T.M. Griffith

Person
Mentions
10
Relationships
5
Events
2
Documents
5
Also known as:
T.M.

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
5 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victimizer victim
5
1
View
person Bradley Edwards
Client
5
1
View
person MR. EPSTEIN
Perpetrator victim
5
1
View
person James Eisenberg
Client
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Conflict of interest
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Interview The Affiant hand-delivered a letter to T.M. at the time she was interviewed. N/A View
2008-01-10 Communication Letters were sent from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist to victims C.W. and T.M. N/A View

018.pdf

This document is a Motion for Stay filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in a civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe. They argue that a stay is mandatory under federal law because of a pending federal criminal investigation/action (the deferred prosecution agreement). Attached is a declaration from AUSA A. Marie Villafana detailing the government's interaction with victims (T.M., C.W., S.R.) and providing copies of notification letters sent to them and their attorneys regarding their rights and the non-prosecution agreement.

Legal motion for stay (civil case) with attached declaration and exhibits (us attorney letters)
2025-12-26

DOJ-OGR-00004701.jpg

This legal document, filed in 2021, describes events in September and October 2007 surrounding a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It details that victims were not consulted before the agreement, which deferred prosecution to Florida, and outlines subsequent attempts to notify them, including an FBI interview attempt with victim S.R. and contact with victim C.W.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004700.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing (affidavit) detailing the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a significant conflict of interest where Epstein paid the legal fees for James Eisenberg, who was representing T.M., a victim/witness in the case. The text also outlines the Summer 2007 negotiations resulting in the controversial non-prosecution agreement, where federal prosecution was deferred in favor of state charges to preserve federal remedies for victims.

Legal filing / court document (affidavit excerpt)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004699.jpg

This legal document, part of an affidavit by an Assistant U.S. Attorney, describes the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein that began in 2006. It focuses on the process of notifying victims, specifically mentioning letters sent by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI to victims C.W., T.M., and S.R. The document confirms these three individuals, represented by attorney Bradley Edwards, were minor victims of Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013759.jpg

This document is page 259 of a larger file, bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013759. It contains a bibliography or reference list of scientific publications ranging from 1981 to 1998. The citations focus heavily on nonlinear physics, chaos theory, dynamical systems, and neuroscience (specifically EEG analysis and seizure prediction).

Bibliography / reference list
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity