| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Kito de Boer
|
Co participants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Meghan O
|
Professional advisory |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting discussion regarding Geopolitics and MENA economics | Unknown | View |
This document appears to be a transcript or minutes from a high-level foreign policy meeting (likely circa 2011-2012) discussing the geopolitical implications of the Arab Spring, oil economics, and the US 'Pivot to Asia.' Speakers including Gfoeller, 'Mehgan,' and Bob Blackwill analyze the stability of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the fall of Mubarak in Egypt, and the potential for nuclear proliferation in Iran. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT,' indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document is a meeting summary or briefing paper (labeled page 12) discussing geopolitical strategy regarding Iran's nuclear program and Middle East energy production. The text outlines potential military options against Iran, asserting US superiority over Israeli capabilities, and summarizes 'Meghan O's' analysis that Middle East oil supply may decline due to internal instability, contrasting this with the US 'Energy Revolution' (shale/fracking). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation.
This document contains notes from a high-level foreign policy meeting in Aspen (likely the Aspen Strategy Group around 2012). The notes, summarized by 'TJP', detail discussions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, instability in Syria and Egypt, and a significant focus on potential military action against Iran. Prominent figures like Steve Hadley, Bill Perry, and representatives for both Obama (Podesta) and Romney (Pawlenty) discussed the timeline for Iran's nuclear capabilities and the consequences of a military strike.
This document appears to be a transcript or minutes from a high-level strategic meeting (possibly the Trilateral Commission or similar forum) discussing Middle Eastern geopolitics. The conversation covers the stability of Iraq under 'NAM' (Nouri al-Maliki), tensions between Kurds, Baghdad, and Ankara, and the economic fallout of the Arab Spring, with specific commentary from 'TJP' (likely Thomas Pritzker) and Kito de Boer of McKinsey.
This document appears to be a transcript or summary of a policy discussion regarding the US withdrawal from Iraq. The dialogue, primarily between 'Maghan O’' and 'Jim Steinberg', debates whether the Obama administration did enough to secure a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to keep residual troops in the region. The text highlights concerns about Nouri al-Maliki (NAM) consolidating power and the potential alienation of the Kurds following the US departure.
A document containing notes summarized by 'TJP' (likely Thomas J. Pritzker) from an Aspen Strategy Group meeting regarding US Policy on Arab Revolutions. The document records a debate between various foreign policy experts and former administration officials (Indyk, Feaver, Kahl, Flournoy, etc.) concerning the Obama administration's handling of the Arab Spring, specifically situations in Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. The document bears a House Oversight bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein/JP Morgan probes given the known context of these document releases.
Summary of Meghan O's analysis on Middle East energy and geopolitical stability.
Summary of a debate regarding US foreign policy in the Middle East.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity