermining staff during negotiations and allowing interlocutory appeals.
Villafaña responded to Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically addressing 'false' allegations that the government had made.
Lefkowitz sent a second letter to Acosta, asserting the § 2255 provision was 'inherently flawed and becoming truly unmanageable'.
Lefkowitz sent a follow-up letter to Acosta asserting that Epstein was intentionally delaying plea entry and that defense counsel was making efforts to resolve issues.
Villafaña's email continued to include language referring to the four named assistants and unnamed employees.
Sloman emailed Lefkowitz a revision to the Addendum language.
Lefkowitz emailed Villafaña about a draft NPA with a 20-month jail sentence and 10 months of community control, questioning USAO flexibility on the § 2255 procedure, contrasting it with 18 months jail and 12 months community control.
Asking that USAO try to keep the NPA from becoming public.
Sent a revision to the Addendum language.
Request to postpone plea from Oct 26 to Nov 20 due to scheduling conflict.
Refusing private 'interlocutory' appeals without staff present.
Sent revised NPA; stated they don't plan to ask for immigration proceedings.
Conveyed two options Lourie suggested: original proposal with 18-month sentence or state charges plus two federal obstruction charges.
Reference to a 4:30 call.
Lefkowitz attempted to reach Acosta, who then directed Villafaña to return the call.
Forwarded a revised draft victim notification letter for comment, detailing the completion of the federal investigation and the terms of Epstein's state plea deal.
Villafaña’s publicly released emails to Lefkowitz, which drew criticism.
Villafaña sent a lengthy email to Lefkowitz conveying two plea options suggested by Lourie, involving state and federal charges with different sentence lengths, and also mentioned her willingness to seek approval from Acosta for another federal plea option.
Villafaña offered to have a face-to-face meeting 'off campus' at a 'neutral' location to finalize the NPA negotiations.
Lefkowitz questioned Acosta about the rejection of their proposed plea deal for Epstein, outlining the terms and asking why they were not satisfactory.
Following a call from Acosta, Sloman emailed a revision of the Addendum language to Lefkowitz.
Lefkowitz emailed Acosta seeking to postpone Epstein's guilty plea from October 26, 2007, to November 20, 2007, citing a scheduling conflict.
After getting input from Acosta, Sloman emailed Lefkowitz and agreed to the postponement of the guilty plea.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity