Council of Ministers
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
PIF
|
Supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CEDA
|
Reporting |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saudi High Commission (SHC)
|
Subsidiary creation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Establishment of the Emirates Council for Competitiveness | UAE | View |
| 1993-01-01 | N/A | Formation of SHC by Decision of the President of the Council of Ministers. | Saudi Arabia | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920. The text discusses the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Saudi Prince Naif and Prince Salman regarding their official acts under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), while analyzing whether personal jurisdiction exists for alleged private acts or conspiracy with al Qaeda. It details Prince Naif's role as Minister of Interior, his 1994 actions against Osama bin Laden, and the legal standards for establishing jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute and conspiracy theories.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017917.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) analyzing whether the Saudi High Commission (SHC) qualifies as an organ of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is thus entitled to foreign sovereign immunity. The text details arguments regarding SHC's status, funding sources, and structure, citing declarations from Saudi officials and legal precedents like Filler v. Hanvit Bank.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017916.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion (*In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) status of Saudi defendants. It details the court's denial of a motion to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif regarding a 1998 article linking Saudi charities to al Qaida, citing lack of authentication. It also establishes the 'Saudi High Commission' (SHC) as an organ of the Saudi government, noting Prince Salman's role as its President. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017915.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, specifically discussing allegations against Saudi Princes Salman and Naif. It details claims that Prince Salman and Prince Naif used their positions and various charities (such as the SHC, IIRO, and SJRC) to fund and support Islamic militants, including Al Qaeda and Hamas, in regions like Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Palestine. The text cites various complaints alleging the princes knowingly supported terrorist networks and ignored warnings from Western governments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017905.jpg
This document is a page from a 2019 Westlaw printout containing legal headnotes for the 2005 case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details legal arguments regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically affirming that the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and two Saudi officials were entitled to immunity in a lawsuit alleging they funded terrorism. The text discusses the rejection of a specific article offered as evidence by plaintiffs and establishes the legal standard for sovereign immunity regarding foreign agents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017856.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses legal tests for sovereign immunity under the FSIA, specifically analyzing whether entities like the KDIC (Korea) and PIF (Saudi Public Investment Fund) qualify as organs of a foreign state or political subdivisions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into foreign financial ties or the 9/11 litigation itself, though no specific mention of Jeffrey Epstein appears on this page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017849.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) detailing civil litigation related to the 9/11 attacks (specifically the 'Burnett' and 'Ashton' complaints). It outlines allegations against Saudi Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, claiming he funded Islamic charities (IIRO, Al Haramain, MWL, WAMY) that served as fronts for Al Qaeda. The text details a 1990 meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden, and notes $6 million in personal contributions from Sultan to these organizations since 1994.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017848.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the legal standards for jurisdictional discovery when sovereign immunity is asserted and begins detailing allegations against Prince Sultan of Saudi Arabia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017835.jpg
This document contains legal headnotes from a court case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) in relation to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It details court rulings that alleged actions by a Saudi Prince and Saudi Arabia—such as charitable contributions and intelligence decisions—fell under the "discretionary function exception" of the FSIA, thereby barring claims from victims' survivors. It also touches on procedural standards for motions to dismiss regarding personal jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024947.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted by 'Ro’ya Al Iqtesadiah newspaper' with a high-ranking UAE official addressed as 'Your Highness.' The text focuses on the UAE's economic strategy during the global financial crisis (referencing the Lehman Brothers collapse and the G20 London summit, suggesting a 2009 timeframe), the establishment of the 'Emirates Council for Competitiveness,' and the country's diversification away from oil dependence. While part of a House Oversight document dump (likely related to Epstein's international connections), the text itself is strictly geopolitical and economic in nature.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016115.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Merrill Lynch research report (GEMs Paper #26) dated June 30, 2016, detailing the governance model of Saudi Vision 2030. It outlines the centralization of power under the Council of Economic and Development Affairs (CEDA), chaired by then-Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and describes major strategic programs including the restructuring of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) into a $2 trillion sovereign wealth fund and the transformation of Saudi Aramco. The page contains a governance hierarchy diagram and a table listing various strategic programs and their status.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity