| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel recipients |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Sender)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GM (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Government Officials
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Redacted)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A court hearing for appearances of counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2020-08-11 | N/A | Dispute regarding timeline of Government response to discovery request. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-03-24 | N/A | Notice of Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell served via email. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes. | SDNY Courtroom | View |
An email chain from July 2020 involving defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, et al.) discussing a 'Protective Order' for discovery, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by 'GM' in filenames). Everdell sends a revised draft to the Government following a call on July 20th. The top emailer (name redacted) forwards this message expressing confusion, noting they cannot see the difference between the attached documents or find the redline.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 related to the criminal case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Laura Menninger emailed prosecutors (USANYS) attaching a letter regarding a request to view 'highly confidential materials' and 'scenes'. This email was then forwarded internally (likely among law enforcement or prosecution team members) with a request to discuss the matter.
An email dated July 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a group of recipients including David Oscar Markus, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of a legal filing (Reply_to_Order_Dkt_312.pdf) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. S2 20 Cr. 330).
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
This document is an email dated November 9, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim). The email notifies counsel that a hard drive containing new discovery production is available for pickup at One St. Andrew's Plaza and highlights a specific disclosure regarding a witness statement. It also confirms that copies of this and prior productions are being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell's review.
This document is an email chain dated July 14, 2020, providing a detailed log of legal calls made by Ghislaine Maxwell (USMS No. 02879-509) between July 6 and July 14, 2020. The sender forwards this list to ensure that 'Mark' (likely Mark Cohen or opposing counsel) does not misrepresent Maxwell's access to counsel during an upcoming hearing. The log details dates, times, durations, and participants of the calls, which primarily include attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, as well as Lea Harmon from Pretrial Services.
An email dated October 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), copying Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email attaches joint proposed jury questionnaires and voir dire questions, likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific technical issues regarding discovery production, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on over 110,000 documents extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution team discusses internally setting up a call with their vendor, PAE, to address these errors.
This document contains an email chain from March 29, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence details technical disputes regarding discovery materials, specifically the defense's inability to provide a hard drive to Maxwell in prison (MDC), issues with unreadable disks, missing email attachments, and discrepancies in metadata for over 110,000 files seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The prosecution explains that some metadata is missing because files were 'carved or deleted' and offers solutions for transferring missing files.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Laura Menninger, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing physical and electronic evidence. The discussion focuses on arranging a secure location (500 Pearl Street) for Maxwell and her team to review 'highly confidential' materials, including thousands of images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences, as well as physical evidence stored in an FBI warehouse. The defense raises concerns about access to laptops, the ability to compare physical and electronic evidence, and the specific handling of sensitive materials.
An email dated April 30, 2021, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to redacted recipients and copied to members of the defense team (Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email serves to circulate an attached letter regarding 'Hard Drives' that was recently filed on the docket addressed to Judge Nathan.
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sent a courtesy copy of an ECF filing—specifically a letter regarding sleep deprivation—to US Attorneys and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
This document is an email chain from March 2021 regarding discovery disputes in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific issues to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), including technical problems with Maxwell accessing files on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and significant metadata discrepancies where files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation/modification dates occurring after his death and the seizure of the devices (dates in 2020). The chain concludes with USANYS contractors scheduling an internal meeting to address these production issues.
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 1, 2021, addressed to defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves to distribute an attached Order issued by the Judge which was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
This document is an email chain between the defense team (including Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence, dated November 6-7, 2021, coordinates the exchange of juror 'strike' lists and 'keeps' for a joint submission to the Court. Specific details include technical difficulties with Excel files and a specific agreement to allow jurors 127, 151, and 458 to proceed to voir dire.
This document is an email dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits an unredacted request to charge (RTC) and verdict sheet, noting that redacted versions will be filed on the Electronic Court Filing (ECF) system and that the defense seeks to seal 'Exhibit A'. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
An email chain from November 3, 2021, regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the disclosure of juror names to counsel. The email also serves to notify recipients of Sternheim's new office address.
An email chain from October 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that discovery materials were shared via USAfx and discusses logistics for providing digital copies (CD or hard drive) to Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
This document is an email chain dated February 23, 2021, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of a bail application filing (attached as 'MAXWELL_BAIL_APPLICATION_with_EXHIBIT_2-23-17.pdf') to USANYS prosecutors, copying co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's office with the comment 'FYI'.
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2021, relating to the case United States v. Maxwell (20-Cr-330). Attorney David Oscar Markus emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit a responsive letter regarding a government filing from June 30, 2021, explaining that he lacked filing privileges in the SDNY. Judge Nathan's chambers replied with an attached order.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in November 2020. The defense expresses significant frustration regarding technical issues with hard drives provided to Maxwell at the MDC, including broken drives and a lack of consolidation, as well as severe restrictions on the hours Maxwell is permitted to use a laptop to review over 2 million pages of evidence. The prosecution responds by offering to consolidate materials onto a single drive and explaining that the limited laptop access (8:30am-3:30pm) is due to MDC security protocols requiring lieutenant supervision.
An email dated October 20, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim, Pagliuca, Menninger). The email attaches a 'Draft joint proposed request to charge' related to the Maxwell trial (inferred from attachment name) and sets a deadline for comments.
This document is an email from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan, dated December 19, 2020. It serves as a transmittal for filing a Renewed Bail Motion Reply Memorandum and accompanying exhibits under seal in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Other defense counsel, including Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger, are copied on the correspondence.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim filed a letter with the court, prompting Judge Nathan to order the prosecution (USANYS) to respond by 5 PM the following day. The prosecution notes internally that they have contacted the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to set up a call, likely to gather information needed for their response.
Forwarding attachments that were missing from a previous email.
Attached please find the Government's response to your August 9, 2020 letter.
Stating they are considering the request and will respond no later than Thursday, August 13th.
States he cannot wait until Thursday for a decision, needs to confer by phone tomorrow, or will advise Judge Nathan.
Sending attached conferral letter.
Sending an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order.
Attaches conferral letter.
1 pm call (1 hour)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity