| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Stone
|
Competitor |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sony documents, allegedly stolen by North Korea and posted on Wikileaks, revealed a payment of 'O... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hack of Sony, attributed by some to North Korea. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Theft of Sony's files. | N/A | View |
| 2014-12-01 | N/A | Cyber attack on Sony. | Cyberspace | View |
This document appears to be an index or glossary, listing various words and the page numbers where they appear within a larger document. It includes an entry for 'Spencer' and mentions 'Smithsonian' and 'Sony'. The document also contains a 'DOJ REDACTION' and is marked with 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' and a 'DOJ-OGR' number.
This document is a page from an index or concordance, listing various words and the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in a larger document. It includes a redaction for 'DOJ REDACTION' and mentions organizations like Smithsonian and Sony, as well as a person named Spencer.
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for user 'iloveanirishboi', dated April 4, 2006. The profile belongs to a high school-aged female who identifies as a twin of mixed Cuban/French/Irish heritage and mentions connections to friends in Ohio and Georgia. The document includes DOJ markings (DOJ-OGR-00031012) indicating it was part of a federal investigation file released via public records request.
This document is page 323 from the endnotes section of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN 9780451494566 in the footer). The content lists citations for Chapters 19 and 20, focusing on the history of the NSA, Edward Snowden's leaks, cyber warfare, and intelligence gathering. It includes references to interviews the author conducted with former NSA officials (including Michael Hayden) and citations from major publications like the Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, and The New York Times between 2009 and 2015. While the filename includes 'Epst', this refers to author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein; the document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document is a page from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein), stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details an interview with filmmaker Oliver Stone, who admits to paying Edward Snowden's Russian lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, $1 million. While officially for book rights, Stone confirmed the payment was actually to secure 'total access' to Snowden and to successfully block a competing Sony film project produced by the James Bond franchise producers.
This document appears to be a page from a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, Chapter 24) produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text describes the author arranging a dinner with director Oliver Stone in New York to discuss how Stone gained access to Edward Snowden in Moscow. It details Stone's payments for rights to the Snowden story and mentions his meetings with Snowden and Vladimir Putin.
This document is page 205 from a book (indicated by the ISBN in the filename, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein) included in a House Oversight production. The text details the establishment of the U.S. Cyber Command in 2009 under General Keith Alexander, the difficulties in attributing cyber attacks (citing the 2014 Sony hack), and the NSA's mandate to dominate cyberspace and intercept information from adversaries like Russia, China, and North Korea. It mentions the NSA's annual budget of $12.3 billion and workforce size.
This document appears to be a page (page 51) from a book titled 'Hacktivist' or similar, which was included as evidence in a House Oversight investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019539). The file name 'Epst' suggests it is part of the Epstein document production. The text details the history of the Tor network, its use by Ross Ulbricht for the Silk Road, and its utilization by Chelsea Manning to leak documents to Julian Assange's WikiLeaks.
This document is an email thread from February 6, 2011, involving Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted correspondent. The correspondent sent Epstein a New York Times review of the documentary 'Inside Job' (2010), which analyzes the 2008 financial crisis. Epstein replied, dismissing the documentary by stating, 'it is very unfair, and misrepresents tons of inf' (likely meaning 'info').
An email from Jeffrey Epstein dated February 6, 2011, replying to a redacted recipient who recommended the documentary 'Inside Job' (2010). Epstein confirms he has seen it with a brief 'I have'. The email includes an embedded snippet of a New York Times review of the film by A.O. Scott.
This document is a biographical profile of cellist Yo-Yo Ma found within House Oversight Committee records (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017549). It details his career achievements, including the Silk Road Project, his role with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, his discography, and numerous awards such as the Presidential Medal of Freedom. While the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein, its inclusion in this specific document dump suggests Ma may have been a contact, attendee at a relevant event, or otherwise connected to the investigation's scope.
This document contains biographical profiles for two individuals: Adam Bly and Dr. Scott Bolton. Adam Bly is the founder of Seed magazine and a Young Global Leader associated with the World Economic Forum. Dr. Scott Bolton is a Director at the Southwest Research Institute and a Principal Investigator for NASA's Juno project. The document appears to be a briefing paper or backgrounder, marked with a House Oversight Committee file number.
This document is a page from Avenue Magazine (April 2012) featuring a society column that details celebrity sightings, parties, and gossip surrounding the Academy Awards and Independent Spirit Awards. It describes events hosted by The Weinstein Company, Chanel, and others, mentioning numerous high-profile figures including Meryl Streep, Madonna, Prince Albert, and the cast of 'The Artist'.
This document is a page from Avenue Magazine (April 2012, page 63) stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It is a social diary column chronicling high-profile Hollywood parties leading up to the Academy Awards in February 2012, including events hosted by WME's Ari Emanuel, UTA's Jim Berkus, and CAA's Bryan Lourd. The text lists numerous celebrities, industry executives, and socialites in attendance, but contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is page 62 of Avenue Magazine (April 2012), stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013456', suggesting it is part of a larger production likely related to the House Oversight Committee's investigation into Epstein/Maxwell. The text is a social column describing various pre-Oscar parties and events in Los Angeles, including a dinner hosted by Betsey Bloomingdale (attended by Nancy Reagan), a party by Ron Meyer (attended by Tom Cruise and Leonardo DiCaprio), and a British Film Reception. While high-profile socialites and Hollywood figures are mentioned, neither Jeffrey Epstein nor Ghislaine Maxwell are explicitly named on this specific page, though the context of the production stamp implies a connection to their social circle or seized documents.
This document is a page from Avenue Magazine (April 2012) stamped with HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013452. The article discusses the 2011 Oscar race, highlighting various films and directors including Woody Allen, Terrence Malick, and Martin Scorsese. It explicitly mentions Harvey Weinstein as the 'ringmaster' introducing the film 'The Artist'.
This document is a social diary or report page marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' describing various high-profile Hollywood events during the pre-Oscar week, specifically around Friday, February 24 (likely 2012). It details attendees, locations, and gossip from events hosted by Ron Meyer, Betsey Bloomingdale, the British Consulate, Women in Film, and Vanity Fair. Key figures include numerous A-list celebrities, politicians, and industry executives.
This document appears to be a draft article or memo analyzing the contenders for the 2011 Academy Awards (Oscars). It details the release strategies and reception of films such as 'The Artist', 'The Help', 'The Descendants', 'Hugo', and 'Moneyball', while mentioning key industry figures like Harvey Weinstein, Woody Allen, and George Clooney. The document contains a highlighted section regarding DreamWorks' 'The Help' and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a government document production.
This document is page 14 of a legal filing arguing that an attorney named Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that Edwards had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and testimony from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—regarding Epstein's abuse of minor girls. It specifically notes that these individuals were considered 'friends' of Epstein believed to possess relevant information.
An email sent on February 6, 2011, from a redacted sender to 'jeeproject@yahoo.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein). The email subject suggests the recipient watch the documentary 'Inside Job' and the body of the email consists entirely of a New York Times review of the film by A.O. Scott, which details the 2008 financial crisis.
A detailed social report, likely written by publicist Peggy Siegal (referred to as 'Peg'), recounting her attendance at exclusive Hollywood events during Oscar weekend in late February 2011. The document describes interactions with A-list celebrities including Harrison Ford, Johnny Depp, and Brad Pitt at parties hosted by Jim Burkus, Bryan Lourd, and Barry Diller. It concludes with a description of the Oscar broadcast rehearsal at the Kodak Theater.
This legal document, dated September 12, 2013, outlines attorney Edwards' defense against Epstein's claims of improper litigation tactics. Edwards asserts he had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and depositions from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—believing they possessed relevant information regarding Epstein's alleged sexual assaults. The document argues these individuals were identified as Epstein's 'close friends' and that seeking their testimony met the legal standard for discovery.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a productivity guide or internal standard operating procedure (SOP) related to Tim Ferriss's '4-Hour Workweek' methodology, specifically regarding 'Processing Rules' and managing Virtual Assistants (VAs). It outlines technical setups for calendar syncing (referencing 2009 technology), management philosophies regarding delegation, and a step-by-step guide for hiring and testing VAs. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was included as evidence in a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document, appearing to be an excerpt from a narrative report or book within a House Oversight file, details a meeting between the author and director Oliver Stone. They discuss Stone's exclusivity deal with Snowden's lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena (an FSB board member), which blocked a competing Sony project. The author, seeking to interview Snowden, learns that Snowden is aware of their book project and subsequently hires Moscow 'fixer' Zamir Gotta to facilitate a meeting.
This document is a page from a book (Chapter 24) detailing a dinner between the narrator and director Oliver Stone in New York. The conversation focuses on Stone's film about Edward Snowden, specifically probing the financial arrangements Stone made to gain access to Snowden in Moscow, including a $1 million payment to Snowden's lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, for 'total access' disguised as book rights. The text also mentions the Sony Pictures hack and payments made to The Guardian.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity