CALIFORNIA
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Stogner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loni Hancock
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark DeSaulnier
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Implementation of California's new recreational cannabis law | California | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Court decision | The Supreme Court decided the case of Stogner v. California. | N/A | View |
EFTA00016896.pdf
This document is an email chain from late 2019 concerning an SDNY investigation, involving Robert Glassman and Nathan Werksman. The correspondence focuses on scheduling meetings, discussing logistical details like a client's mother's overseas location, and outlining topics for discussion related to potential contact with Epstein and/or Maxwell. The emails show an ongoing effort to coordinate in-person meetings in California and establish communication methods for the investigation.
EFTA00016425.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and FBI technical agents regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including the large volume of data (terabytes), issues with encryption, network infrastructure problems at the lab, and difficulties ensuring 'load files' are compatible with the Relativity e-discovery platform for 'taint review'. The emails also list specific evidence identifiers (NYC numbers) for hard drives, laptops, and loose media found at the NY mansion. NOTE: While the phrase 'flight records' appears on page 8, it is used as a hypothetical example of a technical error (attachments not linking to emails) and does not contain actual flight data.
EFTA00016268.pdf
This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.
EFTA00014454.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated May 2, 2019. The article details Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's testimony before a House Committee, where he defended his previous actions as a U.S. Attorney regarding the lenient non-prosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein. The article notes that Judge Kenneth Marra recently ruled that Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act, though Acosta claimed he followed DOJ protocol. The report also covers Acosta's comments on labor regulations, including overtime rules and the minimum wage.
EFTA00013959.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2008, between attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). They are attempting to schedule a phone call to discuss the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement' related to Jeffrey Epstein. Roy Black notes he is traveling in California/the mountains with poor cell reception.
EFTA00013448.pdf
This document is an email chain from February to May 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a forensic/technical team regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including the inability to link emails to attachments (using 'flight records' as an example), mismatched load files, and a 'disaster' in tracking over 1 million documents. The technical team notes delays due to COVID-19 work reductions and a major network replacement that required the deletion of 400 TB of old data.
EFTA00013253.pdf
This document is an email chain from August to October 2020 between attorneys Gloria Allred and Mariann Wang and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The attorneys are coordinating interviews for several new victims (referred to by initials AR, DM, JRC, and EH) willing to speak to the FBI regarding incidents involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ranging from 2000 to 2017. Notably, one client (AR) alleges an interaction with Prince Andrew at Epstein's townhouse in approximately 2010.
EFTA00010440.pdf
This document consists of an email chain from February to April 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and forensic technical support regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including the inability to link emails to attachments (specifically mentioning 'flight records' as an example of a missing link), mismatched control numbers, and network infrastructure changes requiring the deletion of 400TB of data. The emails inventory seized items, noting 9 hard drives from a 2007 search found in the NY apartment, over 40 devices and 60 CDs from the NY mansion, and over 25 devices/servers from the Virgin Islands.
EFTA00010334.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC. The correspondence, dating between September 2019 and January 2020, concerns the transfer of evidence—specifically emails and 'photo booth' style photographs—related to a witness who had encounters with Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor mentions needing the photos to attach to an FBI '302' interview report.
EFTA00009941.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the FBI's NY CART team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the technical challenges of processing digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence details friction over data compatibility between forensic tools and the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform, with the FBI explaining delays due to encryption and the sheer volume of terabytes of data from servers, computers, and loose media found in Epstein's New York and Virgin Islands properties. A significant detail reveals that 9 hard drives found in his NY apartment were actually copies of drives from a previous July 2007 search.
EFTA00009802.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and digital forensic teams regarding the chaotic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands in 2019-2020. The prosecutors express severe frustration with the FBI and technical teams over disorganized data dumps, including over 1 million documents with broken links between emails and attachments, and the inability to correlate files with specific seized devices. The text also reveals that some evidence found in the NY apartment included copies of drives from a previous July 2007 search.
EFTA00003030.pdf
This document is a photograph of the rear panel of an Apple iMac computer (Model A1311), likely seized as physical evidence. It displays the device's regulatory markings, power specifications, and unique identifiers, specifically Serial Number W804736DDAS and EMC No. 2389. The image includes an evidence tracking number 'EFTA00003030' in the bottom right corner.
EFTA00002905.pdf
A close-up photograph of the back panel of an Apple iMac computer, serving as physical evidence (marked EFTA00002905). The image captures the regulatory markings, model number (A1419), EMC number (2806), and the specific serial number (C02NM1M0FY14) identifying the device.
EFTA00002682.pdf
This document is a hand-drawn architectural elevation sketch on a roll of tracing paper. It depicts the 'East' elevation of a structure labeled 'Tyler Spa', showing a long building with arches and a terrace. The paper roll label identifies it as sketch paper manufactured in Monterey Park, California.
Contact Book (Redacted)
This document appears to be a heavily redacted address book or contact list associated with Jeffrey Epstein. It spans from 2004-2005 and contains an alphabetical listing of names, organizations, and businesses, along with sections for specific locations like "France", "Israel", "Kenya", and categories like "Massage", "Medical", and "Travel". The document includes handwritten notes identifying key individuals, witnesses, and staff members, such as Ghislaine Maxwell, chefs, pilots, and drivers.
DOJ-OGR-00000207.tif
This document appears to be page 7 of a legal brief or DOJ Office of General Research (OGR) report discussing the enforceability of plea agreements. It argues that the United States government must honor the plain language of written plea deals, even if it prevents a meritorious prosecution, to maintain trust in the justice system. It uses a hypothetical scenario (likely analogous to the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement) where a defendant pleads guilty to protect co-conspirators from being charged in other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00000132.tif
This document discusses the legislative history and intent behind the PROTECT Act's retroactivity provisions, emphasizing that Congress removed an express retroactivity clause due to constitutional concerns. It cites a Supreme Court case (Stogner v. California) and Senator Leahy's statements to argue that the Act applies to past conduct, like Maxwell's, where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, without violating the Ex Post Facto Clause.
DOJ-OGR-00015175.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal General Release agreement, likely related to a settlement or compensation claim. It details the 'Releasor's' waiver of rights, authorization for information disclosure to 'Epiq' for resolving liens (Medicare/Medicaid), and the 'Epstein Estate's' responsibility to pay negotiated amounts for resolved claims. The Releasor is granting this release voluntarily in exchange for a Compensation Offer and has received legal advice.
DOJ-OGR-00015174.tif
This document is a General Release related to claims against Mr. Epstein, the Epstein Entities, and the Epstein Estate (collectively, 'Releasees'). It broadly releases all claims, including those related to acts of sexual abuse by Mr. Epstein, regardless of their geographic origin. The document also notes that the Releasor is familiar with California Civil Code Section 1542 regarding unknown claims.
DOJ-OGR-00033225.tif
This document excerpt describes aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's character and relationships through the recollections of a friend, Eisenstein, and details about his long-term intimate relationship with Eva Andersson. It highlights his playful nature in high school, his enduring friendship with Eisenstein, and his financial support and involvement in Eva Andersson's medical education.
DOJ-OGR-00000557.jpg
This document is page 47 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg is arguing against the government's claim that payments of $250,000 and $100,000 made by the defendant constituted witness tampering or obstruction of justice. Weinberg contends these were acts of generosity to employees or friends and argues that, under the Aguilar Supreme Court precedent, these actions do not rise to federal obstruction because there was no pending judicial proceeding at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00015720.jpg
This document is a JPMorgan Asset Account application form for 'Financial Trust Company, Inc.' (an entity historically associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The form indicates the selection of the 'J.P. Morgan Prime Money Market Sweep Fund' and explicitly declines a Line of Credit. The document bears Bates stamps indicating it was produced as part of legal proceedings involving the SDNY and DOJ.
DOJ-OGR-00015686.jpg
This document is a photograph designated as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for a legal case. The image displays the interior of a wooden product featuring a sticker from the manufacturer, 'EARTHLITE', indicating it was made in Vista, California, USA. A separate notice label states that the product's materials comply with flammability requirements set by the California Bureau of Home Furnishings.
DOJ-OGR-00015212.jpg
This document is the first page of the Curriculum Vitae for Elizabeth F. Loftus, a Distinguished Professor at UC Irvine. It outlines her education, teaching experience, and honorary degrees. The document is stamped as a Defendant's Exhibit (EL-1) for the case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), which corresponds to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating Loftus was utilized as an expert witness for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001976.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 97) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (United States v. Boustani, Bradshaw, Chen, etc.) cited elsewhere in the filing. The page is numbered 'iii' and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001976.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity