| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This document is page 8 of a December 2017 Cannabis Investment Report by Ackrell Capital, LLC. It analyzes the growth of the legal cannabis markets in California and Canada, predicting significant expansion in 2018 due to legislative changes like the Cannabis Act. The report also discusses the evolution of consumer products towards 'mainstream' acceptance, highlighting innovations in product types (concentrates, infused products) and the increasing sophistication of dispensaries and branding.
This document is a biographical executive summary for 'KUE' (Knowledge Universe Education), likely part of a larger House Oversight report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024582). It details the professional backgrounds of three key executives: Vice Chairman Ted Sanders, SVP Stephen Goldsmith, and SVP Nina Shokraii Rees, highlighting their extensive experience in education policy, government service (including roles in the Bush administrations), and academia. The document also briefly references Mr. Milken's (Michael Milken) education at the top.
This document is a financial summary and projection for an organization identified as 'k12' (likely K12 Inc.), covering fiscal years 2002 through projected 2007. It details revenue growth from $6.7 million in 2002 to a projected $132.2 million in 2007, driven by expansion into new states and grades, though the company operated at a net loss for the recorded historical years (2002-2005). The text outlines the company's operational history, expansion into specific states (CO, PA, OH, ID, CA, AR, MN, AZ, FL, WI, DC, TX, WY, WA), future opportunities in Chicago and Sacramento, and its revenue recognition policies regarding virtual charter school management.
This document appears to be a page from an investment report or business overview regarding 'k12' (K12 Inc.), a virtual education company. It details the company's business model, profitability (noting higher margins due to lack of physical infrastructure), and presence in various US states during the 2006 fiscal year. The document highlights financial projections, specifically a revenue increase in district-managed programs from $3 million in 2006 to a projected $11 million in 2008, and references a 2001 KPMG study validating their curriculum quality.
This document appears to be a page from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' (page 124) included in a House Oversight evidence file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015814). The text discusses scientific theories regarding consciousness, specifically the 'Orch OR' theory by Penrose and Hameroff involving tubulin protein and quantum gravity computing in the brain. It references recent work by Travis Craddock at Nova Southeastern University. While the text itself is purely scientific, its inclusion in this specific evidence dump suggests it may relate to Jeffrey Epstein's known funding of and interest in theoretical physics and consciousness research.
This document appears to be page 65 of a manuscript or memoir, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text describes the narrator's relationship with a hypersensitive woman in Florida, detailing their sexual experiences, her extreme sensory reactions to smells and music, and her 'synesthetic' descriptions of pain. It concludes with the narrator reflecting on a pattern of attracting similar women who combined this heightened sensory awareness with intense religious experiences in Pentecostal settings.
This document is a first-person statement, likely by Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing the handling of his plea deal and subsequent civil suits. He alleges that the government violated the spirit of his agreement, that an opposing attorney engaged in nepotism and excessive billing ($800,000), and that the accusers were unreliable witnesses who worked in the sex trade. He defends himself by claiming he was merely a 'consumer of prostitution' rather than a trafficker and explains he took the plea deal to avoid a mandatory 10-year sentence and a biased trial.
This document is a statistical table produced by Laffer Associates, titled 'Table 1 Primaries Completed as of May 3rd' and updated on July 6, 2016. It analyzes voter turnout for Republican and Democrat primaries across various US states for the years 2008, 2012, and 2016, calculating percentage increases and partisan advantages. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional document production.
This document is page 161 of a 2018 report by Ackrell Capital titled 'Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies.' It profiles four specific companies: Trellis, Trulieve, Utopia Farms, and VapeWorld, providing their locations, websites, and brief business descriptions. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024797, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 100 of a confidential Private Placement Memorandum (Control Number 257) produced for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024111). It outlines legal offering notices and regulatory disclaimers for potential investors in Florida, Non-U.S. residents generally, Australia, Austria, and Belgium. The text specifies that the fund is not registered in these jurisdictions and sets out the legal conditions under which the securities may be privately offered, including a minimum investment threshold of €100,000 for Belgian investors.
This document is a printout of a Daily Beast article discussing a widened Justice Department and FBI probe into Jeffrey Epstein for child trafficking, specifically looking into his friend Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 modeling agency. It highlights that while Epstein cannot be prosecuted again for charges covered by his 2007 non-prosecution agreement (double jeopardy), new evidence or victims could lead to federal trafficking charges which carry a 20-year sentence. The article also criticizes the special treatment Epstein received, noting his high-profile connections and the failure to enforce mandatory psychological evaluations.
This document is page 7 of a business prospectus for 'Twin City Care of The Virgin Islands' (TCMIH), detailing their Mobile Phlebotomy services. It outlines the scope of their services, including home blood draws and specimen collection, and emphasizes adherence to medical standards. The document highlights the appointment of Dr. Christopher C. Hill (based in Florida) as the Medical Director to ensure CAAS compliance and medical oversight.
This document is a cover letter for a 'Business Expansion Portfolio and Prospectus' from Twin City Care of The Virgin Islands addressed to Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The letter introduces Twin City Mobile Integrated Health Services (TCMIH) as a non-profit ambulance and medical transport provider in the Virgin Islands, detailing their certifications, staff qualifications, and community role. It is signed by the company's President, CEO, and COO, indicating a solicitation for business or investment.
This document is a page from a 2018 Tax Bulletin analyzing the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It compares 2017 and 2018 laws regarding itemized deductions, retirement savings, AMT, and carried interest. The 'Observations' section specifically highlights how the new laws benefit high-wage earners in no-tax states like Florida while potentially increasing taxes for high earners in high-tax jurisdictions like New York City. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document, part of a 2017 House Oversight filing, recounts the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how police sought serious molestation charges, but State Attorney Barry Krischer presented lesser charges to a grand jury, leading to accusations of preferential treatment. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile connections, including Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz, and financial ties to Harvard and politicians like Eliot Spitzer and Bill Richardson.
This document is a page from a 2017 court filing (House Oversight) containing a reprint of a news article detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the original Epstein investigation. It highlights defense attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Mr. Lefcourt's efforts to discredit accusers using MySpace posts and criminal history, while noting Police Chief Reiter's frustration with the prosecutor's delay in issuing arrest warrants and convening a grand jury.
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from May 25, 2017, detailing facts supporting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. It outlines Jeffrey Epstein's history as a sex offender, his controversial 2008 plea deal involving the DOJ, and his connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. The text specifically describes a FOIA request submitted on April 20, 2017, by James Robertson of the National Enquirer, seeking FBI records regarding the investigation into Epstein.
This legal document, dated September 12, 2013, outlines attorney Edwards' defense against Epstein's claims of improper litigation tactics. Edwards asserts he had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and depositions from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—believing they possessed relevant information regarding Epstein's alleged sexual assaults. The document argues these individuals were identified as Epstein's 'close friends' and that seeking their testimony met the legal standard for discovery.
This document, dated September 12, 2013, is a legal defense of attorney Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that Edwards did not 'pump' cases to investors, noting that he filed complaints against Epstein long before meeting Scott Rothstein or joining RRA. The text highlights that Epstein settled three cases (including one for 'Jane Doe') in July 2010 for significant sums via court-ordered mediation presided over by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, and that the Florida Bar dismissed Epstein's ethics complaint against Edwards.
This document, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025876, contains a list of probing biographical and investigative questions directed at Jeffrey Epstein. It covers his early life, education, time at Bear Stearns, high-profile connections (Clinton, Barak, Google founders, Princess Diana), real estate holdings (Paris, Manhattan), and allegations regarding 'Jack Shacks' and police investigations in Palm Beach. The questions appear to be prepared for an interview or deposition, specifically referencing media profiles by Vanity Fair and New York Magazine.
This document is page 98 of a legal text or law review article (Vol. 104) authored by 'Cassell et al.' (likely Paul Cassell). It discusses the statutory rights of crime victims across various U.S. states, specifically focusing on the requirement for prosecutors to confer with victims regarding plea negotiations and charging decisions. The text cites various state statutes (Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana) and legal studies to argue that victims' rights often attach prior to the formal filing of charges, a relevant legal argument in the context of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement controversy.
This document is page 62 of a legal article (Cassell et al.) included in House Oversight records. It argues that Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) rights should attach before formal charges are filed, explicitly using the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement in Florida as a case study where victims were denied consultation because charges were not formally filed. The text critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) position and references a 2011 letter from Senator Jon Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder supporting the broader interpretation of victims' rights.
This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal transcript, likely a deposition involving House Oversight. A witness is questioned about their knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with academics in Florida and New York, and specifically whether they knew Epstein had an office at Harvard (which the witness denies). The page concludes with an attorney, Mr. Scarola, interrupting to note that the session must end at 4:30 PM per a prior agreement.
This document is page 118 of a rough draft transcript, likely from a Congressional hearing or deposition (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT). The dialogue concerns a previous deposition where a subject (possibly Mr. Dershowitz or an associate like Epstein) broadly invoked the Fifth Amendment and used tactics to feign ignorance of people he knew. The witness and questioner discuss the legal implications of taking the Fifth in civil litigation within the jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit (Florida), specifically whether one person's invocation can be used as evidence against another.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (115) from a House Oversight proceeding. A speaker details an incident of witness intimidation where a large private investigator hired by Jeffrey Epstein parked outside the Florida home of a witness named 'S.R.' and shone high-beams into her house just days before a trial. The intimidation caused S.R. to flee her home, and the speaker discusses legal motions filed to protect her and concerns regarding communications with Mr. Dershowitz.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity