Unknown (likely Epstein's legal defense team)

Person
Mentions
15
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
7
Also known as:
Defense Team defense team

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-04-01 N/A Submission of arguments regarding proposed bail package. Court View

EFTA00038577.pdf

This document contains internal FBI emails from April 2021 coordinating logistical support for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Squad C-20 requested agents to assist in monitoring Maxwell and securing the proffer rooms while she met with her defense team and reviewed evidence from April 13-15, 2021. The emails detail the specific security protocols, including the transfer of custody from US Marshals to FBI agents within the building.

Fbi email chain / internal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00038575.pdf

This document contains an email chain from April 2021 detailing the logistics for the 'GM Evidence Review' (Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines procedures for her defense team to review evidence at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse starting April 13, 2021, and at a Bronx warehouse on April 12, 2021. The email discusses security measures involving US Marshals, the presence of AUSAs and FBI agents, and references attached spreadsheets listing evidence from New York and Florida.

Email chain / fbi internal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00038560.pdf

Internal FBI emails from April 2021 coordinating agent coverage for Ghislaine Maxwell's evidence review sessions at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Squad C-20 requested agents equipped with handcuff keys to monitor Maxwell and escort her from the US Marshals' custody to proffer rooms where she reviewed evidence with her defense team. The communications detail the logistics of custody transfer, room assignments, and the extension of the review period.

Fbi email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00038209.pdf

This document is an internal FBI email chain from November 2020 regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. Squad C-20 was seeking two volunteer agents to assist in showing digital discovery (via laptop and hard drive) to Maxwell and her defense team at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) on November 6, 2020.

Fbi email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00030562.pdf

This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 9, 2020. It confirms the readiness of the 'Sixth Production' of discovery materials for the defense in the 'US v. Maxwell' case, specifically mentioning the upload of iPhone data labeled 'NYC024318 1B71'. The email also discusses the creation of a specific index and drive for the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center).

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00001651.jpg

This document is a page from a Protective Order in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 27, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling 'Discovery' materials, limiting their use by both government and defense witnesses and counsel solely for preparation for the criminal trial. The order explicitly prohibits using the information for civil proceedings and forbids any party, including the Defendant and defense team, from posting the Discovery or its contents on the Internet.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000534.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorneys Weinberg and Rossmiller discuss the history of the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Court, specifically referencing a March 2008 meeting in Washington between the defense and the DOJ's Criminal Division/Child Exploitation Unit. The discussion highlights that the defense argued the case lacked interstate elements needed for federal prosecution, and the DOJ subsequently issued a letter in May 2008 endorsing prosecutorial discretion due to the 'unusual' facts of the case.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
1 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Unknown (likely E... $0.00 Epstein 'bought himself one of the best defense... View
As Sender
10
As Recipient
8
Total
18

Exhibit S

From: [Redacted Head of Secu...
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Statement explaining Maxwell was following security protocols, not evading arrest.

Statement
N/A

Expert Report on Extradition

From: William JULIÉ
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

States it is 'highly unlikely' the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.

Report
N/A

Extradition likelihood

From: William JULIÉ
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Stating it is 'highly unlikely' the French government would refuse to extradite Ms. Maxwell.

Expert report
N/A

Appeals

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Public via Washington ...

Defense would appeal the office's position to Washington.

Meeting/negotiation
N/A

Issues not previously raised with USAO

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Department's Criminal ...

Submissions raising new issues.

Defense submissions
N/A

Employment and Epstein's residence

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Unnamed witness

Interview regarding when Epstein lived at the property.

Interview
N/A

Appeal for Dr. Sybers

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Appellate Court

Argument regarding scientific evidence validity and contamination.

Legal argument
N/A

RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

From: Assistant United State...
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Confirming Marshals can bring Maxwell to 500 Pearl by 8am; requesting list of defense team attendees.

Email
2021-04-09

French Extradition Law

From: William JULIÉ
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Argues the government's stance on French extradition law is incorrect.

Legal opinion
2021-03-23

Exhibit A

From: William JULIÉ
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Argues the government's assertion on French extradition law is incorrect.

Legal opinion
2021-03-23

Financial Documents

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Government and Court

Submission of vetted financial documents detailing personal and joint assets.

Submission
2021-03-23

Financial Documents

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Court/Government

Financial documents vetted by accounting firm providing details on assets.

Submission
2021-03-22

Protective Order regarding Discovery

From: Court/Government
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Rules regarding the dissemination of victim/witness identities found in discovery materials.

Court filing
2020-07-30

Defense submission regarding bail/release

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: THE COURT

Argued that danger posed by Epstein has abated and conditions of release can assure safety.

Letter
2019-07-24

Legal arguments against federal prosecution of Epstein

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Mark Filip

Page 4 of a letter arguing that federal statutes (1591, 2422, 2423) do not apply to Epstein's conduct and that state prosecution is sufficient.

Letter
2008-05-19

Review of Epstein case

From: CEOs of a national IT ...
To: Unknown (likely Epstei...

Stated federal prosecution would not be improper but noted defense arguments were compelling.

Letter
2008-05-15

Jurisdiction and Prosecution

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: Criminal Division and ...

Meeting in Washington regarding federal prosecution jurisdiction.

Meeting
2008-03-01

Defense presents USAO improprieties and 'watered-down' re...

From: Unknown (likely Epstei...
To: USAO

Meeting regarding USAO improprieties

Conference call
2008-01-07

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity