FLORIDA
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014176.jpg
This document is a page from an address book containing contact information for individuals with surnames starting with P and Q. It includes high-profile individuals such as Nick and Thomas Pritzker (Hyatt), Princess Firyal, and David Puttnam. The entries provide residential and business addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses for locations including New York, Chicago, London, Florence, and Barcelona.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014118.jpg
This document is a sealed declaration filed by attorney Sigrid McCawley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of plaintiff Virginia Giuffre. The declaration supports a motion to compel discovery from Jeffrey Epstein and authenticates four attached exhibits. These exhibits include redacted phone records, Jeffrey Epstein's contact list, message pad excerpts, and a document related to 'Ghislaine' (presumably Maxwell).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014115.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, from the law firm SDBS to Thomas E. Scott, Jr., regarding the case *Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz*. The letter aggressively challenges the defense's discovery responses, accusing them of 'word play and gamesmanship' regarding document production, metadata, and definitions. The sender demands immediate production of documents and rejects the defense's attempts to limit discovery to a narrow timeframe, arguing that Dershowitz's alleged defamation and public denials were broad and unrestricted by time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014114.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, addressed to Thomas E. Scott, Jr. regarding the case *Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz*. The text outlines legal arguments concerning discovery abuses, specifically arguing that one cannot claim privilege or undue burden for documents that do not exist, and providing a broad legal definition of 'control' over documents to include those held by third parties like attorneys or accountants. The document was entered on the FLSD Docket on March 24, 2015, and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It contains the Defendant's responses to specific requests for production of documents. The requests seek evidence supporting the Defendant's assertions that attorney Paul G. Cassell acted unethically, corruptly, or in a 'sleazy' manner, and failed to investigate allegations made by Jane Doe #3.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014095.jpg
This document is page 5 of a 'Motion to Compel Production of Documents' in the case of Bradley Edwards vs. Alan Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072), filed in federal court on March 24, 2015. The text details a dispute over discovery delays, noting that on February 11, 2015, Dershowitz's legal team (specifically a paralegal from Cole, Scott & Kissane) promised documents that were then retracted by an attorney. By February 23, 2015, Dershowitz had produced zero documents, offering only 'evasive' standard responses objecting to requests for the 'absolute proof' he referenced in a sworn declaration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012145.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum authored by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing against federal prosecution of their client (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein). The text asserts that the alleged conduct—described controversially as 'consensual conduct' in a private home, even involving minors—is a matter for state (Florida/Palm Beach) jurisdiction rather than federal law. It cites various legal precedents, including United States v. Santos (2008), to argue for a narrow interpretation of federal criminal statutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012144.jpg
This document is a legal submission from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that the Florida State Attorney's Office has already investigated and charged Epstein as a 'local John' for soliciting prostitution, and that under the DOJ's 'Petite Policy,' federal prosecution is precluded following state action. The defense minimizes the allegations, asserting the women were over 16, acted voluntarily, and were not 'trolled' at high schools.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012142.jpg
A legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The document characterizes Epstein as a 'successful businessman' and an 'ordinary John,' arguing that his conduct constitutes state-level prostitution offenses rather than federal crimes like sex trafficking. It asserts he did not use interstate commerce (internet/phone) to induce minors and claims the relevant conduct is time-barred under Florida state law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012138.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The letter argues that a new Grand Jury subpoena violates Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and asserts that the investigation in New York lacks the federal elements (internet luring, coercion, etc.) necessary for prosecution. The defense claims that three principal accusers (names redacted) have given sworn statements that contradict the prosecution's case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033473.jpg
This document appears to be a raw metadata dump (JSON format) representing a digital news article or media asset. It contains technical specifications for fonts (specifically CNN Sans), image assets with unique identifiers (UUIDs), and styling information. The content refers to a news story titled 'Florida Democratic congressional candidate dies unexpectedly.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033473' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a larger government investigation file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032433.jpg
This document is an email chain from January 11-12, 2017, between attorney Reid Weingarten and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation'). They discuss meeting in New York or Florida, with Epstein noting his birthday is on Friday. Weingarten excuses his scheduling uncertainty by stating he is trying to 'deliver El Chapo' to the Obama administration rather than the incoming Trump administration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032433.jpg
An email thread from January 2017 between attorney Reid Weingarten and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation'). They discuss coordinating a meeting in Florida or New York around the time of Epstein's birthday. Notably, Weingarten mentions he is busy trying to 'deliver El Chapo to Barack instead of Trump,' referencing the extradition of the cartel leader during the presidential transition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030231.jpg
This document contains the text of a Daily Mail article by Stephen Wright reporting on phone logs found at Jeffrey Epstein's Florida home. The article details messages from young women and schoolchildren arranging massages and references Epstein's connections to high-profile figures including Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, Donald Trump, and Harvey Weinstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030230.jpg
An email chain from March 10, 2011, involving Ross Gow (Acuity Reputation), 'GMAX' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), and Brian Basham discussing PR strategy regarding media coverage of Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'). The discussion focuses on correcting a headline, the definition of 'school' versus 'university' in the US, and the nuances of Florida's age of consent laws (Statute 794.05). Ross Gow's portion includes text from a media code of conduct regarding payments to criminals for stories.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity