Don King
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mike Tyson
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 |
DOJ-OGR-00001764.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's characterization of Maxwell's actions as 'cherry-picking' and challenges the government's issuance of subpoenas as not being 'standard practice,' citing Second Circuit case law (Martindell) regarding protective orders and civil discovery. Large portions of the document are redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz (implied context) regarding his representation of Mike Tyson. The text recounts their first meeting in Indianapolis where Dershowitz called Tyson a 'schmuck' for putting himself in a compromising position, which led to Tyson hiring him. It details Tyson's honorable conduct as a client, his time in prison, and his eventual repayment of legal fees after his release, while criticizing Tyson's original trial counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017319.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal philosophy surrounding rape prosecutions, the trade-off between convicting the guilty and protecting the innocent, and the author's shift toward defending accused rapists. The text specifically details the author's involvement as the appellate lawyer for Mike Tyson following his conviction for raping Desiree Washington in Indianapolis.
Representation of Mike Tyson
Don King asked if the author would represent Tyson on his appeal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity