| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Submission of arguments regarding proposed bail package. | Court | View |
This document contains internal FBI emails from April 2021 coordinating logistical support for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Squad C-20 requested agents to assist in monitoring Maxwell and securing the proffer rooms while she met with her defense team and reviewed evidence from April 13-15, 2021. The emails detail the specific security protocols, including the transfer of custody from US Marshals to FBI agents within the building.
This document contains an email chain from April 2021 detailing the logistics for the 'GM Evidence Review' (Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines procedures for her defense team to review evidence at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse starting April 13, 2021, and at a Bronx warehouse on April 12, 2021. The email discusses security measures involving US Marshals, the presence of AUSAs and FBI agents, and references attached spreadsheets listing evidence from New York and Florida.
Internal FBI emails from April 2021 coordinating agent coverage for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review sessions at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Squad C-20 requested agents equipped with handcuff keys to monitor Maxwell and escort her from the US Marshals' custody to proffer rooms where she reviewed evidence with her defense team. The communications detail the logistics of custody transfer, room assignments, and the extension of the review period.
This document is an internal FBI email chain from November 2020 regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. Squad C-20 was seeking two volunteer agents to assist in showing digital discovery (via laptop and hard drive) to Maxwell and her defense team at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) on November 6, 2020.
This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 9, 2020. It confirms the readiness of the 'Sixth Production' of discovery materials for the defense in the 'US v. Maxwell' case, specifically mentioning the upload of iPhone data labeled 'NYC024318 1B71'. The email also discusses the creation of a specific index and drive for the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center).
This document is a page from a Protective Order in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 27, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling 'Discovery' materials, limiting their use by both government and defense witnesses and counsel solely for preparation for the criminal trial. The order explicitly prohibits using the information for civil proceedings and forbids any party, including the Defendant and defense team, from posting the Discovery or its contents on the Internet.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorneys Weinberg and Rossmiller discuss the history of the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Court, specifically referencing a March 2008 meeting in Washington between the defense and the DOJ's Criminal Division/Child Exploitation Unit. The discussion highlights that the defense argued the case lacked interstate elements needed for federal prosecution, and the DOJ subsequently issued a letter in May 2008 endorsing prosecutorial discretion due to the 'unusual' facts of the case.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown (likely E... | $0.00 | Epstein 'bought himself one of the best defense... | View |
Statement explaining Maxwell was following security protocols, not evading arrest.
States it is 'highly unlikely' the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.
Stating it is 'highly unlikely' the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.
Defense would appeal the office's position to Washington.
Submissions raising new issues.
Interview regarding when Epstein lived at the property.
Argument regarding scientific evidence validity and contamination.
Confirming Marshals can bring Maxwell to 500 Pearl by 8am; requesting list of defense team attendees.
Argues the government's stance on French extradition law is incorrect.
Argues the government's assertion on French extradition law is incorrect.
Submission of vetted financial documents detailing personal and joint assets.
Financial documents vetted by accounting firm providing details on assets.
Rules regarding the dissemination of victim/witness identities found in discovery materials.
Argued that danger posed by Epstein has abated and conditions of release can assure safety.
Page 4 of a letter arguing that federal statutes (1591, 2422, 2423) do not apply to Epstein's conduct and that state prosecution is sufficient.
Stated federal prosecution would not be improper but noted defense arguments were compelling.
Meeting in Washington regarding federal prosecution jurisdiction.
Meeting regarding USAO improprieties
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity