Congress
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
President Johnson
|
Political opposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Separation of powers |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence operation |
7
|
1 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
US congressional delegations
|
Visitor host |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Lobbying |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jimmy Carter
|
Governmental executive legislative communication |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Delegation of authority |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
President Obama
|
Political adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Administration
|
Political alignment on china policy |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Orrin G. Hatch
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John D. Rockefeller IV
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christine C. Quin
|
Guest of honor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Carter
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Wilson
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Eisenhower
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Institutional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Constitutional opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President (Executive Branch)
|
Constitutional separation of powers |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Dubai bought US port operations and faced political backlash. | USA | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Dubai bought US port operations and faced political backlash in US Congress | USA | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Publication of a report by the Select Committee, U.S. Congress (Cox Report). | U.S. | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of the Select Committee on National Security and Military and Commercial Concerns w... | Washington D.C. | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | US Congress set up the Select Committee on National Security and Military and Commercial Concerns... | United States | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | US Congress set up a special bipartisan investigative unit regarding Chinese technology theft. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 1989-01-01 | N/A | A period of turmoil in US-China relations where Beijing relied more heavily on lobbying the US bu... | United States, China | View |
| 1989-01-01 | N/A | The Chinese crackdown around Tiananmen Square, which prompted active resistance from the US Congr... | Tiananmen Square, China | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Assassination of Indira Gandhi and subsequent election victory for the Congress party. | India | View |
| 1979-01-01 | N/A | Passage of the Taiwan Relations Act by the US Congress. | United States | View |
| 1955-07-13 | N/A | President Eisenhower sent a special message to Congress upon signing the Department of Defense Ap... | N/A | View |
| 1946-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case United States v. Lovett, where the President enforced a law he believed was un... | United States | View |
| 1946-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case *United States v. Lovett*, where the President enforced a statute he believed ... | United States | View |
| 1946-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compens... | United States | View |
| 1938-01-01 | N/A | Enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). | United States | View |
| 1935-01-01 | N/A | Enactment of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017608.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or journal article submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legislative history and intent of the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), contrasting it with the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act. It highlights the Congressional goal to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and are active participants in the legal system, citing various Senators and legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017606.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis or journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) included in a House Oversight production, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen. It argues for the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) during the investigation phase, before formal charges are filed, critiquing the DOJ/OLC position to the contrary. The text specifically cites the "Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case" as a primary example of why victim participation is necessary before charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (Page 2 of 31) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and whether victim rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a conflict between a 2010 DOJ OLC opinion, which argued rights do not attach pre-charging, and Senator Jon Kyl, who argued they do. The text specifically uses the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case in Florida as a concrete example of the controversy, noting that victims argued they should have been consulted regarding his non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017600.jpg
This document, marked as a House Oversight record, draws parallels between private military contractor Erik Prince (Blackwater) and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets. It details the controversial legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein by Ken Starr and others, specifically highlighting the sweeping immunity granted by the Southern District of Florida non-prosecution agreement. The text explicitly suggests Epstein's light sentence is best explained by the use of children for 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017597.jpg
This document contains an email correspondence sent to a reporter at the St. Augustine Record. The writer makes conspiratorial allegations linking a woman named Ms. Simms and the Horton family to a 2007 murder, child exploitation, and terror financing. The email also discusses legal proceedings involving FDLE agent Rusty Rogers and diverges into theories about 9/11, the DHS, and the National Science Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017584.jpg
This document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from the technology, political, and academic sectors, possibly serving as a guest list for a conference or retreat (such as the Dialog Retreat mentioned in Auren Hoffman's bio). It includes the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017584', indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. Notably, the list includes a 'Jeff Epstein,' who is identified as the former CFO of Oracle, distinct from the financier Jeffrey Epstein typically associated with such investigations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017393.jpg
This page appears to be a draft from a manuscript (dated April 2, 2012, with a high word count) discussing the constitutional separation of church and state. The author argues that this separation actually strengthens religion in America compared to Europe or Israel, where state involvement creates resentment. It references historical figures Roger Williams, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, typical of documents produced during congressional investigations related to the Epstein case (often associated with Alan Dershowitz's records).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017388.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the biographical details and the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT') discussing the author's views on the Constitution, religion, and the Pledge of Allegiance. It recounts a personal anecdote from 1970 where the author's son, Elon, misunderstood the phrase 'under God' as 'under guard' due to a Boston accent while the family was living in California. The text explores the legal and philosophical implications of the Establishment Clause and religious tests.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017368.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses the author's involvement in the Clinton impeachment, his interactions with Monica Lewinsky's mother, and his book 'Sexual McCarthyism.' It concludes with a transition to a 'next celebrity' (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) whom the author describes as having thin skin compared to Clinton and Starr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017363.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the arguments and the specific testimony quoted) labeled with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text recounts the author's testimony before Congress defending President Clinton against impeachment by arguing there is a hierarchy of perjury, distinguishing Clinton's 'marginal' lies from more dangerous police perjury ('testilying'). The author also describes a disagreement with Chief Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat regarding the nature of perjury.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017361.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context) analyzing the legal strategy of President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The text critiques the decision to allow Clinton to testify before the grand jury and discusses a conversation between the author and Clinton at a party on Martha's Vineyard regarding the Paula Jones lawsuit. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a discovery production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017314.jpg
A document dated April 2, 2012, appearing to be a draft page (page 227) from a book or legal manuscript. The text contrasts the progress of science (specifically DNA evidence) in exonerating the innocent with the 'regression' of the law, specifically criticizing the Supreme Court and Congress for making it difficult to reopen closed cases. The author heavily criticizes Justice Scalia's view that 'actual innocence' is not a constitutional claim if the original trial was procedurally fair.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017218.jpg
This document appears to be a page (131) from a draft manuscript or book, dated April 2, 2012. The author discusses the philosophy of legal codes regarding speech, arguing against retroactive discipline. The author recounts co-teaching a course on 'Taboo' with Professor Steven Pinker in 2007, exploring the boundaries of free speech, societal taboos versus government censorship, and national security secrets.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017215.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal commentary dated April 2, 2012. The text argues against the 'selective prosecution' of journalists for publishing classified information, suggesting that laws should be applied uniformly to force legislative reform, rather than allowing discretion that favors mainstream outlets like the New York Times. The author critiques Gabriel Schoenfeld's view that prosecutorial discretion is a reliable safeguard, arguing instead for precise legislative prohibitions enforced by the courts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017174.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 87) from a manuscript draft, likely a book on constitutional law or civil liberties (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the House Oversight production). The text analyzes the First and Fourteenth Amendments, the incorporation doctrine, and the expansion of free speech prohibitions from just 'Congress' to the entire 'government.' It references Justice Hugo Black and the case of Cohen v. the United States (referring to the 'Fuck the draft' jacket case, usually known as Cohen v. California).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017173.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 86) from a manuscript draft, dated April 2, 2012, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text is a philosophical and legal essay discussing the value of dissent, analyzing the First Amendment through the lens of a debate between Justices Hugo Black and Felix Frankfurter regarding the words 'Congress' and 'no.' The author (writing in the first person) expresses admiration for biblical and historical figures who challenged authority.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017171.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) of a book, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific legal history and cases mentioned (Harry Reems, bestiality defense, etc.). The text discusses the evolution of the First Amendment, contrasting it with Charlton Heston's views on the Second Amendment, and lists the controversial types of speech the author has defended. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case in which Dershowitz was involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027493.jpg
This document is a log of electronic messages from November 2018, extracted from a House Oversight investigation file. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The exchange involves a trivia fact about Shari Lewis and her puppet 'Lamb Chop' testifying before Congress, followed by a suggestion to 'bring lamb chop tomorrow' and the response 'Don't fuck with 'the chop''.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027351.jpg
A log of digital messages exchanged on July 27, 2018, between a redacted individual and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com). The conversation covers a cancelled appearance on Sean Hannity's show, a Financial Times article by Ganesh, and ongoing political controversies involving Donald Trump Jr., Matt Calamari, and Roy Moore. Epstein offers critical feedback on a film/documentary featuring the recipient (referencing 'dharma ending'), advising them to project an image of 'WINNING' rather than destruction, and comparing the portrayal to Robert McNamara.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027168.jpg
This document is a log of five digital messages exchanged on February 21, 2017. The conversation is between an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual, discussing how to frame a concept regarding health information privacy for the 'average American' and 'congress.' The redacted participant asks if 'bills office' can assist with the initiative.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027110.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis article or report (bearing a House Oversight footer) discussing US foreign policy in the Middle East circa 2013. It covers the US withdrawal from Iraq, the reduced military presence in the Gulf due to budget cuts, the Syrian civil war, and the relationship between the US, Egypt (under the Muslim Brotherhood), and Iran. It specifically speculates on the role of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani and the potential for a diplomatic shift between the Muslim Brotherhood and Iranian leadership.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027108.jpg
This document page, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027108, contains text from two news articles. The first segment discusses Obama's diplomatic approach to adversaries, specifically Iran. The second is an article from 'The National' dated Feb 8, 2013, analyzing the diplomatic visit of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Cairo to meet Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, noting the historical significance as the first such visit since 1979.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a political article or briefing paper analyzing U.S.-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations, sanctions, and the political stalemate between the Obama administration and Congress (circa 2013). It references the Council on Foreign Relations and Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearings. While stamped with a House Oversight mark typical of the Epstein document dumps, the specific text on this page concerns geopolitical strategy and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026956.jpg
This document is a Goldman Sachs Investment Management Division presentation slide (page 12) analyzing the financial and human costs of major US wars, specifically comparing Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. It includes a table detailing military costs and casualties, noting that the total cost of the war on terror is estimated at $5.9 trillion, and features a Gallup poll chart tracking American public opinion on defense spending from 1969 to 2019. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026956, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.jpg
An email dated February 8, 2019, from Richard Kahn (HBRK Associates Inc.) to Jeffrey Epstein. The email contains a link to an NBC News article about a tax expert telling Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Donald Trump's tax returns. The email is marked with High importance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity