Deutsche Bank
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Francis J. Kelly
|
Employment |
12
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Francis J. Kelly
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Unspecified email sender
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Parvin Moyne
|
Legal representative |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Blanche Lark Christerson
|
Affiliated author |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Debtor creditor |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Parse
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Parse
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Parse
|
Employment professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management
|
Subsidiary affiliate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
LCH
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Joseph DiPiero
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Investigative target witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Banking |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kushner family
|
Financial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY/NYAG
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Parvin
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Larry V. Adam
|
Employment |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Win/Settlement with Deutsche Bank | Legal Court/Settlement | View |
| N/A | Document creation | Deutsche Bank statements for February and March were created and marked with an "as of" date, whi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Financial transaction | Transactions were implemented by Mr. Parse at Deutsche Bank based on instructions from Jenkins & ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-02-01 | N/A | Creation and filing of bank statements discussed as evidence. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-08-03 | N/A | Deutsche Bank legal counsel contacts a government entity regarding a new subpoena from the USVI AG. | N/A | View |
| 2020-08-03 | N/A | Deutsche Bank notifies recipients of a third-party subpoena from the USVI AG regarding Jeffrey Ep... | U.S. Virgin Islands | View |
| 2020-08-03 | N/A | Deutsche Bank receives third-party subpoena from USVI AG regarding Jeffrey Epstein's estate. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | DFS settled with Deutsche Bank | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-13 | N/A | Production of documents to SDNY | New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2019-11-19 | N/A | Deutsche Bank document production submission via Citrix. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-11 | N/A | Subpoena issued to Deutsche Bank. | New York (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-11 | N/A | Grand Jury Subpoena issued to Deutsche Bank. | New York, NY | View |
| 2018-03-19 | N/A | Projected listing date for DWS on the Frankfurt exchange | Frankfurt | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Deutsche Bank fined by FCA for money laundering operations. | UK | View |
| 2014-03-12 | N/A | Deutsche Bank (DB) stopped market-making in OTC oil options. | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Onboarding of the Epstein Relationship at Deutsche Bank. | Deutsche Bank | View |
| 2008-11-01 | N/A | Trump had difficulty making payments on Deutsche Bank loan. | Chicago | View |
| 0019-05-22 | N/A | Deutsch bank ruling | N/A | View |
| 0008-07-01 | N/A | Deutsche Bank began laying off 18,000 workers across its international offices | International offices | View |
| -2020-07-07 | N/A | Deutsche Bank presentation to email recipients | Unknown | View |
EFTA00015713.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The discussion centers on a New York Times article linking Jeffrey Epstein to Deutsche Bank. One official confirms that they are already receiving documents from Deutsche Bank pursuant to a subpoena and that a review is underway. Another official mentions a 'DB AML [Deutsche Bank Anti-Money Laundering] investigation' that overlaps with the current inquiry and plans to coordinate with the 'PC team' (likely Public Corruption).
EFTA00015712.pdf
An email exchange dated July 23, 2019, discussing a New York Times article about Jeffrey Epstein moving money overseas via Deutsche Bank transactions flagged to the U.S. authorities. The sender confirms that their 'Team was already on it' and notes that 'McFadden' (likely a journalist) has discussed the matter in an interview.
EFTA00015631.pdf
An email sent on July 11, 2019, by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The sender shares a New York Times article about Jeffrey Epstein's net worth with the subject line 'Deutsche!', implying a connection to Deutsche Bank, and comments 'Did I call it or did I call it'.
EFTA00014625.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between the FBI (New York field office) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence coordinates the transfer of subpoena returns (specifically from American Express and Deutsche Bank) burned onto discs by a contractor named Hamilton. The team also schedules a conference call to discuss a 'game plan' and introduces a forensic accountant to the investigative squad.
EFTA00014613.pdf
This document is an email dated July 18, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a contractor. The attorney requests that subpoena returns related to the Epstein investigation (specifically from American Express and Deutsche Bank) be burned to a disc. The disc is intended for a Special Agent and Detective, to be handed off to 'Mandy' (likely FBI Agent Amanda Young) and 'Paul' at a conference.
EFTA00014611.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between SDNY and FBI officials regarding the Epstein investigation. An Assistant U.S. Attorney instructs a contractor named Hamilton to burn subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank onto discs for a Special Agent and Detective. The chain also discusses the addition of a forensic accountant to the investigative squad and plans for a strategy meeting.
EFTA00014608.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between a contractor named Hamilton and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the preparation of evidence discs containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank related to the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' investigation. The discs were to be delivered to a Special Agent and a Detective, potentially for hand-off at a conference.
EFTA00010287.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated October 2, 2020, detailing a production of discovery materials. The production includes financial records from Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, and UBS related to Maxwell, Epstein, and various associated entities like the Terramar Project and Max Foundation. It also provides technical instructions for viewing specific file types (.dat, .vol, video files) included in the production.
EFTA00009962.pdf
This document is an email chain initiated by Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Davis O'Brien on September 8, 2019, inquiring about Jeffrey Epstein's Virgin Islands-based charity 'Gratitude America.' The reporter highlights a $10 million grant from Leon Black's foundation, missing donations, and a Deutsche Bank account held by the charity. The emails discuss SDNY's scrutiny of Epstein's banking relationships and potential expansion of the investigation into financial crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00001702.jpg
This document is a Memorandum Opinion & Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Judge Alison J. Nathan addresses a dispute over a protective order, ultimately adopting the Government's proposed version over Maxwell's requests to publicly reference alleged victims and restrict Government witnesses' use of discovery materials. The document cites legal standards for protective orders under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1).
DOJ-OGR-00000848.jpg
This document is a docket sheet page from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from July 27 to July 30, 2020. It details a dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order siding with the Government, restricting Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims and witnesses to protect their privacy during the criminal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020633.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details filings from July 2020, specifically focusing on a dispute over a protective order wherein Maxwell sought to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to protect the privacy and safety of victims and witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing a Memorandum Opinion & Order dated July 30, 2020. The order resolves disputes regarding a protective order, siding with the Government to restrict Ms. Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims not identified in the litigation and rejecting her request to restrict potential witnesses' use of discovery materials. The court emphasizes the need to balance privacy interests of victims and witnesses against the defendant's rights and public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00019273.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket for Case 20-3061, detailing filings between July 28 and July 30, 2020, involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes an affidavit by Alex Rossmiller, correspondence regarding a protective order, and a detailed Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan establishing the terms of that protective order. The order addresses disputes over Ms. Maxwell's ability to publicly reference alleged victims and restrictions on the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00019255.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from late July 2020. It includes an affidavit filing, correspondence regarding a protective order, the order itself, and a lengthy Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's terms regarding public references to victims/witnesses and the use of discovery materials. The court ruled in favor of the Government's proposed language, prioritizing the privacy of alleged victims and witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00019804.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late July 2020 detailing filings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records a dispute regarding a protective order, where the defense sought to allow Maxwell to publicly name victims who had already spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict Maxwell from disseminating the identities of alleged victims or witnesses to protect their privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00019780.jpg
This is a court docket log from the Ghislaine Maxwell case covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the dispute and subsequent ruling on a Protective Order where Maxwell sought to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken to the media about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict the public identification of victims and witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.
DOJ-OGR-00019754.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) criminal proceedings, specifically covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the legal arguments and subsequent court order regarding a 'Protective Order' governing confidential materials. Judge Alison Nathan ruled against Maxwell's request to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly, citing a need to protect witness privacy and the integrity of the criminal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00010212.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a sentencing memorandum in the case United States v. Parse (Case 1:09-cr-00581), filed in 2013 and later referenced in a 2022 filing. It discusses the fraudulent backdating of transactions at Deutsche Bank to achieve tax shelters, specifically refuting David Parse's attempt to blame his subordinate, Carrie Yackee, for the misconduct. The text includes transcript excerpts where Yackee testifies she simply followed her boss's orders, assuming they complied with bank policy.
DOJ-OGR-00010207.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from March 18, 2013, argues for a significant prison sentence for an individual named Parse. It details his central role as a Deutsche Bank representative in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving multiple co-conspirators and fraudulent tax shelters, which generated over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and caused over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document highlights that Parse earned over $3 million in commissions for his indispensable role in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00010193.jpg
This legal document, a letter from Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues on behalf of a client named David. It contends that while David was convicted for 'backdating' transactions, the jury's acquittal on more serious tax evasion and conspiracy charges suggests they believed he was unaware of the illegality of the Jenkins tax shelter scheme itself. The letter posits that David was given comfort by the participation of major entities like Deutsche Bank and believed he was exploiting a legal 'loophole'.
DOJ-OGR-00010192.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing, likely a sentencing memorandum, dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. It presents character evidence for a defendant named 'David' (or 'Dave'), citing letters from friends (James Yetter, Andrew Miller, Thomas Carnaghi, Kenneth Norwick) who describe his selfless and extensive support during their personal family crises. The document contrasts this positive character with the 'Instant Offense,' which involved a relationship David had with Paul Daugerdas starting in 1998, and mentions related activities by broker Jason Shih in the early 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00010187.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing, likely a sentencing memorandum, addressed to Judge William H. Pauley, III. It outlines the personal and professional history of a man named David, detailing his education at the University of Michigan, his strong friendships from college, and his successful career progression through several prominent financial firms, including Touche Ross, Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and Alex Brown & Sons, from his graduation until his indictment in 2009. The document uses letters from friends to portray him as a loyal friend and generous person.
DOJ-OGR-00010179.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 22, 2022. An unnamed speaker argues that Mr. Parse's implementation of end-of-year financial transactions was a knowing and criminal act to obstruct the IRS, not a simple mistake. Another speaker, Ms. Davis, addresses the judge, referring to additional evidence submitted in a written briefing.
DOJ-OGR-00010178.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the content appears to stem from a separate tax fraud case involving Deutsche Bank (likely U.S. v. Daugerdas/Parse). The text details a closing argument or legal submission regarding 'tax shelter transactions' designed to defraud the IRS, specifically highlighting the roles of Deutsche Bank employees Mr. Parse and Carrie Yackee, and referencing testimony from Paul Daugerdas' secretary. The argument asserts that Parse and Yackee were the only ones at Deutsche Bank who knew the 'full picture' of the fraud.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Deutsche Bank | Donald Trump | $0.00 | Reference to money Trump 'owed' to Deutsche Bank. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jenkins | Deutsche Bank | $0.00 | Transactions implemented by Mr. Parse pursuant ... | View |
| N/A | Received | DANSKE BANK A/S | Deutsche Bank | $1,000,000,000.00 | Hypothetical laundering of gold bullion. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Deutsche Bank | Plaintiffs (implied) | $0.00 | Settlement figure mentioned regarding the 'win ... | View |
| 2019-07-09 | Received | Financial Trust C... | Deutsche Bank | $0.00 | Deutsche Bank alleged to control several billio... | View |
| 2019-07-06 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Deutsche Bank | $0.00 | Epstein trading currencies through Deutsche Ban... | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Paid | Deutsche Bank | SDNY/FBI | $0.00 | Subpoena Returns (Financial documents) | View |
| 2018-03-01 | Received | Public Investors | Deutsche Bank | $2,470,000,000.00 | Expected IPO raise for 25% of DWS shares ($1.85... | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Received | Russian entities | Deutsche Bank | $10,000,000,000.00 | Alleged money laundering operation mentioned in... | View |
| 2013-09-12 | Received | J.P. Morgan | Deutsche Bank | $0.00 | Transfer of assets from J.P. Morgan to Deutsche... | View |
| 2013-01-01 | Received | AllianceBernstein... | Deutsche Bank | $0.00 | Transfer of Jeffrey Epstein's assets. | View |
| 2008-11-01 | Received | Donald Trump | Deutsche Bank | $40,000,000.00 | Personal guarantee on the larger loan. | View |
| 2008-11-01 | Paid | Deutsche Bank | Trump | $640,000,000.00 | Loan for Trump Tower Chicago. | View |
| 2008-11-01 | Paid | Deutsche Bank | Donald Trump | $640,000,000.00 | Loan to finance construction of Trump Tower in ... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity