SJRC
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017923.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) regarding *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*. It discusses the court's jurisdiction over defendants Wa'el Jalaidan and the Rabita Trust, detailing Jalaidan's alleged role as a founder and logistics chief for al Qaeda and his connections to Osama bin Laden. While the document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017923), often associated with broader financial investigations, the text itself focuses strictly on 9/11 terrorist financing liability and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017916.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion (*In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) status of Saudi defendants. It details the court's denial of a motion to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif regarding a 1998 article linking Saudi charities to al Qaida, citing lack of authentication. It also establishes the 'Saudi High Commission' (SHC) as an organ of the Saudi government, noting Prince Salman's role as its President. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017915.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, specifically discussing allegations against Saudi Princes Salman and Naif. It details claims that Prince Salman and Prince Naif used their positions and various charities (such as the SHC, IIRO, and SJRC) to fund and support Islamic militants, including Al Qaeda and Hamas, in regions like Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Palestine. The text cites various complaints alleging the princes knowingly supported terrorist networks and ignored warnings from Western governments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017898.jpg
This document is page 833 from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding motions to dismiss by various banking defendants. The text details the court's decision to grant Al Rajhi Bank's motion to dismiss due to a lack of factual allegations connecting the bank to terrorist financing. It also introduces background on the Saudi American Bank, its formation from Citibank branches, and allegations regarding its employees' potential ties to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017896.jpg
This document is a page from a judicial opinion regarding claims against Al Rajhi Bank related to the September 11 attacks. It details allegations that the bank provided financial services to terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda and Hamas, failed to implement anti-money laundering controls despite warnings, and held accounts for 9/11 hijackers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023392.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to the 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses the liability of financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank and Dubai Islamic Bank, for allegedly knowingly providing financial services to Al-Qaeda. The text details how various charities (al Haramain, WAMY, MWL, IIRO, SJRC, BIFs) served as fundraising fronts for Al-Qaeda and links them to specific historical terrorist attacks prior to 9/11. While stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the document text itself focuses exclusively on terrorist financing and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023388.jpg
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal printout (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It outlines legal arguments criticizing a district court for ignoring plaintiffs' pleadings against Al Rajhi Bank. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank knowingly provided material support, banking services, and donation management to al-Qaeda and several front charities (IIRO, MWL, WAMY, etc.), as well as providing services to 9/11 hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023381.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the financial infrastructure supporting al-Qaeda, specifically implicating financial institutions such as Al Shamal, FIBS, Al Rajhi Bank, and National Commercial Bank (NCB) in knowingly providing services and funneling money to the terrorist organization. The text cites testimony confirming that high-ranking banking officials had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and that the banks used charity fronts to channel funds for 'financial jihad.' Note: While labeled as an Epstein-related document request, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it focuses entirely on 9/11 terrorist financing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023379.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) originating from a House Oversight Committee production. It details the interconnectivity between purported Islamic charities (MWL, IIRO, SJRC) and Al-Qaeda leadership, specifically outlining how charity officials appointed known terrorists like Wa'el Jelaidan and Mohammed Jamal Khalifa to positions of power to facilitate funding and logistics for attacks, including the 1993 WTC bombing and the Bojinka plot. While part of a dataset potentially reviewed in Epstein-related investigations (likely regarding foreign financing), the text itself focuses exclusively on Al-Qaeda financing and 9/11 litigation without mentioning Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (specifically 2012 WL 257568) regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It details procedural history concerning the dismissal of claims against numerous defendants, including Saudi banks (Al Rajhi, SAMBA), organizations (Saudi Red Crescent), and individuals (multiple members of the Bin Laden family). The text discusses the impact of the 'Doe v. Bin Laden' decision on jurisdictional arguments under the FSIA (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) and mentions motions to vacate previous dismissals. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity