The Court (implied)

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
0

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-11-15 Meeting An in-person conference scheduled for 9:30 a.m. to resolve any disputes, if necessary. N/A View
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
19
Total
20

Briefing on New Mexico state law

From: the government
To: The Court (implied)

Mr. Rohrbach mentions a letter in which the government briefed the court on the 'complex question of New Mexico state law' regarding the age of consent.

Letter
N/A

Proposed redaction

From: defense (implied)
To: The Court (implied)

A letter is mentioned by the Court which indicated that the defense would propose a more tailored redaction for an exhibit.

Letter
N/A

Translation and interpretation of Article 694-4 of the Fr...

From: Ministry of Justice
To: The Court (implied)

A translated letter, cited in a footnote, provides a version of French law stating that citizenship is assessed at the time of the offense for which removal is requested.

Letter
N/A

Briefing on New Mexico state law

From: the government
To: The Court (implied)

Mr. Rohrbach mentions a letter in which the government briefed the court on the 'complex question of New Mexico state law' regarding the age of consent.

Letter
N/A

Delayed delivery of Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal mail

From: the government
To: The Court (implied)

A letter referenced as (Dkt. 350) in which the government responded to concerns about delayed mail, which Sternheim describes as merely parroting the MDC's excuses.

Letter
N/A

Proposed redacted exhibits

From: the parties
To: The Court (implied)

Mr. Rohrbach anticipates that the parties will provide a letter to the court later in the day detailing the proposed redacted exhibits for the closing arguments.

Letter
2022-08-10

Proposed redacted exhibits

From: the parties
To: The Court (implied)

Mr. Rohrbach anticipates that the parties will provide a letter to the court later in the day detailing the proposed redacted exhibits for the closing arguments.

Letter
2022-08-10

Support for Ghislaine and description of her pre-trial de...

From: Isabel Maxwell
To: The Court (implied)

Isabel Maxwell writes to describe the harsh conditions of Ghislaine's pre-trial detention at MDC Brooklyn, express admiration for her resilience, and argue that she is not a threat to society, hoping for her release.

Letter
2022-06-15

Application for relief

From: Lara Pomerantz (Assist...
To: The Court (implied)

Requesting that the annexed application be granted and stating no prior request has been made.

Legal filing
2022-03-07

Attorney Glassman

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: The Court (implied)

A letter from Ms. Maxwell's side regarding the testimony of Attorney Glassman.

Letter
2021-12-03

Jury Selection / Witness Inconvenience (inferred from text)

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: The Court (implied)

Argument regarding the government's focus on witness inconvenience over fair jury selection.

Legal letter/filing
2021-10-27

Voir Dire procedures

From: The Court (implied)
To: Parties

Discussion on probing jurors for dishonesty.

Transcript
2021-10-21

Request to remand a matter to the trial court for proceed...

From: DAVID OSCAR MARKUS
To: The Court (implied)

The document is a legal filing arguing that a client's conditions of confinement make trial preparation impossible and requests the case be sent back to the trial court for an adversarial hearing.

Legal filing
2021-04-19

Request to remand a matter to the trial court for proceed...

From: DAVID OSCAR MARKUS
To: The Court (implied)

The document is a legal filing arguing that a client's conditions of confinement make trial preparation impossible and requests the case be sent back to the trial court for an adversarial hearing.

Legal filing
2021-04-19

Support for Ghislaine

From: Redacted author
To: The Court (implied)

A letter written to attest to Ghislaine's character, describing her as a kind, dedicated, and emotionally supportive person. The author expresses a personal obligation to support her during her legal proceedings.

Letter of support
2020-12-14

Conditions of Detention

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: The Court (implied)

Complaint regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's solitary confinement and the BOP's handling of her detention in response to Epstein's suicide.

Letter
2020-12-07

Defendant's flight risk

From: Government (Implied)
To: The Court (implied)

A letter cited in a footnote (7/12/19 Ltr. 5) arguing that the defendant could easily transfer assets out of the country and flee.

Letter
2019-07-12

Defendant's flight risk

From: Government (Implied)
To: The Court (implied)

A letter from 7/12/19 is cited, arguing that the defendant could easily transfer assets out of the country and flee.

Letter
2019-07-12

Request for order unsealing appellate briefs

From: Davis Wright Tremaine ...
To: The Court (implied)

Requesting the unsealing of appellate briefs with victim names redacted and arguing against the burden of the Post notifying victims.

Legal motion
2018-01-11

Submission of information

From: Ms. Brune's team
To: The Court (implied)

A letter submitted following the review of email traffic.

Letter
0021-07-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity