This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and rulings from early November 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on motions to exclude witnesses, a denial of a motion regarding juror name disclosure, and an order compelling the government to clarify its position on the legal status of an alleged victim. The document outlines the ongoing legal arguments and procedural matters in the lead-up to Maxwell's trial.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of multiple letters and motions, and signer of endorsements and orders in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Listed as a sender on multiple letters from the USA to Judge Nathan, and filer of documents.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Listed as a sender on multiple letters from the USA to Judge Nathan.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Listed as a sender on multiple letters from the USA to Judge Nathan, and filer of documents.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of all the listed court filings, endorsements, and orders.
|
| Dr. Park Dietz | Anticipated witness |
Mentioned in a Memo Endorsement where the Government's request to exclude him as a witness was denied.
|
| Dr. Elizabeth Loftus | Anticipated witness |
Mentioned in a Memo Endorsement where the Government's request to exclude her as a witness was denied.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Listed as a sender on a letter from the USA to Judge Nathan dated November 8, 2021.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Counsel for Defendant (implied) |
Sender of a letter on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the court (SDNY) handling the case.
|
"The Court hereby DENIES the Government's request as to Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus."Source
"As to the remaining individuals disclosed in Defendant's notice, the Court GRANTS the Government's request."Source
"For the reasons stated in the Government's letter, the motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, is DENIED. SO ORDERED."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,183 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document