Saudi High Commission (SHC)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Prince Salman
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Council of Ministers
|
Subsidiary creation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Legal Ruling (392 F.Supp.2d 539) | Federal Court | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017917.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) analyzing whether the Saudi High Commission (SHC) qualifies as an organ of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is thus entitled to foreign sovereign immunity. The text details arguments regarding SHC's status, funding sources, and structure, citing declarations from Saudi officials and legal precedents like Filler v. Hanvit Bank.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017915.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, specifically discussing allegations against Saudi Princes Salman and Naif. It details claims that Prince Salman and Prince Naif used their positions and various charities (such as the SHC, IIRO, and SJRC) to fund and support Islamic militants, including Al Qaeda and Hamas, in regions like Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Palestine. The text cites various complaints alleging the princes knowingly supported terrorist networks and ignored warnings from Western governments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017913.jpg
This document is a court opinion and order from the Southern District of New York regarding the multi-district litigation 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' Judge Casey addresses motions to dismiss filed by various defendants, including Saudi Princes (Salman and Naif), the Saudi High Commission, and various entities labeled as the 'SAAR Network' and Islamic charities, primarily arguing lack of jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document lists numerous defense attorneys and specific defendants accused of being material sponsors of terror.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017905.jpg
This document is a page from a 2019 Westlaw printout containing legal headnotes for the 2005 case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details legal arguments regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically affirming that the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and two Saudi officials were entitled to immunity in a lawsuit alleging they funded terrorism. The text discusses the rejection of a specific article offered as evidence by plaintiffs and establishes the legal standard for sovereign immunity regarding foreign agents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity