Robert D. Critton, Jr.
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
33
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jay P. Lefkowitz
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Counsel for epstein |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JACK A. GOLDBERGER
|
Correspondent cc |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Counsel for |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-06-29 | N/A | Signing of Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2010-06-28 | N/A | Electronic filing of legal document in Doe v. Epstein case. | Florida Southern District C... | View |
| 2010-06-16 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by defense counsel | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-06-16 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-04-12 | N/A | Date of signature/service of the document. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2009-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Defendant Epstein's Motion to Attend Mediation | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-11-16 | N/A | Filing of Reply to Response regarding preservation of evidence | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-11-16 | N/A | Filing of Reply to RRA's Response | US District Court, Southern... | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Affidavit of Robert D. Critton, Jr. entered on FLSD Docket for the case 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Deposition scheduled but canceled due to an incident involving Jeffrey Epstein and the plaintiff. | Florida Science Foundation ... | View |
| 2009-08-20 | N/A | Filing of Defendant Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-07-28 | N/A | Filing of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Notice of Compliance with Court Order (DE #192) | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-07-28 | N/A | Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a Notice of Compliance regarding the Court's Order DE #192. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Defendant's Notice of Withdrawal of Arguments I Through VII | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-06-05 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP for Jeffrey Epstein | US District Court, Southern... | View |
| 2009-06-04 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Limited Appearance | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2009-05-21 | N/A | Motion for Limited Appearance filed for Michael D. Shumsky | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-05-21 | N/A | Deadline set by Podhurst Orseck for confirmation that preservation steps have been taken. | N/A | View |
| 2009-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Limited Appearance for Jay P. Lefkowitz | US District Court, Southern... | View |
| 2009-05-18 | N/A | Filing of Defendant Epstein's Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page Limitation | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-05-13 | N/A | Start of state court trial (Cardiopulmonary & Primary Care Assoc. v. Lewis). | State Court (Florida) | View |
| 2009-05-11 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike on behalf of J... | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2009-05-01 | N/A | Motion for Extension filed. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-02-05 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Protective Order | Palm Beach Gardens, FL | View |
028-02.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
026.pdf
This document is a Motion for Limited Appearance filed on May 21, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:09-CV-80591-KAM). Robert D. Critton, Jr. requests the court to admit Michael D. Shumsky of Kirkland & Ellis LLP as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists legal counsel for both the plaintiff (Jane Doe 101) and the defendant, along with their contact information.
025.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on May 21, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida case Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Local counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. requests the court to admit Jay P. Lefkowitz (of Kirkland & Ellis LLP) pro hac vice to represent Jeffrey Epstein. The document outlines Lefkowitz's qualifications, confirms payment of the admission fee, and provides service information for all counsel of record.
021.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 18, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers requested permission to exceed the standard 20-page limit for their upcoming motion to dismiss, citing complex legal issues regarding the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §2255 and its applicability to the alleged conduct. Plaintiff's counsel agreed to this request via telephone.
016.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on May 11, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys oppose the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously, arguing that Epstein's due process rights to conduct discovery—specifically issuance of third-party subpoenas to medical providers and employers—require the use of the plaintiff's legal name. The filing asserts that the plaintiff's privacy interests do not outweigh the presumption of open judicial proceedings and Epstein's right to defend himself against allegations of sexual exploitation and coercion.
015.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on May 7, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON). Attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike of the law firm Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman formally enter their appearance as counsel for the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing counsel for the Plaintiff (Jane Doe No. 101) and co-counsel for the Defendant.
012.pdf
Legal filing from May 4, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team accepts consolidation of multiple civil cases for depositions but opposes general consolidation for all discovery, arguing that individual cases have distinct facts and defenses that would be confused by a blanket consolidation. The document lists numerous related case numbers (e.g., 08-80119, 08-80381, 09-80469) and requests clarification on the court's previous orders regarding case management.
011.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 4, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's counsel requests an extension until May 26, 2009, to respond to the complaint filed on April 17, 2009. The reasons cited include the burden of other cases naming Epstein as a defendant and a conflicting state court trial scheduled for mid-May involving the defense counsel.
002.pdf
Summons in a Civil Case issued on April 17, 2009, by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida for Case No. 09-80591 (Jane Doe 101 v. Jeffrey Epstein). The document summons Jeffrey Epstein, noted as being located at the Palm Beach County Stockade, to answer the complaint within 20 days. It lists Epstein's defense counsel (Spicer, Goldberger, Critton) and the plaintiff's attorneys (Josefsberg and Ezell of Podhurst Orseck, P.A.).
016.pdf
This document is a 'Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice' filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 24, 2010. It formally ends the lawsuit between Plaintiff 'C.L.' and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement. The document is signed by attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. (representing Epstein) and Spencer T. Kuvin (representing C.L.).
012.pdf
This document is an Emergency Motion filed on June 14, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to quash a subpoena and prevent the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, scheduled for the following day. Epstein's lawyers argue that the subpoena issued by C.L.'s counsel (Spencer Kuvin) is premature under Rule 26(d) and that the cross-notice by Jane Doe's counsel (Brad Edwards) is invalid because discovery in the Jane Doe case had already concluded on May 31, 2010. The document includes the motion, a subpoena exhibit, and a cross-notice exhibit.
009.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff C.L. opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to dismiss Count III of her complaint. The core legal argument concerns whether the Adam Walsh Act (2006) can be applied retroactively to Epstein's conduct; the Plaintiff argues it provides a civil, non-punitive remedy and thus does not violate the Ex Post Facto clause. The document also graphically describes Epstein's 'systematic' child exploitation enterprise, involving at least three assistants who recruited, groomed, and paid minor girls, which Epstein sought to strike from the record.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 11, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 10-80447) by Plaintiff C.L. requesting a 10-day extension to respond to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The extension was requested because Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer T. Kuvin, had a conflicting trial starting the same day in Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing Epstein's legal team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) and a proposed order for Judge Kenneth A. Marra to sign.
001-01.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on March 31, 2010, initiating a federal lawsuit by plaintiff 'C.L.' against Jeffrey Epstein. The cause of action is cited as sexual assault of a minor under 18 U.S.C §2255 and §2422. The document lists Epstein's legal team, including Jack Goldberger, Bruce Reinhart, and Robert Critton, and references numerous related federal cases.
DOJ-OGR-00030305.tif
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on September 17, 2009, detailing the cancellation of a deposition involving Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition was called off because Jeffrey Epstein made face-to-face contact with the plaintiff, Jane Doe 4, which her counsel, Adam Horowitz, stated intimidated her and violated a prior stipulation that Epstein would not be present. Defense counsel, Robert Critton, argued that Epstein was instructed to leave the building and planned to appear via Skype, and that the encounter would not have happened if the plaintiff and her counsel had arrived on time.
DOJ-OGR-00030300.tif
This document is an affidavit from Robert D. Critton, Jr., counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, filed on September 17, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The affidavit pertains to case 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON, where Jane Doe No. 2 is the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein is the defendant, and asserts the truthfulness and reasonableness of information and costs related to the legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00030292.tif
This document is a page from a legal filing, listing contact information for various attorneys and their respective clients in several related court cases. It details counsel for plaintiffs, including C.M.A., and counsel for defendants Sarah Kellen and Jeffrey Epstein, along with their law firms and contact details.
DOJ-OGR-00030281.tif
This document is a legal letter dated August 27, 2009, from Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP to Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. It concerns the case Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, informing Mermelstein that Mr. Epstein intends to be present at his client's deposition as a party-defendant, but will not engage in conversation with Mermelstein's client.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013481.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (Pages 1-4) of a videotaped deposition of Bradley J. Edwards, taken on March 23, 2010, in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. Notable attendees included Jeffrey Epstein himself and his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013479.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on June 28, 2010, in the case of Doe v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). It certifies that defense counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. electronically served a preceding document to plaintiff's counsel (Edwards and Cassell) and co-defense counsel (Goldberger). The document lists the contact information for the attorneys involved, though specific email addresses or contact details have been redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing entered on June 28, 2010, in the case of Doe v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys request a court order for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or further mediation with Rodney Romano before July 1, 2010. The Rule 7.1 Certification indicates that the Plaintiff's counsel opposes this request, stating that mediation requirements have already been met.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030464.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 8, 2011, where Jeffrey Epstein forwards a new Vanity Fair article about himself and Ghislaine Maxwell to his paralegal, Jessica Cadwell. Cadwell replies with a supportive message, calling the article 'well written' and asking how he is. The forwarded article details Maxwell's alleged role as a 'procurer,' Epstein's past legal troubles, and his connections to prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Les Wexner.
Service of Motion for Protective Order
Certificate of Service indicating the document was filed via CM/ECF.
Certificate of Service
Certification that a document was electronically filed and served via CM/ECF.
Epstein's Motion for Protective Order
Electronic filing and service of the motion for protective order.
Service of Stipulation of Dismissal
Electronic filing and service of the stipulation document via CM/ECF
Notice of Appearance
Filing of appearance as counsel for Defendant and certificate of service
Rule 7.1 Certification
Good faith effort to resolve issues; Plaintiff's counsel stated parties already complied with requirements.
Defendant Epstein's Motion to Attend Mediation
Service of motion requesting permission for Epstein to attend mediation regarding Carolyn Andriano.
Reply to Response to Motion
Filing of Reply to RRA's Response regarding preservation of evidence
Reply to RRA's Response to Motion for Preservation of Evi...
Filing of the reply and certification of service via CM/ECF.
Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein
Informing that Epstein plans to attend the deposition but will not engage in conversation.
Service of Reply Memorandum
Electronic service of the reply document via CM/ECF system.
Notice of Withdrawal of Arguments
Service of legal document via CM/ECF
Motion for Limited Appearance
Service of Motion for Limited Appearance via CM/ECF
Response to request
Stating the request is unnecessary as Epstein has not contacted clients, except for one instance where a client contacted Goldberger's office.
Service of Motion for Limited Appearance
Service of motion via CM/ECF system
Service of Motion
Service of Motion for Limited Appearance via CM/ECF
Re: [Redacted]
Response to April 17 letter, refusing to concede that the Non-Prosecution Agreement prevents all contact. Heavily redacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity