The State
OrganizationRelationship Network
032.pdf
A legal motion filed on March 13, 2017, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS). Attorney Paul G. Cassell requests admission Pro Hac Vice to represent Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards in his lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his good standing with the Utah Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
032-01.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on March 13, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Paul G. Cassell submits this declaration to support his application for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, in his case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his clean legal record, stating he has no felony convictions or disciplinary actions against him and is a member in good standing of the Utah bar.
005-01.pdf
This document is a formal certification filed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It pertains to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in relation to the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca certifies his compliance with local rules and his good standing with the Colorado bar.
EFTA00013754.pdf
This document contains a November 2007 email thread involving the US Attorney's Office (Alex Acosta cc'd) discussing the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. Key topics include the strategic scheduling of the plea/sentencing on December 16th to 'reduce media frenzy,' the legal nuances of his 'sexual predator' designation, and the loophole allowing the Sheriff's Office (rather than State Corrections) to grant him work release. The emails also detail coordination with Epstein's lawyers (Lefkowitz and Goldberger) regarding victim notification and potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00001554.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to appear and practice pro hac vice as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists Pagliuca's contact information and confirms his good standing with the Colorado bar.
DOJ-OGR-00030392.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a motion for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion requests that the court order the witness's deposition for an unspecified criminal case and the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein' to be conducted simultaneously. The stated purpose is to prevent potential harassment of the witness by the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00021381.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report critiques the plea negotiations between the USAO (led by Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense. It highlights that the 18-month sentence was a reduction from an initial 'non-negotiable' 2-year offer, a decision for which OPR could find no documented justification or legal basis. The report concludes that Acosta viewed the federal case merely as a 'backstop' to state charges, failing to seek a punishment that matched the severity of Epstein's crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00021242.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that quotes a lengthy email from an individual named Menchel to a recipient identified in a footnote as Sloman. In the email, Menchel severely criticizes Sloman for acting without authorization in the investigation of Mr. Epstein, specifically for preparing an indictment memo and misleading agents. Menchel also clarifies that his own conversation with Lilly Sanchez about the case was an informal exploratory discussion, not a formal plea offer, and was conducted with the full knowledge of the US Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00031667.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2) of a faxed letter dated January 6, 2008, sent by attorney Aileen Josephs. It is copied to La Tosha Lowe, Rolando Garcia, and United States Attorney Alexander Acosta (spelled 'Alexader' in the text). The letter references an enclosure regarding a FOIA request filed in August 2006 and a response from the State.
DOJ-OGR-00031565.jpg
This legal document, dated March 31, 2008, is a request for a protective order filed by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein on behalf of 'Witness Y. Doe'. The motion asks the court to require that depositions for a criminal case and a civil case, 'Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein', be conducted at the same time to prevent harassment of the witness by Defendant Epstein. The filing states that counsel for the State and for Epstein were contacted about this request but have not responded.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031731.jpg
An email dated April 16, 2014, from Dan Christensen to Tonja Haddad Coleman. Christensen asks Coleman to address a contention by the state that an individual named Kogan signed a resisting arrest charge against an individual named Hart, noting he will not include it in his current story. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020544.jpg
This document outlines the connections between Chinese-language media outlets in the United States—specifically SinoVision, Qiaobao, and the Sino American Times—and the Chinese government's Overseas Chinese Affairs Office. It details how these organizations were established to promote Beijing's "soft power," with executives often appointed from Chinese state agencies and content sourced directly from official state media.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027506.jpg
This document is a forensic log of digital messages from November 23, 2018, involving the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted correspondent. The conversation focuses on a strategic pivot from using an NGO structure (described as 'old thinking' and 'public') to a 'press/news base' or media platform, which is described as 'private', 'protected', and 'privileged'. Notable content includes a reference to keeping 'notebooks, safe' and framing the strategy as a 'battle plan' to 'build a fort to protect your gains'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity