Palm Beach Daily News
OrganizationRelationship Network
Phone_Messages_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains scanned telephone message books from the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office (likely Barry Krischer's office) spanning from 2005 to 2009. The messages document high-frequency communication between the State Attorney ('BK' or 'Mr. K') and Epstein's defense team (Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Bruce Lyons), as well as significant media inquiries regarding Epstein's indictment, prison sentence, and potential charges in the Virgin Islands. A critical handwritten note advises 'No don't give to Feds our case unless they take all,' highlighting the jurisdictional tension between state and federal prosecutors.
010-10.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated April 15, 2015, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a supplemental protective order. Epstein sought to keep correspondence between his lawyers and the US Government regarding his non-prosecution agreement sealed from the public. Judge Kenneth Marra ruled that the public interest in determining if the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) was violated outweighs Epstein's desire for confidentiality, stating that plea negotiations are not privileged.
EFTA00018167.pdf
An email chain from July 9, 2019, initiated by reporter Jeff Ostrowski of The Palm Beach Post. Ostrowski is inquiring with government officials (names redacted) about the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein, specifically asking if the government plans to pursue the forfeiture of the El Brillo Way property in Palm Beach, noting it was not specifically listed by address in the forfeiture clause. The email was forwarded internally among officials.
EFTA00016521.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 in which Thomas Volscho forwards evidence to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The evidence consists of 1997 classified advertisements from Palm Beach newspapers where a 'Miss Maxwell' or 'Ms. Maxwell' is seeking help for answering phones and light cleaning during school holidays. Volscho notes that the phone number matches a 1996 traffic citation for Ghislaine Maxwell and references a Daily Mail article about her using ads to recruit victims.
EFTA00014064.pdf
This document is an email thread from September 17, 2008, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys (names redacted) and Epstein's defense attorney Jack Goldberger, with Jay Lefkowitz cc'd. The subject concerns a letter regarding Epstein and the Palm Beach Daily News. Goldberger states that they 'will deal with the state' and confirms that an addendum has been filed. The thread includes an attachment named 'Lefkowitz 080917.pdf'.
EFTA00014030.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 15, 2008, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The email discusses a meeting with the Palm Beach Police Chief regarding articles in the Palm Beach Daily News that highlighted the U.S. Attorney's Office was not informed of a 'release' (likely referring to Epstein's work release) until after the fact. The AUSA notes they informed the Chief about a letter sent to the Sheriff's Office, which the Chief intended to obtain via public records request.
EFTA00013952.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office dated September 19, 2008. Michele Dargan, a reporter for the Palm Beach Daily News, contacted the office asking why they decided not to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein federally despite the plea agreement terms. The internal response reveals that the Assistant U.S. Attorney on the case refused to speak to the reporter, and the press officer ultimately gave a 'no comment' response.
EFTA00013698.pdf
Legal correspondence from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, to prosecutor Jeffrey Sloman regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The letter defends Epstein's agents contacting potential witnesses, confirms the plea and sentencing date of January 4, 2008, and insists on Epstein receiving an 18-month sentence with standard Florida state work release privileges ('equal treatment'). Lefkowitz also raises concerns about the government's handling of victim representation under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
This document details events in November 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release, which USAO official Villafaña believed breached his non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Villafaña communicated her concerns to defense attorney Black and other officials, leading to a notice of NPA violation and the recusal of Acosta from the case. The document highlights the ongoing dispute regarding the terms of Epstein's incarceration and the perceived special treatment he received.
DOJ-OGR-00021421.jpg
This legal document details the FBI's efforts in January 2008 to re-establish contact with victims in the Jeffrey Epstein case by sending standardized notification letters. FBI agent Villafaña expressed concern to her supervisors about losing contact with victims and proposed proactive measures, while also noting that Epstein's defense attorneys were aggressively deposing victims in a related state case. The document highlights the procedural challenges of maintaining victim communication during a complex federal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021315.jpg
This document details internal DOJ conflicts in November 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Prosecutor Villafaña argued Epstein's 12-hour-a-day release to the 'Florida Science Foundation' breached his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) requiring 24-hour confinement, prompting her to ask superiors if she could indict him. Concurrently, USAO official Alex Acosta recused himself from the case due to employment discussions with Epstein's defense firm, Kirkland & Ellis.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019151.jpg
This document appears to be pages 34 and 35 from a book (possibly a true crime account like 'Filthy Rich'), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text describes September 11, 2005, when the local NBC affiliate WPTV received an anonymous phone tip from a nervous boy about a 'prostitution ring' in Palm Beach involving local high school girls. It also references the media landscape in Palm Beach, including the Palm Beach Daily News and Chief Reiter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017610.jpg
This document details the contentious plea negotiations involving Jeffrey Epstein, where the U.S. Attorney's Office agreed to a non-prosecution agreement without informing the victims, leading to a lawsuit under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text highlights the government's argument that CVRA rights do not attach without formal federal charges and frames the central legal issue regarding when these rights apply. It includes numerous footnotes citing media reports and legal filings related to the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010493.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book containing four photographs with captions documenting various social events and figures associated with the Epstein case. It includes photos of Sarah Kellen with her husband at the Kentucky Derby, Nadia Marcinkova in a cockpit with pilot Larry Visoski, Michael and Janet Reiter at Mar-a-Lago, and retired detective Joe Recarey. The right side of the page contains fragmentary text mentioning Mort Zuckerman and Microsoft.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011945.jpg
This article reports on court filings revealing links between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 modeling agency owner Jean Luc Brunel, alleging they brought underage girls into the country with promises of modeling contracts. The documents state that Epstein provided financial support to MC2 and used his New York condos to house models, while also attempting to block depositions of high-profile associates like Guislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013433.jpg
This document is a news article from September 20, 2009, detailing various aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal situation and the reactions of his attorney and victims. It covers his jail time, probation, the sealing of documents, ongoing lawsuits, and the police investigation that led to charges of soliciting prostitution instead of more serious offenses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013432.jpg
A 2009 LexisNexis printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article detailing the unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article highlights that Epstein avoided life in prison for federal sex trafficking charges in exchange for a light state sentence, and controversially secured immunity for co-conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova. Attorneys for the victims express outrage at the deal and the exclusion of victims from the process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013429.jpg
This document is an archived page from the Palm Beach Daily News dated June 11, 2009, discussing the legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It features statements from attorney Edwards, representing three underage victims, and Deanna Shullman, representing the press, both arguing that the sealing of the plea agreement is unusual and violates public records rights in Florida. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013429', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013421.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013417.jpg
A printed webpage from The Palm Beach Post (dated 2011, article from 2009) detailing the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. The article highlights the tension between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, citing a 2006 letter where Reiter called the prosecutor's handling of the case 'highly unusual.' It also quotes attorneys discussing how Epstein's wealth allowed him to avoid federal prosecution through a 'back-room deal' involving high-profile lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013412.jpg
This document is page 2 of a printout from the Palm Beach Daily News archives, dated April 7, 2011. It contains the conclusion of an article discussing legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein and a 'Doe case,' specifically noting a discovery deadline of May 31 and a trial date of July 14. The page is predominantly filled with unrelated web advertisements and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013411.jpg
A May 2010 article from the Palm Beach Daily News reports on a Manhattan federal court hearing where Judge Lawrence M. McKenna took custody of a tape-recorded conversation between reporter George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys for Epstein's victims, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, sought the release of the tape to prove Epstein's lack of remorse in civil cases, while Rush's attorneys argued against its release citing reporter's privilege. The judge reserved ruling on whether the 22-minute recording would be released.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013409.jpg
This document is a printed webpage from the Palm Beach Daily News dated April 7, 2011, reporting on a motion filed by attorneys representing victims (Doe 1 and 2) to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The motion argues the agreement is illegal because the government failed to notify victims as required by the Crime Victim Rights Act, allegedly to protect Epstein due to his political connections. The article includes comments from U.S. Attorney's Office spokesperson Alicia Valle denying CVRA violations because no federal charges were filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity