James Eisenberg
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
T.M. Griffith
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED victim]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Victim [Redacted]
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
061.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Appendix filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. in a Florida state court case involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a transcript of a June 2009 hearing regarding the unsealing of court records, administrative orders, case law, and federal court filings including a declaration by AUSA A. Marie Villafana regarding the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The appendix documents the legal arguments surrounding the transparency of the Epstein proceedings and the government's interaction with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
018.pdf
This document is a Motion for Stay filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in a civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe. They argue that a stay is mandatory under federal law because of a pending federal criminal investigation/action (the deferred prosecution agreement). Attached is a declaration from AUSA A. Marie Villafana detailing the government's interaction with victims (T.M., C.W., S.R.) and providing copies of notification letters sent to them and their attorneys regarding their rights and the non-prosecution agreement.
EFTA00014146.pdf
This document is a declaration by an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of Florida responding to a victim's emergency petition regarding the Epstein case. It details the timeline of the federal investigation, the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the government's efforts (and limitations) in notifying victims. The declaration notably reveals that attorney James Eisenberg, who represented a victim, was paid by Epstein, and explains why certain victims were not included in the federal indictment list due to credibility concerns.
EFTA00014077.pdf
This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2255.
DOJ-OGR-00004700.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (affidavit) detailing the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a significant conflict of interest where Epstein paid the legal fees for James Eisenberg, who was representing T.M., a victim/witness in the case. The text also outlines the Summer 2007 negotiations resulting in the controversial non-prosecution agreement, where federal prosecution was deferred in favor of state charges to preserve federal remedies for victims.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | James Eisenberg | $0.00 | Legal fees for the representation of T.M. (a vi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | James Eisenberg | $0.00 | Epstein paid the legal fees for James Eisenberg... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | James Eisenberg | $0.00 | Epstein paid legal fees for victim T.M.'s attorney | View |
Case Number Notification (for client)
Notification of case status and rights for client (Likely T.M.).
Victim Notification System
Notification of rights and VNS registration
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity