William Barr
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Congressional Representative
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Horowitz
|
Professional oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional government official to detainee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Geoffrey Berman
|
Professional conflict |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional critical |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ben Sasse
|
Oversight political |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ben Sasse
|
Hearing interaction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of testimony |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
unidentified speaker
|
Criticism |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Mueller
|
Professional oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ben Sasse
|
Correspondence |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Directive issuance | Following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, then-Attorney General William Barr issued directives to be applie... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | N/A | Attorney General William Barr Testimony | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-03-03 | N/A | Presentation by William Barr about marketing and other scams against seniors. | Unknown (Attended by signat... | View |
| 2019-08-10 | Investigation | The Washington Examiner reported that Attorney General Barr announced a DOJ inspector general inv... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Sasse letter to AG Barr re Epstein suicide | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Senator Sasse sends letter to AG Barr regarding Epstein's suicide | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-01-16 | N/A | William Barr Confirmation Hearing | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2019-01-15 | N/A | Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nominee William Barr about the Epstein case. | Senate Hearing (implied) | View |
| 2019-01-15 | N/A | Sen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case. | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001871.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, is being subjected to "draconian" and punitive pretrial detention conditions. The letter posits that these harsh measures are not related to Maxwell's own conduct but are a direct result of the government's attempt to repair its reputation following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody. The attorney details failed attempts to resolve these issues through internal prison channels and claims the conditions are impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her legal defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001867.jpg
This legal document, filed by the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues against the restrictive conditions of her confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The filing contends that these measures, including constant surveillance and repeated searches, are an overreaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's death, rather than being based on any specific risk posed by Maxwell. The document also raises concerns about Ms. Maxwell's exposure to COVID-19 and the erasure of her legal emails, quoting then-Attorney General William Barr's stated interest in ensuring she makes it to trial.
DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg
A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00022031.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 9, 2020, is a motion seeking to compel the government to produce discovery related to the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The motion argues that multiple federal agencies, including the DOJ, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service, have conducted investigations, and the defense is entitled to reports and documents from these inquiries. The document cites various news reports and a previous court order from November 2019 to support its claim that the government has failed to meet its disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00021459.jpg
This legal document analyzes the ambiguity of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) concerning when victims' rights attach, particularly before formal charges are filed. It notes that at the time of the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Epstein case, court precedent was sparse and divided, a situation that continued as of the writing of this report. Because the law was not clear, the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concluded that the prosecutors' failure to consult with victims before signing the NPA did not constitute professional misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010476.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on June 15, 2022, argues that the pre-sentence detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell at the MDC constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The filing claims her treatment is significantly harsher than that of the general prison population and was implemented under specific directives from then-Attorney General William Barr, who was intent on avoiding a repeat of the incident involving Epstein in BOP custody. The document asserts this disparate and punitive treatment was condoned by MDC supervisors and wardens.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.jpg
This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031407.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein via the address jeevacation@gmail.com). The emails contain significant redactions under privilege, but the visible content is a forwarded Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article details the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recusing itself from the Epstein case and the Department of Justice reassigning the victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.jpg
This document is an email chain dated March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and a recipient identified as 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com). The correspondence is marked 'Privileged' with significant redactions in the message bodies. The visible content consists of a pasted Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown reporting that the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case and reassigned it to Atlanta, following scrutiny involving Attorney General nominee William Barr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027670.jpg
This document is a log of digital messages exchanged on May 1, 2019, between the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves coordinating a connection between individuals named 'dan' and 'Darren', sharing contact information for 'Lesley', and sharing a New York Times opinion piece regarding William Barr's testimony. The final visible line asks a question about a preference for 'beard or no beard'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025467.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from May 2019 containing messages sent by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and one redacted sender. The content focuses on US political news, sharing links about Trump investigations, the trade war with China, and the Russia probe, alongside a specific request for 'the last filming' and a statement that Sidney Blumenthal would receive a subpoena. The document originates from the House Oversight Committee files.
Maxwell and Epstein cases
Attorney General William Barr told ABC News on a Wednesday that he was watching the Maxwell case closely, was "livid" about Epstein's death, and was proud of the work done on the case.
Crimes Against Humanity taking place against America’s se...
Open letter demanding federal intervention into Florida's guardianship system, alleging massive corruption and human trafficking.
Epstein's Death
Announcement of IG investigation and reaction to the death.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity