| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
33
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
R. Alexander Acosta
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matt Menchel
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
The LS Law Firm
|
Employment ownership |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JACK A. GOLDBERGER
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal representation | Epstein hired Miami criminal defense attorneys Guy Lewis and Lilly Ann Sanchez. | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Article published in print | New York Times | View |
| 2010-11-29 | N/A | Filing of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Certification of Compliance with Rule 7.1(a)(3) | Florida Southern District C... | View |
| 2010-11-22 | N/A | Filing of Reply in Support of Renewed Motion to Quash | Court Docket | View |
| 2010-10-29 | N/A | Epstein's counsel filed motion to quash service. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-01-24 | N/A | Filing of federal lawsuit and subsequent news conference. | Federal Courthouse, West Pa... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Plea deal negotiation. | Unknown (implied Florida) | View |
| 2007-12-19 | N/A | Previous letter from US Attorney to Lilly Ann Sanchez referenced. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum by Jeffrey Epstein, acknowledging understanding and agreement to comply wi... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signature of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement by Jeffrey Epstein and others. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez sign the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution ... | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | Legal agreement signing | Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, signed the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agree... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Lilly Ann Sanchez signs the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Signing of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Unknown (Legal Office) | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Date associated with the signatures of Jeffrey Epstein's counsel (Lefcourt and Sanchez). | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-09 | N/A | Letter sent rejecting Sanchez's proposal regarding victim claim resolution and proposing a mediat... | Miami, Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signature of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement by Lilly Ann Sanchez on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement by Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez. | Unknown | View |
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features Jeffrey Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, acknowledging he understands the conditions of the agreement. The document lists R. Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney) and Epstein's defense counsel, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, though they have not signed this specific copy.
This document is the final signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. While signature blocks are prepared for Jeffrey Epstein, Gerald Lefcourt, R. Alexander Acosta, and A. Marie Villafaña, the only executed signature visible is that of Lilly Ann Sanchez, Attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 24, 2007. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains Epstein's signature and the handwritten date 9/24/07. The page also lists R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez as parties to the agreement, though their signatures are not present on this specific page copy. The header indicates this document was filed in court on 05/25/21 as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the final days of plea negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in August 2007. It includes a transcript of a letter signed by Matthew Menchel (on behalf of U.S. Attorney Acosta) setting a non-negotiable two-year incarceration term and an August 17 deadline. The narrative explains that the deadline was set to allow prosecutor Villafaña time to investigate Epstein's assistants and computers in New York if the deal was rejected, and notes that Menchel sent this letter on his final day at the USAO.
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez (Epstein's attorney) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative (FAUSA) for Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana on October 30, 2007, under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. The signatures for Jeffrey Epstein and Gerald Lefcourt are blank on this copy.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein understands the conditions of the agreement. The page is signed and dated September 24, 2007, by Gerald Lefcourt, Esq., counsel to Jeffrey Epstein. Other signature lines for R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, Jeffrey Epstein, and Lilly Ann Sanchez are present but blank on this specific copy.
This document is page 7 of 7 of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains the signatures executing the agreement, specifically signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña on September 27, 2007, and Epstein's counsel Gerald Lefcourt on September 24, 2007. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
This document appears to be an email fragment or draft containing a quote from a news summary regarding Epstein's defense team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, Weinberg) refuting federal sex trafficking allegations. It includes a link to a Miami Herald article. The footer contains a signature for Lilly Ann Sanchez of The LS Law Firm and a confidentiality disclaimer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Edward Epstein) and directs errors to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.
This document appears to be the conclusion of an email sent by attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It quotes a response to a newspaper editorial regarding the Epstein case and Alexander Acosta, asserting there was no evidence of federal sex trafficking offenses. The document includes a strict legal disclaimer noting the content is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs error reports to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document is an email chain from March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein via the address jeevacation@gmail.com). The emails contain significant redactions under privilege, but the visible content is a forwarded Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article details the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recusing itself from the Epstein case and the Department of Justice reassigning the victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta.
This document appears to be the footer and signature block of an email from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It contains an excerpt discussing a response by Epstein's legal team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, and Weinberg) to a 'Times editorial' regarding Alexander Acosta and federal sex trafficking allegations. The document includes a link to a Miami Herald article and a strict confidentiality disclaimer noting the information is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and referencing the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document appears to be a cover sheet or separator page from a legal production. It lists attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez and The LS Law Firm in the top left corner and contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031402' in the bottom right, indicating it is part of a production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article discussing the legal fallout and investigations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It details a DOJ investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the plea deal, initiated by members of Congress including Ben Sasse and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The article also mentions a letter to the New York Times from Epstein's legal team (including Kenneth Starr) defending the original deal, and an upcoming court hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents related to Epstein's crimes.
This document appears to be the footer of an email or legal correspondence from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez of The LS Law Firm. It references other legal counsel associated with Jeffrey Epstein (Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger, Martin G. Weinberg) and links to a Miami Herald article. Notably, the legal disclaimer identifies the information as the property of 'JEE' (presumably Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error.
This document is Page 2 of a legal filing titled 'Notice of Filing Transcript In Supplemental Support of Bradley Edwards' Motion for Summary Judgment' in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It contains a 'Counsel List' providing the contact information (firm name, address, phone, and fax) for five attorneys: Bradley J. Edwards, Jack A. Goldberger, Marc S. Nurik, Tonja Haddad Coleman, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. The document is Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017489.
This document is a court exhibit containing a printout of a New York Times 'Letter to the Editor' published on March 5, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Ken Starr). The attorneys argue that the number of women involved in the investigation was exaggerated, deny the existence of an international sex-trafficking operation or sex parties at his home, and assert that Epstein is entitled to 'finality' regarding his plea deal. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document page details the terms of a 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office, which included immunity for co-conspirators like Nadia Marcinkova. It also highlights that victims E.W. and L.M. were misled by the FBI regarding the status of the investigation after a plea deal had already been reached.
This document details the Non-Prosecution Agreement signed by Jeffrey Epstein in 2007, which granted immunity to his co-conspirators, including Nadia Marcinkova. It highlights that Marcinkova allegedly participated in sex acts with minors alongside Epstein. Furthermore, the document criticizes the FBI for sending letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was ongoing, despite a plea agreement having already been reached in 2007.
This document contains the text of two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The editorials criticize Epstein's legal maneuvering, the delayed justice for his solicitation charges involving underage girls, and the aggressive tactics of his high-profile legal defense team.
This document contains the text of Palm Beach Post editorials from July 2008 criticizing the legal outcome of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights the disparity in justice for the wealthy, detailing Epstein's high-profile legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger), specific allegations of abuse involving minors, and the perceived leniency of his plea deal and incarceration in county jail rather than state prison.
This document contains two transcripts of Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein. The texts detail the composition of his high-profile legal team, the filing of civil lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of minors (including specific details of abuse against a 14-year-old), and critical commentary on his plea deal and 18-month sentence in county jail rather than state prison. The document highlights evidence found by police, including school schedules in Epstein's trash, contradicting his defense that he did not know the girls' ages.
This document is an FBI FD-350 form containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated January 25, 2008. The article reports on a federal lawsuit filed by attorney Jeffrey Herman on behalf of a 14-year-old girl ('Jane Doe') and her parents against Jeffrey Epstein, seeking over $50 million for alleged sexual assault in 2005. The article details the allegations, including Epstein's preference for minors, and describes a counter-strategy by Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Sanchez, Lefcourt) to discredit the plaintiffs by highlighting the parents' criminal history and alleging financial motivation.
This document contains two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles. The first, from February 13, criticizes the lack of consequences for Epstein despite a 2006 indictment and details his high-profile legal team's efforts to dismiss allegations. The second editorial, from July 7, reports that Epstein finally admitted to luring a teenage girl and began serving an 18-month jail sentence as part of a plea deal.
Correspondence between Epstein attorney and former US prosecutor
Correspondence between Epstein attorney and former US prosecutor not produced in discovery.
Referenced in the letter as a source of potential confusion.
Counsel conferred in a good faith effort to resolve issues contained within the Defendant's Motion to Strike (D.E. 20).
Regarding Epstein violating agreement to enter plea by Oct 26, 2007.
Acknowledged that language of Paragraph 8 is 'far from simple'.
Regarding Epstein violating agreement to enter plea by Oct 26, 2007.
Cover letter attaching signed Affirmation of NPA and Notice of Hearing; requests holding off on victim notification letters.
Message requesting the Office hold off on sending victim notification letters.
Alternative proposed call time at 5:00 p.m.
Proposed call at 5:00 p.m. to discuss details.
Discussing selection of attorneys for victims, the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and proposing Judge Davis as a mediator.
Sanchez is urging the recipient (who is on vacation) to finalize the plea deal. She mentions one outstanding issue and concerns that 'Alex' hasn't read defense submissions. She states they are prepared to sign 'as soon as today'.
Sanchez writes to a vacationing official stating she wants to finalize the plea deal, citing one outstanding issue and suggesting a specific person hasn't read defense submissions. She claims they are prepared to sign 'as soon as today'.
Informing counsel that the 2-year incarceration term is non-negotiable and setting a deadline for decision by August 17.
Requesting extension to respond to subpoenas; discussing state resolution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity