| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
President Johnson
|
Political opposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Separation of powers |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence operation |
7
|
1 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
US congressional delegations
|
Visitor host |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Lobbying |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jimmy Carter
|
Governmental executive legislative communication |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Delegation of authority |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
President Obama
|
Political adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Administration
|
Political alignment on china policy |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Orrin G. Hatch
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John D. Rockefeller IV
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christine C. Quin
|
Guest of honor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Carter
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Wilson
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Eisenhower
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Institutional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Constitutional opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President (Executive Branch)
|
Constitutional separation of powers |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The 'Blueprint' for tax reform was released by House Republicans shortly before Congress left for... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US Election (Trump and Republican Congress win) | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The 'fiscal cliff', a pending crisis involving the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts and automatic ... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Passage of the Tenure of Office Act over President Johnson's veto. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Tenure of Office Act was passed over President Johnson's veto. This act placed restrictions o... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The fiscal year for which the Trump administration's first budget proposal and congressional budg... | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | US Congress is in the midst of a major reevaluation of the American policy of 'engagement' with C... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Expected timeframe for a focus on tax reform. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Chinese government used various entities (CCP, CAIFU, CAIFC) and individuals (Jimmy Wong) to ... | China, United States | View |
| 2018-03-05 | N/A | Start of the Party Congress session to change the Constitution and lift term limits. | China | View |
| 2018-03-01 | N/A | Meeting of the National People's Congress | China | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | The House China Working Group remained active, while the House Congressional China Caucus and the... | United States | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | The US Congress unanimously passed the Taiwan Travel Act, which encourages the Trump administrati... | United States | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | Year in which trade legislative issues were expected to figure prominently under the new administ... | United States | View |
| 2016-10-01 | N/A | Passage of the 9/11 Saudi bill | USA | View |
| 2016-09-01 | N/A | US Congress passed JASTA legislation overriding Presidential veto. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2016-02-01 | N/A | Congress approved a customs reauthorization measure that made the Internet Tax Freedom Act perman... | United States | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | 2016 lame-duck session of Congress, during which the fate of tax extenders would be decided. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Passage of the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) through Congress. | United States | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | A bipartisan vote in Congress extended the Community Health Center Fund for two additional years ... | United States | View |
| 2014-02-13 | N/A | Military Times reported that the NSA informed Congress that Snowden had copied a co-worker's pass... | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-02 | N/A | Enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), which made permanent most of the tr... | United States | View |
This document is a page from a 2016 policy report by Ernst & Young (EY) analyzing US tax reform proposals. It discusses the Republican 'Blueprint' for tax reform, competing plans from Senator Hatch, and political commentary from figures like Paul Ryan and Senator Warren. The document, bearing the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022387, contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities; its content is exclusively focused on tax policy.
This document, a page from a 2016 EY report on tax policy, analyzes and contrasts various US tax reform proposals from the 2016 election period. It details plans from Donald Trump and the House Republican 'Blueprint,' including proposed tax rates and a shift to a destination-basis system, while also noting Democratic preferences for a worldwide system. Despite the user's query, this document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals or events; its content is strictly focused on US and international tax policy.
This document is a tax policy analysis from EY, dated shortly after the 2016 US election. It analyzes and compares the comprehensive tax reform proposals from President-elect Donald Trump's campaign and the House Republican 'Blueprint' authored by Speaker Paul Ryan. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is exclusively about tax policy and contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or matters.
This document outlines key legislative issues for the U.S. Congress during its lame-duck session. It discusses pending matters related to Medicare premiums, energy and water resource bills, and financial services reform. Significant topics include potential action on the CHOICE Act, the legislative response to the Wells Fargo scandal, and a commitment to provide assistance to Flint, Michigan.
This document outlines the legislative agenda for the 2016 lame-duck session of the U.S. Congress following the Republican election sweep. The agenda is expected to be minimalist, primarily focusing on government funding, with potential action on tax extenders, pensions, and major health legislation like the 21st Century Cures Act and a mental health bill. The Republican leadership aims to pass short-term measures to allow the incoming Trump administration to influence fiscal 2017 spending.
This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, is a political analysis of the incoming Trump administration's agenda. It outlines key policy pledges, such as repealing the ACA and enacting tax reform, and details the legislative strategy of using the 'Budget Reconciliation' process. The document references figures like President-elect Trump and Speaker Ryan, and draws a parallel to President George W. Bush's 2001 tax cuts. Despite the file's potential origin in a larger document collection, its content is exclusively about US politics and government finance and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document outlines the proposed administrative agenda for the incoming Trump administration, focusing on its top priorities for the first 100 days. Key initiatives include infrastructure investment, tax reform, repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and immigration reform, alongside a list of specific acts to be enacted. The brief also discusses the procedural challenges of repealing existing regulations, plans to fill the Supreme Court vacancy, and intended actions on trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPP.
This document, created by EY following the 2016 election, profiles the leadership of key U.S. House of Representatives committees. It lists the Republican chairmen and Democratic ranking members for the Appropriations, Budget, Financial Services, Judiciary, Oversight, and Transportation committees, noting leadership continuity and changes from the 114th Congress. The document's identifier is 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022379'.
This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, provides a profile of expected US Senate committee leadership for the upcoming Congress. It details the chairmen and ranking members for key committees and analyzes the various political scenarios influencing these appointments, such as retirements, term limits, and senators' strategic choices. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is purely about US Senate politics and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a one-page political analysis report from EY, dated 'Election 2016,' discussing the results and implications of the 2016 U.S. election. It analyzes the Republican majorities in the House and Senate, potential legislative challenges like the Senate's 60-vote cloture rule, and the change in the number of GOP House seats. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or related activities.
This document, produced by EY and labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022374, is a political analysis of the 2016 US election results. It discusses the Republican party's control of the White House and Congress and provides a detailed breakdown of outcomes in key Senate races across multiple states. This document is exclusively about US politics and contains no information, mentions, or connections to Jeffrey Epstein or any related subjects.
This document, page 5 of a 'Tax Topics' report dated April 29, 2013, analyzes two U.S. tax policy proposals: limiting the size of tax-advantaged retirement accounts and replacing the standard CPI with a 'Chained CPI'. It provides commentary on the political motivations and potential consequences of these proposals, referencing President Obama and Treasury Secretary Lew. Despite the user's query, the document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, dated April 29, 2013, is a technical analysis of proposed changes to U.S. tax laws affecting sophisticated estate planning techniques. It details proposals to eliminate the benefits of 'sales to defective grantor trusts', extend estate tax liens, and curb the use of Health and Education Exclusion Trusts (HEETs) by clarifying the rules for the Generation-Skipping Transfer tax. The document carries a Bates number suggesting it was collected as part of a House Oversight committee file.
This document, dated April 29, 2013, is a page from a tax analysis memo discussing proposed changes to U.S. tax laws affecting high-net-worth individuals. It outlines several proposals, including restoring 2009 transfer tax parameters, requiring minimum terms for Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), and limiting the GST exemption. The document contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals; its only potential connection is the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, which suggests it may have been collected as part of a congressional investigation's evidence gathering.
This document is a tax advisory memo from Blanche Lark Christerson of Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, dated April 29, 2013. The memo analyzes two tax proposals from President Obama's Fiscal Year 2014 budget: one to limit tax benefits for high-income earners and another known as the 'Buffett Rule' or 'Fair Share Tax'. After a thorough analysis, the document contains no information, names, or keywords related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its content is strictly focused on US tax policy.
This document is a table of contents for a publication titled 'Tax Topics,' listing subjects covered in 2002. The topics are exclusively related to U.S. tax legislation, IRS rulings, and economic policy discussions from that year, such as the 2001 Tax Act, estate tax, and stimulus proposals. The document contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
This document is a table of contents from a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics', listing summaries of tax-related articles, court cases, and legislative updates from late 2002 and 2003. The content is exclusively about general U.S. tax law, case precedents, and policy proposals from that era. Although the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was collected during a congressional investigation, it contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, finances, or activities.
This document is a table of contents from a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics', listing articles and legal updates from 2009 and 2010. The topics are highly technical and relate to U.S. tax law, including estate tax, IRA conversions, legislative proposals from the Obama administration, and various legal cases. The document itself contains no direct information about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his activities; its relevance is likely contextual, originating from a larger file collection.
This document, dated December 20, 2013, is a 'Tax Topics' newsletter analyzing US political events and their tax implications. It discusses the recent government shutdown's effect on the tax filing season, the Senate Democrats' use of the 'nuclear option' for judicial nominees, the meaning of 'permanency' in tax law, and the IRS's newly issued federal interest rates for December 2013. The document does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is a tax policy analysis from December 20, 2013, discussing legislative challenges and political dynamics in U.S. tax law. It analyzes the status of temporary tax 'extenders,' the impact of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), and the dim prospects for comprehensive tax reform in 2014. The document makes no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or topics; its content is strictly focused on federal tax policy.
This document is a 'Tax Topics' newsletter from Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, dated December 20, 2013, authored by Blanche Lark Christerson. It analyzes a recent bipartisan budget deal, discusses the status of tax reform legislation, and explains temporary tax provisions known as 'extenders'. The document contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein; its relevance is likely contextual, stemming from its origin at Deutsche Bank and its inclusion in a collection of documents from the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a Final Rule (29 CFR Part 104) from the National Labor Relations Board. The rule establishes the definitions and obligations for employers to post notices informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. This document is a standard government regulatory publication and contains no information, names, locations, or events related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments and the issuing agency's response to a new labor rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights regarding unionization. The document discusses the economic impact of the rule, its classification under the Congressional Review Act, and its exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This document is related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) justification for a new rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights. The NLRB concludes the rule will not have a significant economic impact on small businesses, estimating the cost at $64.40, and refutes critical comments from organizations like Baker & Daniels LLP. Despite the user's prompt suggesting a link to Epstein, the document's content is exclusively about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, containing a dissenting opinion regarding a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposed rule. The author argues that the Board majority's plan to mandate the posting of employee rights notices is based on insufficient evidence and is therefore 'arbitrary and capricious'. The document is related to U.S. labor law and has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity