CALIFORNIA
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Stogner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loni Hancock
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark DeSaulnier
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Implementation of California's new recreational cannabis law | California | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Court decision | The Supreme Court decided the case of Stogner v. California. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.
DOJ-OGR-00005247.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 354) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on October 15, 2021. The text argues that the Court has the authority to set an earlier deadline for the defense to file motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the rape shield law), citing various precedents to support the Government's request for an earlier briefing schedule. The document references multiple other cases (Andrews, Rivera, Dupigny, Backman, Valenzuela) to demonstrate that courts frequently set Rule 412 deadlines more than 14 days prior to trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002678.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a court filing dated February 4, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It lists legal precedents (cases), statutes, and rules relied upon in the main document. Key statutes cited include 18 U.S.C. § 2421, 2422, and 2423, which relate to the transportation of individuals for illegal sexual activity (Mann Act) and sexual exploitation of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00020337.jpg
This document is a legal filing dated May 17, 2021, requesting the district court to hold a hearing regarding the conditions of someone's confinement. It was respectfully submitted by attorneys Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus, representing their respective law firms.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019784.jpg
This page from the book "How America Lost Its Secrets" argues that Edward Snowden deliberately orchestrated leaks to compromise U.S. and British surveillance operations, including PRISM and NSA encryption capabilities. It details his coordination with journalists like Greenwald and Poitras and suggests that by recommending end-to-end encryption, Snowden compromised intelligence gathering on terrorist activities similar to how Robert Hanssen compromised operations in the 1990s.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019426.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report excerpt bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019426). It details the technical challenges, anticipated glitches, and testing issues surrounding the rollout of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) health insurance exchanges in various states (CA, OR, NV, DC) and at the federal level. Despite the user prompt, the document contains absolutely no text related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates; it is entirely focused on healthcare policy implementation circa 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018982.jpg
This document is a continuation of an incident report from the Palm Beach Police Department regarding Case No. 1-05-000368, involving Jeffrey Epstein. It details witness statements about recruiting underage girls for massages at Epstein's house, payments exchanged, and police interviews with involved parties, including a visit to a potential underage witness's home. The report notes that a witness compared herself to "Heidi Fliess" and that police used a tape recorder during a transport.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031702.jpg
This document is a fragment of a political analysis written shortly after the 2012 US Presidential election. The author criticizes President Obama's campaign tactics and appeals to specific demographic groups (Hispanics, women, unions) while lamenting that demographic shifts ('whites will soon be a minority') and 'shallow populism' defeated Romney and Ryan. The text predicts a move toward European socialism and a Hillary Clinton presidency in 2016, and specifically criticizes Jewish voters for supporting Obama over Israeli interests.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031636.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 2016 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E.), attorney Reid Weingarten, and Stan Pottinger. The conversation centers on a forwarded Guardian news article regarding a rape lawsuit filed against Donald Trump, which the article notes is linked to similar allegations against Epstein. Pottinger originally sent the article to Weingarten suggesting a catch-up, and the chain indicates Weingarten forwarded it to Epstein, who replied with a snippet of the article text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031616.jpg
An email chain from April 28, 2016, detailing a Reuters press inquiry regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The chain shows Martin Weinberg forwarding the inquiry to Epstein, who then discusses it with Michael Wolff; Wolff comments that Trump could likely 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance, while Epstein dismisses the accuser as 'deranaged' [sic].
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters journalist David Ingram to attorney Martin Weinberg, seeking comment on a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump committed rape in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to Kathy Ruemmler with the complaint attached. A significant portion of the communication between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.jpg
An email chain from April 2016 initiated by a Reuters reporter contacting Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this to Epstein, who forwards it to Michael Wolff. Wolff replies suggesting that 'Donald' (Trump) is the only person who can 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, originating with a Reuters reporter, David Ingram, contacting attorney Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email was forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein, and subsequently by Epstein to Lesley Groff, who responded with concern ('so sorry...'). Portions of the email chain between Weinberg and Epstein are redacted under privilege.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022105.jpg
This document contains an excerpt from a James Patterson book discussing the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights a declaration by victim Virginia Roberts regarding Epstein's motivation for procuring girls for his powerful friends to gain leverage over them. The text also details the dismissal of Roberts's motion to join a lawsuit against the government and Maxwell's subsequent denial of the allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022025.jpg
The document describes an attempt by Rodriguez to sell stolen information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, including lists of underage girls and famous contacts, to a lawyer for $50,000. The lawyer contacted the FBI, leading to a sting operation where Rodriguez met an undercover agent, admitted to possessing the stolen items, and was subsequently detained.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016535.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the lack of federal jurisdiction overlap in sexual assault cases compared to public corruption, noting that federal law usually only applies in specific instances like human trafficking or crimes on federal property. The footnotes extensively cite the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)) and various state constitutions regarding a victim's right to confer with the prosecution, a legal issue relevant to the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016522.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026628.jpg
This document contains a series of four charts comparing polling or sentiment data for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Debates. The data covers four states (California, Texas, North Carolina, and Florida) and tracks percentage points across the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd debates. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026596.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (numbers 57-72) from a legal or tax analysis document produced for the House Oversight Committee. It cites various tax regulations (Reg 1.752, Reg 1.881), treatises on partnership taxation from 2009, and specific rulings regarding Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Disregarded Entities (DREs). The content focuses on the technical tax treatment of pass-through entities across various US states.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020567.jpg
This document is page 108 of a House Oversight report (Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020567) discussing the hiring of former senior government officials by Chinese companies and foreign influence in US state and local politics. It details specific instances of financial influence, including a $120,000 donation to Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe by Chinese industrialist Wang Wenliang, and lobbying efforts by companies like BYD, Huawei, and Wanda. It also highlights a case involving the Imperial Pacific casino in Saipan hiring former CIA and FBI directors, and a 2017 FEC complaint regarding Dalian Wanda's funding of a California ballot initiative via a loan from a US company.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017774.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a page from a March 2003 Vanity Fair article profiling Jeffrey Epstein. It details his secretive financial management style, claiming he only accepts clients with over a billion dollars (specifically naming Leslie Wexner), and outlines his social circle, including Ghislaine Maxwell (described as his best friend who organizes his life) and high-profile dinner guests like Donald Trump, Mort Zuckerman, and Leon Black. The text also discusses his philosophy on wealth management and mentions his former employment at Bear Stearns.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016548.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes from the Minnesota Law Review, citing various legal cases, statutes, and news reports regarding police misconduct, officer-involved shootings, and criminal justice policies. It references specific incidents like the shootings of Philando Castile and Walter Scott, as well as legislative acts like the Death in Custody Reporting Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027026.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a news article or report discussing scientific advancements in human cloning and embryonic stem cell research conducted by a team at OHSU (Oregon Health & Science University). It details the methodology used (specifically the use of caffeine, dubbed 'the Starbucks effect'), the ethical debates surrounding egg donation and compensation, and the legal landscape in the United States regarding cloning. While Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned by name on this page, the content aligns with his known interests in transhumanism, genetic engineering, and scientific funding, and the document bears a House Oversight footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017711.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 76 of 78 in the specific file) analyzing changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 21, 32, and 60) regarding victims' rights and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee for not going far enough to ensure victims have a right to be heard during case transfer decisions and sentencing. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission related to the investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, specifically regarding victims' rights violations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity