David H. Brodie
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe 17
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 17
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice signed by parties. | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-10-28 | N/A | Filing of Appearance of Counsel by David H. Brodie | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-10-25 | N/A | Order granting David H. Brodie admission to appear Pro Hac Vice | Southern District of New York | View |
048.pdf
This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF in the Southern District of New York, filed on October 8, 2020. Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 voluntarily dismisses her action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities without costs. The document is signed by attorneys David H. Brodie (for the Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the Defendants).
041.pdf
A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. ยง 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities (including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company). The motion requests a court order allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and lists the legal representation for the plaintiff from three different law firms.
024-01.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.
019.pdf
This document is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on October 28, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). Attorney David H. Brodie enters his appearance as counsel for 'All plaintiffs' (identified as Jane Doe 17 in the caption) in the lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
016.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the motion for attorney David H. Brodie to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the plaintiff.
Certificate of Service
Certification that the document was electronically filed via CM/ECF system and mailed to non-participants.
Appearance of Counsel
Notification that David H. Brodie is appearing as counsel for all plaintiffs in the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity