| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Dahmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defense expert |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Opposing experts |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant expert witness |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Dahmer Insanity Trial | N/A (Historically Milwaukee... | View |
| 2021-11-04 | Court ruling | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memo Endorsement denying the Government's request regarding witne... | Court | View |
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Attorney Nicole Simmons submits Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow for government redaction proposals.
This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.
This document is an email from Nicole Simmons (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.) to Judge Nathan's chambers in the U.S. v. Maxwell case, dated November 13, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for filing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The filing was submitted under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions by the government.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell trial (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons forwards a response to the government's motion to preclude the testimony of expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus to Judge Nathan's chambers. The documents were submitted under temporary seal to allow the government to review for necessary redactions.
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 22, 2021. It lists several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including directives regarding the sealing and redaction of opinions, the denial of motions to quash a subpoena related to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and memorandum opinions precluding the expert testimony of Bennett Gershman and Dr. Ryan Hall.
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and rulings from early November 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on motions to exclude witnesses, a denial of a motion regarding juror name disclosure, and an order compelling the government to clarify its position on the legal status of an alleged victim. The document outlines the ongoing legal arguments and procedural matters in the lead-up to Maxwell's trial.
This document is a log of court filings and orders from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between November 3 and November 8, 2021. The entries detail procedural matters ahead of her trial, including Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders on motions for reconsideration, jury selection logistics, and deadlines for witness-related briefings. The filings also concern motions to exclude evidence related to an alleged victim and the government's response to defense motions.
This document appears to be a page from a book or article stamped with a House Oversight control number. The text discusses the motivations of cannibalistic serial killers, specifically focusing on Jeffrey Dahmer. It quotes an Associated Press dispatch regarding Dahmer's insanity trial and the testimony of Dr. Park Dietz, concluding with a dark satirical comment comparing safe sex practices to Dahmer's behavior. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein in the text of this specific page.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity