District of Columbia
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00010594.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by the defense team (Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues that specific individuals—Maria Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant—do not qualify as 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) relative to the counts of conviction. The defense contends that because the federal charges specifically required the involvement of minors, and these women were either not minors or their interactions fell outside the indictment timeline, they are not statutory victims entitled to CVRA rights in this specific legal context.
DOJ-OGR-00010144.jpg
This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, filed as part of a court case. It details his public lectures, participation in PBS series on ethics and the Constitution, and extensive legal and public service activities. Key activities include holding leadership and member roles in various American Bar Association commissions and being retained by the New Jersey Supreme Court to analyze lawyer disciplinary systems.
DOJ-OGR-00002954.jpg
This document is page 'xix' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities listing various United States court cases, from Nitsche to Quinones, along with their legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1974 to 2018 and originate from several federal courts, including district courts, circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court.
DOJ-OGR-00005271.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, argues against a defendant's request to seal the juror questionnaire and voir dire process from the public. Citing multiple legal precedents, the filing asserts that there is a strong presumption of openness and the defense has failed to meet the 'heavy burden' of proof required to justify such secrecy. The document urges the court to deny the defendant's request and order the materials to be filed on the public docket.
DOJ-OGR-00008728.jpg
This document is page 22 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 15 regarding 'Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' specifically defining the 'First Element' and the legal definition of acting 'Knowingly.' It outlines the burden of proof on the government to establish that Maxwell persuaded or coerced individuals to travel in interstate commerce.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019426.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report excerpt bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019426). It details the technical challenges, anticipated glitches, and testing issues surrounding the rollout of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) health insurance exchanges in various states (CA, OR, NV, DC) and at the federal level. Despite the user prompt, the document contains absolutely no text related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates; it is entirely focused on healthcare policy implementation circa 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017845.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement (legal opinion) regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11 attacks. It discusses motions to dismiss filed by Saudi defendants, specifically Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, as well as the National Commercial Bank, in cases alleging they provided material support to al Qaeda. The text details procedural history involving the transfer of cases between the District of Columbia and the Southern District of New York, and mentions a $4.5 billion claim by insurance companies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017649.jpg
This document is page 14 of a 78-page excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 1 and Rule 11) to align with the CVRA, quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl on the Act's intent to reform the legal culture surrounding victims' rights. The document bears a footer for attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (where the CVRA was a central legal issue).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017142.jpg
This document appears to be page 55 of a manuscript or memoir draft by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It recounts his experiences as a law clerk in 1962-1963, specifically detailing a case involving a fraudulent lawyer named Morgan and Dershowitz's admiration for the appellate attorney Monroe Freedman. The text highlights a lesson Dershowitz learned from Judge Bazelon regarding the necessity of a solid legal basis for reversing convictions, ending with a parenthetical reference to Bush v. Gore.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017134.jpg
This document is a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely Alan Dershowitz's, given the specific biography of clerking for Bazelon and Goldberg). It details the narrator's time at Yale Law School, conflicts with professors due to his 'chutzpah,' and his subsequent clerkships with Judge David Bazelon and Justice Arthur Goldberg in Washington, D.C., between 1962 and 1964. The text mentions historical events such as the Cuban Missile Crisis and MLK's 'I have a dream' speech.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023373.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (printed via Westlaw in 2019) regarding the consolidated multi-district litigation (MDL 1570) surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It outlines the plaintiffs' claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act against banks, charities, and states accused of funding al-Qaeda, and details the procedural history including the transfer of cases to the Southern District of New York and the succession of judges presiding over the matter. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp but does not explicitly name Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing, marked with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368. It lists various legal precedents and case citations, primarily focusing on litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sovereign immunity, and international liability (Alien Tort Statute). While the document is part of a collection likely reviewed by the House Oversight Committee (possibly related to an investigation involving Epstein or similar legal themes of jurisdiction/immunity), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023106.jpg
This document is page 5 of an interview (likely from The Litigation Daily) with high-profile defense attorney Reid Weingarten, dated September 8, 2015. Weingarten discusses his defense of Mike Espy, his close personal friendship with former AG Eric Holder, and their joint work establishing the 'See Forever Foundation' to assist juvenile offenders. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was included in materials produced to Congress, likely relevant due to Weingarten's role as Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney during the 2008 plea deal negotiations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
This document is page 2 of 5 from an interview with white-collar defense attorney Reid Weingarten. He discusses his criteria for accepting or declining clients, the issue of conflicts of interest in law firms, and his assessment of various federal prosecutor offices, specifically highlighting the Southern District of New York as the most formidable.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024501.jpg
This document is page 68 of a business report (likely for K12 Inc.) analyzing the For-Profit K-12 Education market between 2004 and 2010. It cites Harris Nesbitt Research to project revenue growth in the sector and discusses market drivers such as the No Child Left Behind Act, the rise of charter schools, and the increasing demand for virtual academies. The text explicitly mentions the 'large and scalable platform that exists at k12' as being positioned to capitalize on these trends.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024499.jpg
This document, page 66 of a House Oversight file, is a business analysis of the 'Competitive Landscape within Early Childhood Education.' It details the market position of 'KLC OpCo' relative to major competitors like ABC Learning, Bright Horizons, and La Petite Academy, including financial metrics (sales/EBITDA) and operational data (number of centers/students) as of late 2005/early 2006. The document highlights market fragmentation, with Family Day Care Providers holding 60% of the market share.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015081.jpg
This page appears to be a narrative manuscript or book excerpt stamped by the House Oversight Committee (Bates: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015081). The text discusses the political dynamics between JFK and LBJ during the 1960 election and Jackie Kennedy's disdain for Johnson. It also details JFK's extramarital affairs, mentioning a Secret Service agent code-named 'Dentist' who facilitated trysts, and a specific incident involving a Dallas beauty queen that was altered when Jackie decided to join the trip. Although the prompt identifies this as an 'Epstein-related document,' there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates on this specific page; the content is strictly historical regarding the Kennedy administration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024700.jpg
This document is page 64 of a 'Cannabis Investment Report' dated December 2017, authored by Ackrell Capital. It provides a detailed overview of Medical Cannabis Laws in the United States, discussing the history of legalization starting with California in 1996, the legal distinction between 'prescribing' and 'recommending' under the CSA, qualifying medical conditions (listing over 50), and state-specific restrictions such as Pennsylvania's 2016 law. The document contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024700', indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely within a larger tranche of financial or investment records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024574.jpg
This document page (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024574) is an excerpt from a financial offering memorandum detailing the U.S. federal income tax considerations for investing in an entity identified as 'KUE.' It defines 'U.S. Person' for tax purposes and asserts KUE's belief that it functions as a partnership, meaning it incurs no federal income tax liability itself, though it notes that legal counsel has not rendered a formal opinion on these tax consequences. The text also outlines 'anti-inversion legislation' regarding non-U.S. corporations treated as U.S. corporations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024546.jpg
This document is a financial summary and projection for an organization identified as 'k12' (likely K12 Inc.), covering fiscal years 2002 through projected 2007. It details revenue growth from $6.7 million in 2002 to a projected $132.2 million in 2007, driven by expansion into new states and grades, though the company operated at a net loss for the recorded historical years (2002-2005). The text outlines the company's operational history, expansion into specific states (CO, PA, OH, ID, CA, AR, MN, AZ, FL, WI, DC, TX, WY, WA), future opportunities in Chicago and Sacramento, and its revenue recognition policies regarding virtual charter school management.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024541.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an investment report or business overview regarding 'k12' (K12 Inc.), a virtual education company. It details the company's business model, profitability (noting higher margins due to lack of physical infrastructure), and presence in various US states during the 2006 fiscal year. The document highlights financial projections, specifically a revenue increase in district-managed programs from $3 million in 2006 to a projected $11 million in 2008, and references a 2001 KPMG study validating their curriculum quality.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024916.jpg
This document appears to be page 100 of a financial research report produced by Cowen Collaborative Insights, dated February 25, 2019. It details valuation methodologies and investment risks specifically related to the U.S. and Canadian cannabis industries. The page bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents, likely related to financial investigations, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024779.jpg
This document is page 143 from a 2018 Ackrell Capital report titled 'Top 100 Private Cannabis Companies.' It profiles four specific companies: CannaCraft, CannaKorp, Colorado Harvest Company, and Columbia Care, detailing their locations, websites, and business models. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024779' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence during a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to financial probes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024732.jpg
This document is page 96 of a Cannabis Investment Report published by Ackrell Capital in December 2017. It details legal developments regarding cannabis legalization and medical use in the United States and Canada, referencing specific legislation like the CSA and CDSA. The document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024732' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely as part of a larger financial or investment portfolio review, though the text itself contains no direct references to Epstein or his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity