Department of Defense
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Google
|
Contractual |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
NSA
|
Organizational subordination |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Department of Defense investigation into compromised sources (tens of thousands of man-hours). | USA | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Passage of National Defense Authorization Act restricting funding. | Washington D.C. | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032076.jpg
This document is a compilation of three press clippings or web articles dated between October and November 2010, focusing on GTX Corp and its Chairman Patrick Bertagna. The articles discuss GTX Corp's GPS technology, specifically the 'GPS Smart Shoe' for dementia patients developed with Aetrex Worldwide, and the release of a social networking check-in app called 'iCheck-In' via its subsidiary LOCiMOBILE. The document bears a House Oversight bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015884.jpg
This document is page 194 from a text titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015884. The text explores philosophical concepts of knowledge, contrasting mathematician David Hilbert's belief that 'we must know' with Donald Rumsfeld's famous quote about 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' While part of a House Oversight production (potentially related to a larger investigation), this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015880.jpg
This document appears to be page 190 of a book, likely titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', which has been included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015880). The text discusses mathematical concepts, specifically random numbers, quantum noise, and infinities, and includes a famous quote by former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld regarding 'known knowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029733.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or article contained within House Oversight files. It details the confirmation hearings of Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense on January 31 (2013), specifically focusing on his shift in stance regarding Iran sanctions and military intervention. It includes commentary from WINEP official Dennis Ross, who expressed to the LA Times that 2013 would be a decisive year for Iranian diplomacy and potential force.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029649.tif
This document is an article from The New Republic by Fouad Ajami dated June 3, 2011, arguing against removing US troops from Iraq. It discusses Defense Secretary Robert Gates's observations on Iraq's emerging democracy and his past involvement with the Iraq Study Group, highlighting his shift in views on the Iraq war and his philosophical alignment with figures like Brzezinski and Scowcroft.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029506.jpg
This document, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp, outlines the geopolitical influence efforts of Middle Eastern allies (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Egypt) during the early Trump administration. It details how these nations, dissatisfied with Obama's policies and wary of Clinton, utilized financial resources and informal channels—specifically targeting Jared Kushner—to shape U.S. foreign policy. The text highlights the role of George Nader and contrasts the Obama administration's nuanced diplomacy with Trump's direct, less critical support of these allies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020310.jpg
This document page (158) details the history of NSA surveillance expansion following the 9/11 attacks, specifically focusing on the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. It discusses the conflict between government intelligence gathering and privacy advocates (hacktivists), the technical measures taken to bypass encryption/TOR, and the subsequent bureaucratic compliance framework established involving the DOJ and DOD. While part of a larger House Oversight cache, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020307.jpg
This document appears to be a historical overview of United States signals intelligence, tracing its origins from the 'Black Chamber' and Western Union cooperation in the 1920s through World War II codebreaking (Enigma and Purple ciphers) to the formation of the NSA in 1952. It details the NSA's mandate to protect US communications and intercept foreign signals, noting its expansion during the Cold War with a 'black budget' and advanced technology. While part of a larger House Oversight production (likely related to intelligence abuses or history), this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020298.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or narrative regarding the aftermath of the Edward Snowden intelligence leaks. It discusses the skepticism of U.S. intelligence officials regarding Snowden's claims of protecting secrets, the assumption that Russia and China accessed the data ('keys to the kingdom'), and the role of Admiral Michael Rogers in rebuilding the NSA after replacing General Alexander. Note: Despite the prompt labeling this as 'Epstein-related,' the text on this specific page deals exclusively with National Security and the Snowden affair.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020289.jpg
This document page (137) from a House Oversight file details the aftermath of Edward Snowden's flight to Russia, specifically focusing on whether he retained sensitive NSA documents. Through interviews with his lawyer Anatoly Kucherena (conducted by Sophie Shevardnadze in 2013 and the author in 2015), it is confirmed that Snowden did not give all documents to journalists in Hong Kong but retained a second, more sensitive set of files while in Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020287.jpg
This document is a page from a report or narrative (marked House Oversight) detailing the NSA's damage assessment regarding Edward Snowden. It analyzes the volume of data stolen (estimated at 1.7 million touched / 1.3 million copied) during his time at Booz Allen and Dell, while noting disputes from Snowden and journalists Greenwald and Bamford regarding these numbers. The text discusses the potential motivations of the NSA Damage Assessment team under Ledgett and the legal implications of the leaks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020278.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative book or report (marked as a House Oversight exhibit) detailing Cold War espionage tradecraft. It specifically discusses the case of Robert Hanssen, a 'walk-in' spy who provided the KGB with massive amounts of US intelligence while refusing direct control or face-to-face meetings, and contrasts this with the defection of KGB Major Anatoli Golitsyn in 1962. The text analyzes the intelligence value of 'defectors-in-place' versus those who physically defect to the United States.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028408.jpg
This document is a news article dated September 24, 2018, reporting on Google CEO Sundar Pichai's plan to meet with top GOP lawmakers, including House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy. The meeting was organized to address concerns regarding Google's alleged bias against conservatives, user privacy violations, and business dealings with China. Contrary to the user's query, this document contains no information, names, or events related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391.jpg
This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012391,' lists historical precedents of U.S. Presidents from 1876 to 1990 using signing statements to challenge the constitutionality of 'legislative veto' provisions in various acts. Presidents including Kennedy, Nixon, Reagan, and Grant are cited as having declared they would not be bound by such provisions, treating them as non-binding requests or nullities. The document appears to be legal or historical research compiled for a government body, but its content does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity