DOJ-OGR-00020441.jpg
1.39 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
7
Events
4
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.39 MB
Summary
This document is a log of court filings and orders from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between November 3 and November 8, 2021. The entries detail procedural matters ahead of her trial, including Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders on motions for reconsideration, jury selection logistics, and deadlines for witness-related briefings. The filings also concern motions to exclude evidence related to an alleged victim and the government's response to defense motions.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of multiple court orders, letters, and motions filed in her case.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Signed orders, received letters, and made rulings (endorsements) in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA |
Co-author of letters and motions from the USA (prosecution) to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA |
Co-author of letters and motions from the USA (prosecution) to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA |
Co-author of letters and motions from the USA (prosecution) to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Dr. Park Dietz | Anticipated Witness |
Mentioned in a Memo Endorsement where the Court denies the Government's request concerning him.
|
| Dr. Elizabeth Loftus | Anticipated Witness |
Mentioned in a Memo Endorsement where the Court denies the Government's request concerning her.
|
| Minor Victim-3 | Alleged Victim |
Subject of a defense motion to exclude evidence and a court order regarding the Government's supplemental letter.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Government agency |
Issues orders, receives motions, and makes rulings in the case.
|
| The Government | Government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, ordered to respond to motions and submit briefings.
|
| USA | Government agency |
The party filing letters and motions, representing the prosecution.
|
Timeline (7 events)
2021-11-03
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order regarding the defendant's motions for reconsideration, setting deadlines for the Government's response and clarifying procedures for jury selection (voir dire) and peremptory strikes.
Court
2021-11-04
The USA filed a letter regarding the RTC and Verdict Sheet.
Court
2021-11-04
The USA filed a letter motion for reconsideration of Court Order Dkt. 409.
Court
2021-11-04
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memo Endorsement denying the Government's request regarding witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, but granting it for other witnesses, and set new briefing deadlines.
Court
2021-11-04
The USA filed a letter replying to the Defendant's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names.
Court
2021-11-05
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memo Endorsement denying the defendant's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 407) regarding the disclosure of juror names.
Court
2021-11-08
The Court issued an order regarding the Government's supplemental letter about its opposition to a defense motion to exclude evidence related to 'Minor Victim-3'.
Court
Relationships (4)
Judge Nathan is presiding over the case of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, issuing orders and ruling on motions related to her trial.
AUSA Alison Moe, along with her colleagues, submitted letters and motions to Judge Nathan on behalf of the US Government.
AUSA Lara Pomerantz, along with her colleagues, submitted letters and motions to Judge Nathan on behalf of the US Government.
AUSA Andrew Rohrbach, along with his colleagues, submitted letters and motions to Judge Nathan on behalf of the US Government.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,734 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page55 of 91
11/03/2021 413 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motions for reconsideration. See Dkt. Nos. 407, 408. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 408, on or before November 8, 2021. As to the motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names, the Court reminds counsel of the following. First, as the Court previously indicated, the lawyers will be provided the names of jurors on November 16, prior to the commencement of the voir dire process. Second, the Court has now resolved the logistical issues regarding the ability to conduct peremptory challenges on November 29 and the Court can now confirm that peremptory strikes will not be exercised until November 29. Finally, as previously indicated, although only 40 qualified jurors are needed for the exercise of peremptory strikes, the Court will seek to qualify approximately 50 to 60 prospective jurors to return on November 29 for the exercise of peremptory strikes. If counsel for either side learns of any additional information that would be a basis for a strike for cause prior to November 29, they shall immediately raise the issue with the Court. Bearing in mind this information, the Government is ORDERED to respond to Defendant's motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, on or before November 4, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/3/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021 410 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 3, 2021 re: RTC and Verdict Sheet Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Request to Charge, # 2 Exhibit Verdict sheet)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021 411 LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409) . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021 414 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 411 LETTER MOTION filed by USA addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409). ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby DENIES the Government's request as to Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Pursuant to this Court's Order, if the Government seeks to exclude these anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 8, 2021. Dkt. No. 409. As to the remaining individuals disclosed in Defendant's notice, the Court GRANTS the Government's request. If the Government seeks to exclude those anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 15, 2021, with a response by Defendant due November 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/4/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021 415 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/05/2021 416 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 415 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated in the Government's letter, the motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/5/2021)(ap) (Entered: 11/05/2021)
11/08/2021 417 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's supplemental letter regarding its opposition to the defense motion to exclude evidence of Minor Victim-3. See Dkt. No. 387. The letter is submitted temporarily under seal to allow defense counsel the opportunity to propose any additional redactions beyond what the Government proposes. At the November 1, 2021 conference, the Court asked the Government to provide its position as to whether Alleged "Victim-3" could be considered a "victim" of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). See Transcript at 71-72. The Government's supplemental letter does not address this issue. While acknowledging that the Court's request may have been unclear, the Government is now
DOJ-OGR-00020441
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document