Supreme Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021142.jpg
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 36-37) from Michael Wolff's book 'Siege,' bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It details Steve Bannon's strategy to delay the Mueller investigation by urging President Trump to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and assert retroactive executive privilege. The text recounts Bannon leaking this plan to journalist Robert Costa to influence the President, Trump's subsequent interaction with Jared Kushner regarding the plan, and Trump mocking Kushner's cautious response. Note: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the visible text focuses exclusively on the Trump administration and the Russia investigation, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012145.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum authored by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing against federal prosecution of their client (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein). The text asserts that the alleged conduct—described controversially as 'consensual conduct' in a private home, even involving minors—is a matter for state (Florida/Palm Beach) jurisdiction rather than federal law. It cites various legal precedents, including United States v. Santos (2008), to argue for a narrow interpretation of federal criminal statutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012143.jpg
This document is a page from a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that federal statutes are being impermissibly stretched and requests that the case be handled by the State of Florida. In the 'Summary of Facts,' the defense claims Epstein did not personally schedule massages, that sexual activity was limited primarily to self-masturbation, and that underage women systematically lied to Epstein about their age.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012142.jpg
A legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The document characterizes Epstein as a 'successful businessman' and an 'ordinary John,' arguing that his conduct constitutes state-level prostitution offenses rather than federal crimes like sex trafficking. It asserts he did not use interstate commerce (internet/phone) to induce minors and claims the relevant conduct is time-barred under Florida state law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or article included in House Oversight Committee records (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265). It discusses the Mueller investigation, potential Supreme Court involvement, and the political implications of the November election on the President's legal and congressional standing. It features a quote from former independent prosecutor Ken Starr regarding the tendency of 'strong presidents' to win legal cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030262.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative report or book produced to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030262). It details the internal strategic analysis of Robert Mueller's Special Counsel team regarding the threat of President Trump shutting down the investigation. It discusses the potential firing of Rod Rosenstein, the recusal of the Attorney General, and the legal and political ramifications (including impeachment and obstruction of justice) if the President were to act unilaterally to end the probe. NOTE: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' this specific page contains no text regarding Jeffrey Epstein; it is focused entirely on the Mueller investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030254.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a report or article discussing the Mueller investigation's potential path through the courts. It speculates on the impact of the 'November election' on the President's legal and political fate. It explicitly quotes Ken Starr (who notably served on Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense team in 2008, though here he is cited as a former independent prosecutor) regarding the tendency of 'weak presidents' to lose legal cases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity