DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg

1.22 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
5
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.22 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and rulings from early November 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on motions to exclude witnesses, a denial of a motion regarding juror name disclosure, and an order compelling the government to clarify its position on the legal status of an alleged victim. The document outlines the ongoing legal arguments and procedural matters in the lead-up to Maxwell's trial.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of multiple letters and motions, and signer of endorsements and orders in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney)
Listed as a sender on multiple letters from the USA to Judge Nathan, and filer of documents.
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney)
Listed as a sender on multiple letters from the USA to Judge Nathan.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney)
Listed as a sender on multiple letters from the USA to Judge Nathan, and filer of documents.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
The subject of all the listed court filings, endorsements, and orders.
Dr. Park Dietz Anticipated witness
Mentioned in a Memo Endorsement where the Government's request to exclude him as a witness was denied.
Dr. Elizabeth Loftus Anticipated witness
Mentioned in a Memo Endorsement where the Government's request to exclude her as a witness was denied.
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney)
Listed as a sender on a letter from the USA to Judge Nathan dated November 8, 2021.
Bobbi C. Sternheim Counsel for Defendant (implied)
Sender of a letter on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
USA government agency
The prosecuting party in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filing multiple letters and motions.
SDNY government agency
Southern District of New York, the court where the case is being heard, mentioned in the header 'SDNY CM/ECF NextGen ...

Timeline (5 events)

2021-11-01
A conference where the Court asked the Government to provide its position on whether 'Alleged Victim-3' could be considered a victim for legal purposes.
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Government counsel Defense counsel
2021-11-04
The USA filed a letter motion for reconsideration of a court order regarding witnesses.
SDNY Court
2021-11-04
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a memo endorsement denying the government's request to exclude witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, but granting the request for other undisclosed individuals.
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
2021-11-05
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a memo endorsement denying the defendant's motion for reconsideration regarding the disclosure of juror names.
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan
2021-11-08
Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order compelling the government to file a supplemental letter clarifying its position on whether an anticipated witness ('Victim-3') could be deemed a victim for legal purposes like restitution.
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location of the court (SDNY) handling the case.

Relationships (5)

Ghislaine Maxwell professional Judge Alison J. Nathan
The document shows Judge Nathan presiding over the case of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, issuing orders and rulings related to her trial.
Ghislaine Maxwell adversarial Alison Moe
Alison Moe is an AUSA, part of the prosecution team (USA) bringing the case against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell adversarial Lara Pomerantz
Lara Pomerantz is an AUSA, part of the prosecution team (USA) bringing the case against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell adversarial Andrew Rohrbach
Andrew Rohrbach is an AUSA, part of the prosecution team (USA) bringing the case against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell professional Bobbi C. Sternheim
Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a letter on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating she is part of Maxwell's legal defense team.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court hereby DENIES the Government's request as to Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus."
Source
— Judge Alison J. Nathan (From a Memo Endorsement dated 11/04/2021 regarding the exclusion of anticipated witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg
Quote #1
"As to the remaining individuals disclosed in Defendant's notice, the Court GRANTS the Government's request."
Source
— Judge Alison J. Nathan (From a Memo Endorsement dated 11/04/2021 regarding the exclusion of anticipated witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg
Quote #2
"For the reasons stated in the Government's letter, the motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, is DENIED. SO ORDERED."
Source
— Judge Alison J. Nathan (From a Memo Endorsement dated 11/05/2021 regarding the disclosure of juror names.)
DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,183 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page66 of 208
A-62
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
RTC and Verdict Sheet Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Request to Charge, # 2 Exhibit Verdict sheet)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021
411
LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409). Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021
414
MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 411 LETTER MOTION filed by USA addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reconsideration of Court Order (Dkt. 409). ENDORSEMENT: The Court hereby DENIES the Government's request as to Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Pursuant to this Court's Order, if the Government seeks to exclude these anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 8, 2021. Dkt. No. 409. As to the remaining individuals disclosed in Defendant's notice, the Court GRANTS the Government's request. If the Government seeks to exclude those anticipated witnesses, briefing must be submitted by November 15, 2021, with a response by Defendant due November 19, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/4/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/04/2021
415
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/04/2021)
11/05/2021
416
MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 415 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 4, 2021 re: Reply to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration regarding Disclosure of Juror Names. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated in the Government's letter, the motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 407, is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/5/2021)(ap) (Entered: 11/05/2021)
11/08/2021
417
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's supplemental letter regarding its opposition to the defense motion to exclude evidence of Minor Victim-3. See Dkt. No. 387. The letter is submitted temporarily under seal to allow defense counsel the opportunity to propose any additional redactions beyond what the Government proposes. At the November 1, 2021 conference, the Court asked the Government to provide its position as to whether Alleged "Victim-3" could be considered a "victim" of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). See Transcript at 71-72. The Government's supplemental letter does not address this issue. While acknowledging that the Court's request may have been unclear, the Government is now ORDERED to file a supplemental letter responsive to the Court's question on or before 12:00 p.m. on November 7, 2021. For the sake of clarity, the Government is directed to state its position as to whether this anticipated witness could be deemed a victim of any of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/6/2021)(lnl) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021
418
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 8, 2021 re: Dkt. No. 406 Ex. A Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021
419
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 11/8/2021 re: Suggestions to Dkt 404 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 62/113
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
DOJ-OGR-00020684

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document