OMB
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-12 | Legal case | Legal case cited: Davis v. Bombardier Recreational Prod., Inc., No. 3:11CV236-TSL-MTP, 2012 WL 11... | S.D. Miss. | View |
| 2010-03-01 | N/A | Publication of USA Today/Cato Institute analysis and OMB/OPM response regarding federal wages. | USA | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017514.jpg
Deposition transcript of Rothstein, who discusses his Ponzi scheme and the hiring of attorney Brad Edwards at his firm (RRA). Rothstein confirms his partner, Russell Adler, was a co-conspirator in the Ponzi scheme and recommended hiring Edwards because Edwards had a 'huge case involving a billionaire pedophile' (Epstein). Rothstein hoped the legitimate fees from the Epstein case would help him exit the Ponzi scheme during 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017513.jpg
These transcript pages document the testimony of Scott Rothstein, who admits to using the Jeffrey Epstein case to further his Ponzi scheme when he needed an influx of money. Rothstein states he learned of Epstein's billionaire status through his partner Russ Adler and internet research. The testimony also covers administrative details of the RRA law firm, specifically how travel expenses were approved for various attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017511.jpg
Deposition transcript (pages 82-85) where a law firm partner is questioned by an interrogator named Tonja. The questioning covers fundraisers held in 2009, the hiring of former Palm Beach judge Bill Berger, and internal communications involving an investigator named Mr. Jenne regarding 'causes of action against Epstein' and 'information we need to use' concerning plaintiffs. The witness also confirms the firm had the capability to monitor employee emails and internet activity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017510.jpg
This is a deposition transcript (pages 78-81) involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on the mention of RRA and Ponzi scheme) being questioned by an attorney named Tonja. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme, creating fake settlement documents, and luring investors. The questioning shifts to the 'Epstein case,' specifically asking if the witness or his associates (Kip, Brad, Russ) utilized the case for publicity or spoke to the press, to which the witness claims no specific recollection. The witness confirms knowing Epstein was from Palm Beach but denies further knowledge of his residence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017509.jpg
A deposition transcript involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on context of Ponzi scheme and Ken Jenne association) being questioned by 'Tonja'. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme and discusses using the Epstein case flight manifest—containing 'big names'—as a tool to convince investors of the case's value. The witness also recalls conversations with Ken Jenne regarding a confidential informant in their office and confirms hiring a man named Wayne Black.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017507.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 66-69) of a deposition of Scott Rothstein. He is questioned by Ms. Haddad regarding the electronic filing of federal court cases via PACER in 2009, specifically concerning a complaint filed by attorney Brad Edwards around July 24th. Rothstein admits that while he lacks specific recollection of the filing or a July 23rd meeting, the case may have been utilized to further his Ponzi scheme. The document ends with a question regarding whether Cara Holmes was an FBI or IRS agent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017505.jpg
In this deposition transcript, a witness named Scott (likely Scott Rothstein) admits to Ms. Haddad that he operated a Ponzi scheme involving the sale of fake legal settlements. He testifies that while 90% of the settlements were completely fictitious, he utilized an actual ongoing case involving Jeffrey Epstein to 'bolster the visual' for sophisticated investors to convince them the settlements were real. He describes creating fake documents and introducing investors to lawyers working on the real Epstein file to add legitimacy to his fraud.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017504.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 54-57) in which the deponent admits to operating a Ponzi scheme involving 'fake settlements.' The deponent discusses hiring former federal agent Cara Holmes to add legitimacy to the scheme and mentions using a case management system called 'Q-task.' The questioning focuses on whether the deponent used the 'Epstein case' and an associated flight manifest to further the Ponzi scheme, specifically referencing emails from July 2009 involving Ken Jenne, Brad Edwards, and Mr. Adler regarding an Epstein meeting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017503.jpg
This document contains pages 50-53 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (implied by RRA and Ponzi scheme references). The witness is questioned by Ms. Haddad about his interactions with investors (Discala/Clockwork Group) in 2009 and his use of the Epstein case files to legitimize a Ponzi scheme. The witness admits to stealing money from investors and mentions specific lawyers involved in the Epstein case at the RRA firm, including Brad Edwards and Russ Adler, and notes looking at a flight manifest at Adler's direction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017502.jpg
This is a deposition transcript of a witness named Scott (likely Scott Rothstein of RRA) being questioned by Ms. Haddad. The witness admits that his law firm's operations in 2009 were funded principally by a Ponzi scheme and theft, rather than legitimate revenue. He explicitly confesses to illicit activities involving law enforcement, politicians, judges, and organized crime. The questioning focuses heavily on the firm's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, revealing there was a specific 'Epstein conference room' at the firm and a firm-wide meeting regarding Epstein in July 2009, alongside a large volume of emails concerning Epstein litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017501.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (Pages 42-45) of an individual admitting to running a Ponzi scheme. The witness discusses using the legitimacy of the 'Epstein case' to sell fictitious settlements to investors. The witness recalls being told by associate Russ Adler that Jeffrey Epstein had flown Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew on his plane, information used to impress investors. The witness admits to leaving investors alone in an office (without cameras) to view 'real pleadings' in the Epstein case to verify the scheme's legitimacy. The text also references email communications with Ken Jenne regarding the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017500.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 38-41) from a legal proceeding involving a Ponzi scheme. The witness (likely a lawyer) describes how they used legitimate case files from the 'Epstein case'—specifically pointing out a flight manifest—to convince investors that a fake settlement opportunity was real. The witness details a strategy of bringing boxes of files into their office (assisted by Ken Jenne) and intentionally leaving the room ('wink, wink') to allow investors to breach attorney-client privilege and view the documents to verify the case's existence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017499.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (likely of Scott Rothstein) detailing the operation of a Ponzi scheme. The deponent admits to hiring corrupt law enforcement for 'illegitimate things' and explains how he used a settlement deal related to the 'Epstein case' around April 2009 to provide legitimacy and secure investments from the 'Clockwork Group' (including Von Allmen and AJ Discala). The text also references the murder of Melissa Lewis as a reason for the deponent's paranoia and heavy security detail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017498.jpg
This document contains pages 30-33 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (evidenced by mentions of 'RRA entities' and 'Adler'). The witness details the extensive surveillance system installed in their law firm, including cameras in hallways and the shareholder's lounge. Crucially, the witness explicitly admits to engaging in 'significant amount of illegal activity' and hiring former law enforcement (including Ken Jenne) to engender support for these illegal activities and to perform both legitimate and illegitimate tasks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017497.jpg
A deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein, discussing the internal operations of his law firm. The witness admits to 'creating this story for the investors' regarding a $7 million investment in a software system called 'Q-task'. He details relying on associates like Russ Adler and Stu Rosenfeldt for both legitimate and illegitimate activities, and describes the firm's surveillance systems and size (70 attorneys) in 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017495.jpg
This is a condensed deposition transcript (pages 18-21) involving an unnamed senior lawyer/partner testifying about the hiring of an attorney named Brad. The witness discusses their prior knowledge of the 'Epstein case,' describing Jeffrey Epstein as a 'billionaire' and an 'extremely collectible pedophile' representing significant financial value. The witness confirms discussing the case with Russ Adler, and possibly Farmer and Jaffe, before hiring Brad, but denies hiring Brad solely for the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017494.jpg
This document contains pages 14-17 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (implied by context of a Ponzi scheme and specific attorneys mentioned). The witness discusses the hiring practices of his law firm, distinguishing between the 'legitimate side' and the 'Ponzi scheme.' He specifically details the hiring of attorneys including Steve Osber and 'Brad' (likely Brad Edwards), noting that he relied heavily on trust and recommendations from existing partners like Gary Farmer, often hiring people without deep background checks if they were vouched for by trusted insiders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017493.jpg
This document contains pages 10-13 of a deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation. The witness discusses hiring practices with their partner 'Stuart' and explicitly admits that the firm's General Counsel, David Boden, acted as a 'consigliere' for 'illegal operations.' The witness details efforts to legitimize the firm by hiring reputable lawyers, specifically focusing on a lawyer named 'Brad' (likely Brad Edwards, given the context), who was highly recommended by 'Russ' and political figures to help 'rescue the firm' with a legitimate tort practice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017492.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 6-9) in which a witness (likely Scott Rothstein) admits to starting a Ponzi scheme around 2005 out of 'greed and the need to support the law firm.' The testimony details the history of his law firm's locations (One Financial Plaza, Colonial Bank Building, 401 Building) and partners (Stu Rosenfeldt, Susan Dolin, Michael Pancier). The witness clarifies that despite having approximately 70 attorneys and various people with 'partner' or 'shareholder' titles for 'prestige' and 'ego,' the only actual equity shareholders receiving distributions were himself and Stu Rosenfeldt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017491.jpg
This document is a four-page excerpt (pages 2-5) of a deposition transcript for witness Scott Rothstein. The transcript lists appearances by attorneys including Jack Goldberger (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Scarola (representing Brad Edwards). Notably, Darryn Indyke is present and identified as Epstein's in-house counsel. The questioning begins regarding a 'scheme' at Rothstein's firm that allegedly started in 2005 or 2006.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017490.jpg
Cover page for the deposition of Scott Rothstein taken via video conference on June 14, 2012. The deposition is part of a civil lawsuit (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG) filed by Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023702.jpg
This document is a profile of Robert Lawrence Kuhn published in the China Daily European Weekly in July 2012, detailing his role as a strategist and insider regarding Chinese leadership. It outlines his career history, including the sale of his company to Citigroup, his biography of Jiang Zemin, and his views on the disconnect between Western perceptions and Chinese political realities. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a document dump related to a congressional investigation, though the text itself contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013480.jpg
This document is the cover page for the deposition of Scott Rothstein, taken on June 14, 2012, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition is part of a civil lawsuit (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG) filed by Jeffrey Epstein against Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The document includes a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024022.jpg
This document is page 11 of a confidential presentation (likely an investment prospectus for 'NLV-III') detailing the history and senior team of New Leaf Ventures. It features a timeline of funds raised from 1993 to 2007 under Sprout and New Leaf brands, totaling billions in capital. The page highlights the biography of Managing Director Philippe Chambon, detailing his history with Sprout, Boston Consulting Group, and Sandoz Pharmaceutical, as well as his numerous board memberships in the healthcare and biotech sectors. The document bears a House Oversight Committee control number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025244.jpg
A J.P. Morgan 'Eye on the Market' report dated April 9, 2012, discussing US economic debt bubbles, historical comparisons to the 1950s, and state pension liabilities. The document uses the sci-fi novel 'The Day of the Triffids' as a metaphor for unforeseen economic consequences. It includes a footnote criticizing Austan Goolsbee's 2007 stance on subprime lending. The page bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025244, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity