Sanchez
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Defense prosecution negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Defense team |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Communicated sent letter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Communicated via letter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Communicated email |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Matt Menchel
|
Communicated spoke to |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Correspondence |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-09-07 | Meeting | Acosta, other USAO Attorneys, and FBI Supervisors meet with Epstein's attorneys. | N/A | View |
| 2007-08-22 | Agreement | Defense counsel Sanchez reached out to Lourie and they agreed to a joint request for a stay of li... | N/A | View |
| 2007-08-02 | Plea proposal | Epstein's defense team proposed a sentence involving no mandatory incarceration, but rather home ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-07-31 | N/A | USAO presents NPA term sheet | Unknown | View |
| 2007-07-31 | N/A | Meeting: USAO presents NPA term sheet | Unknown | View |
| 2007-07-31 | Meeting | A meeting occurred between Epstein's defense team and the prosecution, which was followed up by a... | N/A | View |
| 2007-07-31 | Meeting | The USAO presented its plea proposal to Epstein's defense team. The defense countered, arguing ag... | N/A | View |
| 2007-07-03 | Communication | Villafaña emailed colleagues about her intent to initiate plea discussions with Sanchez. | N/A | View |
| 2007-06-29 | Communication | Sanchez emailed Villafaña requesting a two-week extension for producing computer equipment. | N/A | View |
| 2007-06-26 | Meeting | A meeting occurred, after which Sanchez emailed Villafaña. | N/A | View |
| 2007-06-26 | Meeting | A meeting between USAO personnel and Epstein's defense team, where the defense presented their ar... | Miami USAO | View |
| 2007-06-26 | Plea discussion | The USAO's first plea overture to defense counsel, where Menchel spoke with Sanchez about a state... | N/A | View |
| 2007-06-26 | N/A | Meeting: Defense presents legal issues, investigation improprieties, and federal jurisdiction issues | Unknown | View |
| 2007-02-20 | N/A | Defense presents witness issues | Unknown | View |
| 2007-02-20 | N/A | Meeting: Defense presents witness issues | Unknown | View |
| 2007-02-20 | N/A | Follow-up meeting where defense counsel provided recordings. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-02-01 | N/A | Defense Counsel Meet with Lourie and Villafaña | USAO Office (implied) | View |
| 2007-02-01 | N/A | Meeting: Defense presents investigation improprieties and federal jurisdiction issues | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Communication | Sanchez emailed Villafaña regarding the submission of materials and a potential state-based resol... | N/A | View |
| 2003-01-01 | Dating | Menchel and Sanchez had a social relationship that included a 'handful of dates over a period of ... | N/A | View |
| 0022-09-01 | N/A | Weekend negotiation deadline | Via Phone/Email | View |
EFTA00034979.pdf
This document is a Daily Lieutenant's Log from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York for July 31, 2019. It details operational events across three shifts (Morning, Day, Evening), including inmate counts, movements to hospitals and SHU, and facility issues. Notably, the log reports that the fire alarm, pump system, and public address system were inoperable or malfunctioning, requiring a 'Fire Watch' protocol.
EFTA00033653.pdf
This document is a Daily Activity Report from MCC New York dated August 1, 2019, covering activities from July 31, 2019. It details a significant security breach where inmate Davis was caught with a cellphone and hid it in his body cavity, resulting in his transfer to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) pending FBI referral. The report also highlights significant staffing shortages, noting 9 staff members as AWOL and specific posts on 10-South and 11-South left unassigned due to these shortages.
EFTA00032191.pdf
This document is a blank template for the 'PDS-BEMR Suicide Risk Assessment Guide - Version 3'. It provides a structured protocol for evaluating inmates for suicide risk, including checklists for static and dynamic risk factors, protective factors, and mental status exams. The guide defines various levels of lethality and acute risk, outlines the 'Suicidal Mode' via flowcharts, and includes forms for post-suicide watch reporting and progress notes.
DOJ-OGR-00023198.tif
This document analyzes the circumstances surrounding a breakfast meeting between Acosta and Epstein's defense counsel, Jay Lefkowitz, on October 12, 2007, and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed on September 24, 2007. OPR concludes that Acosta did not make significant concessions during the breakfast meeting, as the key provisions of the NPA, including Epstein's 18-month sentence and sexual offender registration, were established prior to the meeting and not materially altered thereafter. The document also references a Miami Herald article critical of Acosta's involvement.
DOJ-OGR-00023147.tif
This document details the internal review and communications surrounding the resolution of the Epstein case, particularly focusing on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights disagreements and varying interpretations among legal officials regarding Epstein's claims, the validity of the NPA, and the scope of federal involvement, including a reaction from Villafaña to the proposed 90-day jail term and Deputy Attorney General Filip's perspective on Epstein's arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00023138.tif
This document details efforts by Acosta to revise the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with language concerning monetary damages for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, which was ultimately rejected by the defense. It highlights disagreements and frustrations between prosecutors and defense counsel regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Section 2255 provision, particularly concerning victim notification and Epstein's alleged delays in his guilty plea.
DOJ-OGR-00023131.tif
This document details communications and events surrounding a legal agreement, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights disagreements over gag order provisions, the selection of a special master, and concerns raised by USAO representative Villafaña regarding the selection of a private attorney and defense attacks. The document mentions the signing of an NPA addendum by Epstein and his attorneys on October 29, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023120.tif
This document details communications and events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's potential plea deal and sex offender registration in September 2007. It highlights objections from Sanchez and Lefkowitz to the registration requirement, citing a 'misunderstanding' at a prior meeting where prosecutors Krischer and Belohlavek initially stated the offense was not registrable. The document shows efforts by Epstein's defense to avoid registration and secure an 18-month federal camp sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00023090.tif
This document details discussions and drafts surrounding a non-prosecution agreement for Epstein, focusing on victim compensation and the requirement for Epstein to register as a sex offender. It mentions key individuals like Acosta, Menchel, and Villafaña, and highlights changes made to Villafaña's initial draft before presentation to defense counsel. The text also references relevant legal statutes concerning civil remedies for victims of certain crimes and a memorandum from Acting Deputy Attorney General Craig S. Morford.
DOJ-OGR-00023253.tif
This document details events from December 2007 concerning victim notification letters related to Jeffrey Epstein's case. Villafaña prepared letters for victims but was instructed by Sloman to hold them after the USAO, via Sanchez, requested a delay due to Epstein's upcoming plea hearing and concerns about potential impeachment of victims for monetary compensation. The document also highlights an FBI agent's concern about unnotified victims and the defense's involvement in drafting letters, as well as Villafaña's later contact with an attorney representing a victim known as Jane Doe #2.
DOJ-OGR-00021441.jpg
This legal document details events from August to September 2008 concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case, focusing on victim notifications. It describes how the Federal Court ordered the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) to disclose the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to victims and their attorneys. The document also discusses the USAO sending a revised notification letter after Epstein's attorneys objected to language in a previous version.
DOJ-OGR-00021439.jpg
This legal document details the actions of government representative Villafaña in July 2008 regarding the implementation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes Villafaña's communications with Epstein's defense team, including Goldberger and Sanchez, to provide an updated victim list and send notification letters to victims. The document highlights the specific legal language used to ensure victims retained their rights to pursue civil damages as if Epstein had been federally convicted.
DOJ-OGR-00021415.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice OPR report detailing the failure to notify Jeffrey Epstein's victims of his non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It describes how prosecutor Villafaña prepared notification letters on December 7, 2007, but was ordered by her superior, Sloman, to 'Hold the letter' after Sloman received a request from Epstein's defense attorney (Sanchez) to delay notification. The document highlights internal conflict, with an FBI agent and Villafaña expressing concern and disgust over the delay and defense influence.
DOJ-OGR-00021403.jpg
This legal document details a professional conflict between two government attorneys, Villafaña and Menchel, over plea negotiations in the case of Mr. Epstein. Villafaña accused Menchel, her superior, of violating victims' rights by not consulting them, while Menchel defended his discretionary authority and criticized Villafaña's actions and judgment. The document reveals that on the same day Villafaña criticized Menchel, she herself contacted the defense (Sanchez) about a potential resolution without first speaking to the victims, highlighting the complexities and differing interpretations of prosecutorial obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00021358.jpg
This legal document details a series of meetings and communications in 2007 between federal prosecutors (USAO) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding a potential prosecution. It outlines the strategic maneuvering on both sides, including the defense's presentation of legal arguments and the prosecutors' internal deliberations, led by figures like Acosta and Lourie, on charging strategy and a potential non-prosecution agreement. The document highlights key meetings in June and September 2007 where the parties exchanged information and argued their positions.
DOJ-OGR-00021356.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a chronology of meetings between the US Attorney's Office (USAO) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It includes a table listing specific dates between February 2007 and January 2008, participants from both sides (including Acosta, Dershowitz, Starr, and Black), and the purpose of each meeting, such as discussing investigation improprieties, the NPA term sheet, and state plea provisions. The text specifically notes Alex Acosta's limited attendance at pre-NPA meetings and mentions a breakfast meeting between Acosta and defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00021354.jpg
This document is part of a legal filing detailing an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into prosecutor Menchel's handling of the Epstein case. The investigation focuses on whether Menchel's prior dating relationship with defense counsel Sanchez in 2003 created a conflict of interest or improperly influenced a plea deal offered years later. The document outlines Menchel's and his supervisor Acosta's conflicting and corroborating statements regarding the decision-making process for the plea, and concludes it would have been prudent for Menchel to disclose the relationship to his supervisors.
DOJ-OGR-00021309.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal review of the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2008. It describes how Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip and prosecutor John Roth reviewed defense appeals (initiated by Ken Starr) regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), with Filip ultimately dismissing the defense's arguments as 'ludicrous' and refusing to meet with Epstein. The text also highlights prosecutor Marie Villafaña's sarcastic and angry reaction to learning that State Attorney Barry Krischer had secretly negotiated a light 90-day jail sentence for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00021301.jpg
This DOJ OPR report excerpt details the breakdown of plea negotiations in early January 2008. Epstein's defense team (Sanchez, Starr, Lefkowitz) pressed US Attorney Acosta and Sloman for a 'watered-down resolution' that involved no jail time and no sex offender registration, threatening 'ugliness in DC' regarding alleged leaks. Prosecutor Villafaña prepared contingency plans to restart the investigation, including interviewing victims in New York and abroad, while Criminal Division Chief Robert Senior conducted a full review of the evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00021300.jpg
This document outlines the negotiations between US Attorney Alexander Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (including Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz) regarding the language of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically Section 2255 concerning victim rights and monetary damages. On December 19, 2007, Acosta proposed revised language to clarify victim rights as if Epstein had been convicted federally, but the defense rejected this, arguing it was legally incongruous to fit a civil statute into a criminal plea. The document highlights the mounting frustration of the prosecution regarding what they perceived as intentional delays by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00021293.jpg
This document page describes communications and actions taken in late October 2007 related to a non-prosecution agreement. It details an email from Acosta expressing frustration with negotiations, Sloman's subsequent communication with opposing counsel Lefkowitz that led to an agreement, and the signing of an addendum by Epstein's attorneys. The document also includes an email exchange between prosecutors Villafaña and Sloman discussing the propriety of selecting a private attorney for victims versus a Special Master, and Sloman reassuring Villafaña in the face of criticism from defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00021290.jpg
This document describes the conflicting accounts surrounding a breakfast meeting between prosecutor Acosta and Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz. A letter from Lefkowitz claims Acosta promised the USAO would not interfere with Epstein's state-level plea deal, a claim Acosta's office refuted in an unsent draft letter calling it "inaccurate." The text also details Acosta's later, differing recollections of the meeting and contrasts them with media reports that a secret deal was struck at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00021288.jpg
This document details the legal wrangling in October 2007 regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights the friction between government attorneys (Villafaña, Sloman) and defense counsel (Lefkowitz, Sanchez) over the interpretation of victim compensation procedures (§ 2255) and the role of a special master. Notably, Villafaña expresses frustration with the defense's attempts to limit victim lawsuits, at one point asking her supervisor, "Can I please just indict him?"
DOJ-OGR-00021285.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal communications regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights efforts by the prosecution team (Villafaña, Acosta) to limit the disclosure of the agreement's terms, specifically regarding financial damages, to the Palm Beach Police Chief and the public. The document outlines the specific provisions of the NPA, including the guilty plea to solicitation of minors, the 30-month recommended sentence structure, and the handling of victim damages.
DOJ-OGR-00021283.jpg
This legal document details the negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein. It shows Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz, arguing against certain terms and proposing alternatives to prosecutors Acosta, Lourie, and Villafaña. The document includes a direct email from Lefkowitz to Acosta questioning the rejection of a plea deal and concludes with the defense introducing a confidentiality clause into the NPA for the first time.
Allegations of USAO Misconduct
Sanchez met with Acosta and Sloman, alleging a USAO spokesperson leaked case details and suggested a 'watered-down resolution' to avoid 'ugliness in DC'. The meeting ended when Acosta left and Sloman refused to continue without a witness.
Allegations of USAO Misconduct
Sanchez met with Acosta and Sloman, alleging a USAO spokesperson leaked case details and suggested a 'watered-down resolution' to avoid 'ugliness in DC'. The meeting ended when Acosta left and Sloman refused to continue without a witness.
Proposal to resolve disagreements over NPA interpretation
Acosta sent a letter to Sanchez proposing to resolve disagreements by replacing existing NPA language.
Addendum proposal
Acosta represented that he had proposed the addendum at the breakfast meeting.
NPA § 2255 Language
Proposal to resolve disagreements over interpretation of the NPA relating to victim restitution/rights.
Epstein matter
Letter submitted with Sloman's June 3, 2008 letter.
Clarification of damages provision
A letter from Acosta to Epstein's defense attorney Sanchez clarifying the damages provision, language from which was later used by Villafaña.
Unknown (referenced in text)
Included in submission materials.
Unknown
Advising of Jan 4 plea hearing and requesting USAO 'hold off' sending victim letters.
Epstein plea hearing and victim notification
Sanchez advised Sloman of Epstein's plea hearing date (Jan 4, 2008) and requested the USAO 'hold off' sending victim notification letters until further discussion.
Attorney representative's role
Asked Sloman to help resolve issues regarding the attorney representative's role.
Epstein case resolution not reasonable
Sanchez wrote again stating the resolution in the Epstein case was not reasonable, calling it a misunderstanding. She stated Epstein's attorneys emphasized an 18-month federal camp goal, and a registrable offense precluded a camp designation, which was inconsistent with Epstein's safety concerns. She concluded that imposing a 'life sentence' (registration) is not something to be proud of and asked for reconsideration.
Epstein's plea and registration requirement
Sanchez sent a series of emails to Lourie, strongly objecting to the sexual offender registration requirement for Epstein, claiming it was based on a miscommunication.
Details from press report, request to call Menchel
Sanchez provided details from a press report about a Florida public official who pled guilty to child sex abuse charges and was sentenced to probation. She noted she spoke to Matt Menchel and asked Lourie to call her.
Objection to registration requirement
Sanchez sent a lengthy email strongly objecting to the registration requirement for Epstein, claiming a 'miscommunication' at the September 12, 2007 meeting where Krischer and Belohlavek confirmed solicitation with minors was NOT registrable. She argued against registration due to lack of prior record, no danger of recidivism, ease of tracking, and difficulty complying with state requirements.
Lefcourt's phone number
Sanchez sent Lefcourt's phone number to Lourie.
Finalizing plea deal
Sanchez emailed Sloman stating a desire to finalize the plea deal, claiming only one issue was outstanding.
Finalizing plea deal
Sanchez advised Sloman that he wanted to finalize the plea deal, noting one outstanding issue and believing that Alex had not read all defense submissions.
Request for stay of litigation
Sanchez reached out to Lourie and obtained his agreement for a joint request to stay litigation until after Acosta's meeting with defense counsel.
Joint Request for Stay
Obtained agreement to a joint request for a stay until after Acosta's meeting.
Plea proposal for Jeffrey Epstein
Sanchez, on behalf of Epstein's defense team, sent a letter proposing a sentence of two years home confinement, restitution, and other conditions, arguing it would vindicate the federal interest without requiring a state prison sentence.
Request for extension
Sanchez emailed Villafaña requesting a two-week extension for the production of computer equipment, hoping for a 'state-based resolution'.
Submitting additional material and reaching a state-based...
A few days after the June 26, 2007 meeting, Sanchez emailed Villafaña advising that Epstein's defense team would submit material by July 11, 2007, and hoped to reach a state-based resolution. The email also requested a two-week extension for compliance with demands for records.
Request for meeting
Sanchez bypassed Villafaña and phoned Lourie to press for a meeting, which Lourie agreed to.
Breakfast meeting and Addendum proposal
Acosta stated he had “sua sponte proposed the Addendum to Mr. Lefkowitz at an October meeting in Palm Beach.”
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity