| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 CR. 490). Judge Richard M. Berman orders that government submissions related to a July 22, 2025 order be delivered directly to chambers (500 Pearl Street) in a sealed envelope marked for 'Grady MacPhee' and emailed to a specific court email address. The document is dated July 25, 2025.
This document is a Court Order dated July 22, 2025, from the Southern District of New York in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman addresses a motion filed by the Government to unseal grand jury transcripts. The Judge declines to rule immediately, instead ordering the Government to provide a memorandum of law justifying the disclosure based on specific legal factors, and to submit the transcripts and proposed redactions for review. The order notes a DOJ/FBI memo stating Epstein harmed over 1,000 victims and sets deadlines for submissions from the Government, Epstein's representatives, and victims.
This document is a 'Nolle Prosequi' filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, formally dismissing the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein due to his death on August 10, 2019. The order cites the rule of abatement as the legal basis for dismissal since Epstein died before a final judgment was issued. Judge Richard M. Berman signed the order on August 29, 2019, adding a handwritten note incorporating the transcript of an August 27 hearing and emphasizing the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
A court order from the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, dated August 26, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman orders that the hearing scheduled for the following day, August 27, 2019, at 10:30 a.m., will take place in Courtroom 110 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse at 40 Foley Square.
This document is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on August 6, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490) in the Southern District of New York. Court Reporter Kristen Carannate certifies that a transcript of a conference held on July 31, 2019, has been filed. The notice outlines the procedures and deadlines for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
A court order dated July 29, 2019, from Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr 490). The order directs counsel for both the government and the defense to meet and confer before an upcoming Wednesday conference to agree upon a schedule for discovery, motions, and trial.
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on July 24, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for Case No. 19CR490, United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. The notice informs that an official transcript of a conference held on July 15, 2019, has been filed by court reporter Kelly Surina. It outlines the procedures and deadlines for the parties involved to request redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript before it becomes publicly available.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 17, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 19 Cr. 490). It formally notifies the court that attorney Michael G. Scavelli of Steptoe & Johnson LLP is entering his appearance as counsel of record for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
This is a Notice of Appearance filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 17, 2019. Attorney James L. Brochin of the law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel of record for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in Case No. 19 Cr. 490.
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 17, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman ordered the rescheduling of a conference from 9:30 am to 11:30 am on July 18, 2019.
This document is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on July 16, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). The notice informs parties that a transcript of a conference held on July 8, 2019, has been filed by court reporter Kristen Carranante. It outlines the procedures and deadlines for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript before it becomes publicly available.
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on July 16, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 19CR490). It announces that the transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, has been filed by Court Reporter Thomas Murray and outlines the deadlines and procedures for parties to request redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, Massachusetts.
This document is an affidavit dated July 15, 2019, filed by attorney Martin G. Weinberg in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19-CR-490). Weinberg affirms his clean legal record (no felonies, censures, or pending disciplinary proceedings) in support of a motion to be admitted pro hac vice to represent Epstein in the Southern District of New York.
This document is a court order filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, granting attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion to be admitted Pro Hac Vice. This admission allows Weinberg, a Massachusetts-based attorney, to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in criminal case No. 19 Cr 490 under Judge Richard M. Berman.
This document is a motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich) requesting the court's permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that due to the high profile nature of the case and the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1)), the financial details should remain confidential to prevent them from being disseminated by the news media. The document emphasizes that the financial disclosure is intended solely for bail determination purposes.
This document is an Unsealing Order filed on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490). Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, the order grants the application made by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman (via AUSA Alex Rossmiller) to unseal the indictment against defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an Affidavit of Service dated July 28, 2025, filed in the U.S. Supreme Court case (No. 24-1073) of Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America. It certifies that Robyn Dorsey Willis of Wilson-Epes Printing Co. served three copies of Maxwell's 'Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari' to Solicitor General D. John Sauer at the Department of Justice. Electronic copies were also sent to the DOJ and David Markus (Maxwell's attorney).
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America, dated July 14, 2025. It certifies that the Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, served the 'Brief for the United States in Opposition' to Maxwell's attorneys, Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus. The document also includes administrative instructions regarding mail delays at the DOJ and contact information for case management.
This document is a Certificate of Compliance for a Petition for Writ of Certiorari submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell (Petitioner) against the United States of America. The document certifies the word count of the petition (4,956 words) and is notarized by Aza Salinder Donner in the District of Columbia on April 10, 2025.
This document is an amended application to the US Supreme Court requesting a 45-day extension for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Her new attorney, David Oscar Markus, cites his recent retention and conflicting trial schedules as reasons for the delay. The application highlights a legal question regarding a circuit split on whether plea agreements are binding on federal prosecutors across different districts.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States, indicating that on January 15, 2025, Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, David Oscar Markus, served an Application for Extension of Time to File Certiorari Petition to the Solicitor General of the United States. The document provides contact information for Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel and the address of the Department of Justice.
This document is an indictment (19 Cr. 490) filed in the SDNY charging Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors between 2002 and 2005. It details how Epstein used a network of employees and victim-recruiters to source minors for sexual abuse at his residences in New York and Palm Beach, paying them in cash. The document also includes forfeiture allegations for his property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, owned by Maple, Inc.
This document is a Protective Order designated as Exhibit L (and Exhibit 1) in Case 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, filed in May 2014. Issued by Judge Kenneth Marra, it grants a motion by Intervenors (led by Roy Black) to keep correspondence between themselves and the United States Attorney's Office confidential ('CDM'). The order establishes strict protocols for the handling, marking, and limited disclosure of these materials during the litigation between Jane Does #1-2 and the United States.
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated April 15, 2015, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a supplemental protective order. Epstein sought to keep correspondence between his lawyers and the US Government regarding his non-prosecution agreement sealed from the public. Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the public interest in determining if the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) was violated outweighs Epstein's desire for confidentiality, stating that plea negotiations are not privileged.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity