003.pdf
79.9 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
79.9 KB
Summary
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-80069-CIV-MARRA). Dated January 28, 2008, Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer and file a joint scheduling and discovery report. It outlines procedural deadlines for pretrial discovery and scheduling conferences pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in Case No. 08-80069-CIV-MARRA
|
| Jane Doe No. 1 | Plaintiff |
Minor or protected individual suing by and through guardians
|
| Jane Doe's Father | Plaintiff/Guardian |
Suing as parent and natural guardian, and individually
|
| Jane Doe's Stepmother | Plaintiff |
Suing individually
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | Judge |
United States District Judge signing the order
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed
|
Timeline (2 events)
2008-01-29
Document entered on FLSD Docket
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Chambers where order was signed
|
|
|
County where order was signed
|
Relationships (3)
Described as 'JANE DOE'S FATHER as parent and natural guardian'
Described as 'JANE DOE'S STEPMOTHER'
Plaintiff vs Defendant in lawsuit
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,960 characters)
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.08-80069-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE NO. 1 by and through
JANE DOE'S FATHER as parent and natural
guardian, and JANE DOE'S FATHER, and
JANE DOE'S STEPMOTHER, individually,
JANE DOE'S FATHER as parent and natural
guardian, and JANE DOE'S FATHER, and
JANE DOE'S STEPMOTHER, individually,
Plaintiff,
vs.
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
_____________________________________/
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of
this order.
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of
this order.
It is further ORDERED:
1. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is
excluded under Rule 26(a)(1)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the
filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, to consider the nature and
basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of
excluded under Rule 26(a)(1)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the
filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, to consider the nature and
basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of
Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 2 of 2
the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a
proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties’ views and proposals concerning the matters
listed in Rule 26(f).
proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties’ views and proposals concerning the matters
listed in Rule 26(f).
4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference
outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as
the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter.
See Local Rule 16.1(B).
the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter.
See Local Rule 16.1(B).
6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint
scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed
month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an
indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed
month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an
indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the
scheduling conference report.
scheduling conference report.
8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint
scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including
attorney’s fees and costs.
scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including
attorney’s fees and costs.
DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida,
this 28th day of January, 2008.
this 28th day of January, 2008.
[Signature]
KENNETH A. MARRA
United States District Judge
KENNETH A. MARRA
United States District Judge
Copies furnished to:
All counsel
All counsel
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document