Second Circuit
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00016958.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge ('THE COURT') and an attorney ('MR. EVERDELL'). Mr. Everdell is advocating for a new proposed jury instruction, arguing that its 'dominant purpose' language is more accurate as it is based on Second Circuit case law from Judge Rakoff, unlike the previous instruction's language which he claims was invented by Judge Sand without basis in circuit law.
DOJ-OGR-00009224.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2014, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case, docket number 13-1388-cr, is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America, originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The page identifies the parties involved, their legal roles (Appellee, Defendants, Defendant-Appellant), and their respective legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00019851.jpg
A page from a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021, arguing against the Government's position that Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk solely based on statutory maximum penalties. The defense cites Second Circuit precedents (Friedman, Sabhnani) to establish that a potential long sentence is insufficient grounds for detention without further evidence of flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00019784.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions granted for discovery deadlines, and disputes regarding the timing of evidence disclosure. Significant attention is paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, with Judge Nathan ordering the parties to confer with Warden Heriberto Tellez regarding the defendant's concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019758.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings, including discovery deadline extensions, an affidavit from AUSA Maurene Comey, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Notably, it includes orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically ordering parties to confer regarding Warden Heriberto Tellez addressing her concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing filings between November 6, 2020, and December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan extending discovery deadlines, and specific orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, including a directive involving Warden Heriberto Tellez. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Sternheim) regarding discovery materials and detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019706.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Page 13 of 19) for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings including letters from the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding discovery deadlines, conditions of confinement at the MDC, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Key events include Judge Nathan setting new deadlines for motions and discovery, and ordering parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019647.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply Brief', submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 8, 2020. The brief is part of an appeal (Case 20-3061) from a lower court case (20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York, where the United States of America is the plaintiff against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is represented by attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based law firm HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00010179.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 22, 2022. An unnamed speaker argues that Mr. Parse's implementation of end-of-year financial transactions was a knowing and criminal act to obstruct the IRS, not a simple mistake. Another speaker, Ms. Davis, addresses the judge, referring to additional evidence submitted in a written briefing.
DOJ-OGR-00009903.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for case number 13-1388-cr. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America. The document identifies the parties involved and lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and the appellant David Parse.
DOJ-OGR-00003115.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, is a portion of a legal argument defending an indictment against a motion to dismiss. The argument asserts that using pseudonyms for minor victims and providing an approximate date range (1994-1997) for the alleged crimes is legally sound, citing precedents like Stringer, Kidd, and Stavroulakis. It further argues the defendant is not prejudiced, as the government has provided and will provide specific details, such as victim birth information and witness names, during discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00004714.jpg
This page is from a government legal filing (Document 295) in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on May 25, 2021. The text argues against the defendant's motion to dismiss charges based on a prior Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL). Citing the *Annabi* precedent, the government asserts that plea agreements are generally only binding in the specific district where they are signed, not universally across all federal districts.
DOJ-OGR-00005561.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues that the defense in a federal criminal case is improperly relying on civil case law regarding pseudonyms for plaintiffs. It asserts that the current case involves crime victims, who are entitled to statutory protections under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, unlike civil plaintiffs who are generally required to identify themselves. The document criticizes the defense for ignoring relevant precedent from high-profile sex abuse trials and for citing irrelevant civil cases.
DOJ-OGR-00020326.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated May 17, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It is a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' filed by Maxwell's attorneys, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion is an appeal of a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002749.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated March 9, 2021, arguing that the District Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Third Bail Motion because an appeal regarding her Second Bail Motion is already pending with the Second Circuit. The text details the defendant's offers to renounce French and British citizenship and sequester spousal assets to secure bail, reiterating the court's previous finding that she poses a significant flight risk.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity